Saturday, October 31, 2015

Indian National Army was reason for British to Quit India not Gandhi

‘The Indian National Army was a greater reason for Indian independence than the Quit India Movement,’ argues the writer. Photo: On the fore, Bose inspecting INA troops in Singapore; Gandhi (inset) presiding over a prayer meeting.
Seven pieces of evidence bear it out.

Writing in his much-acclaimed book Indian Struggle, Subhas Chandra Bose stated, “Mahatma Gandhi has rendered and will continue to render phenomenal service to his country.” “But”, he added, “India’s salvation will not be achieved under his leadership.”
Nearly 70 years after power was transferred to Indian hands, sufficient information has come on record to give a new thrust to the old question: “Who brought India freedom — Gandhi or Bose?”
Of course, in attempting to answer this mother of all vexed queries, I am not committing the sacrilege of postulating that either of the two did not play a pivotal role in the struggle for freedom. It’s just an attempt to rank the No 1 — “the man of the match” in cricket parlance.
Well, I am sticking my neck out and batting for Subhas Chandra Bose. Not because some right wing historian has enlightened me, but because I see some relevant pieces of information which became known several years after Independence. Taking a look at them has shaped my thinking to arrive at this conclusion. If you disagree and have data negating the cumulating effect of following citations, please do offer your point of view. But make sure you stay away from argumentum ad hominem or simply reiterating your beliefs. Let the facts speak for themselves.
The people who were best positioned to answer the question were those who had an inside knowledge of the situation as it prevailed in India from 1942 to 1947. In 1942, Gandhi launched the Quit India movement. The view from the Bose’s side was that it was his suggestion in 1939 to serve a 6-month’s ultimatum on the British Government, which was accepted by Gandhi in totality in his Quit India resolution of August 1942. Prior to this, Gandhi was, as Bose himself stated repeatedly, most reluctant to launch a movement. This is what he wrote in Indian Struggle.
“On 6 September(1939), Mahatma Gandhi, after meeting the Viceroy, Lord Linlithgow, issued a press statement saying that in spite of the differences between India and Britain on the question of Indian independence, India should cooperate with Britain in her hour of danger. This statement came as a bombshell to the Indian people, who since 1927 had been taught by the Congress leaders to regard the next war as a unique opportunity for winning freedom.”
Be that as it may, the Quit India movement was launched in good earnest. Bose praised Gandhi’s stirring speech as he launched it. But, unfortunately, the movement was “crushed within 3 weeks”. Thus spake Khushwant Singh, someone who was not a fan of Subhas Bose. Anyhow, having lived through those times, Singh further explained: “The British were not evicted from India; they found it increasingly difficult to rule it and decided to call it a day.”
So what happened between 1942 and 1947 that made the British take the call? Conventional wisdom can be explained by way of 1954 Bollywood hit “दे दी हमें आज़ादी बिना खडग बिना ढाल/साबरमती के संत तू ने कर दिया कमाल”, which extols Gandhi for having singlehandedly delivered freedom to India solely through the non-violent means. Celebrated historians and researchers with all their experience and exposure (which doesn’t come easily to those who go against the current) can put it better. Prime Minister Narendra Modi seems to back it every now and then.
But how does one gloss over the other side of the story as it comes from records and statements crediting Bose with creating a situation that made the British take the decision?
There is a ground rule in journalism — and also in intelligence — that if 3 informed reliable sources independent of each other make similar statements, the sum of their statements has to as close to truth as one gets it.
So let’s try and connect some dots and see what story they tell.
  1. As late as 1946, Gandhi stated, “We shall be able to win freedom only through the principles the Congress has adopted for the past 30 years.” Gandhi’s own three pet principles were “truth, ahimsa and brahmacharya”. The first 2 are well-espoused by Gandhians, who rather not speak about the third for it is a blot on the Gandhian legacy.
  2. No one knew India’s internal situation better than the Director, Intelligence Bureau. One who thinks it’s the editor of some newspaper is superficial. Here’s what Sir Norman Smith, DIB, noted in a secret report of November 1945 that was declassified in the 1970s: “The situation in respect of the Indian National Army is one which warrants disquiet. There has seldom been a matter which has attracted so much Indian public interest and, it is safe to say, sympathy… the threat to the security of the Indian Army is one which it would be unwise to ignore.”
  3. An agreement of sort came from Lt General SK Sinha, former Governor of Jammu & Kashmir and Assam, who was one of the only 3 Indian officers posted in the Directorate of Military Operations in New Delhi in 1946. “There was considerable sympathy for the INA within the Army… It is true that fears of another 1857 had begun to haunt the British in 1946.” Sinha wrote this in 1976.
  4. Agreeing with this contention were a number of British MPs who met British Prime Minister Clement Attlee in February 1946. “There are two alternative ways of meeting this common desire (a) that we should arrange to get out, (b) that we should wait to be driven out. In regard to (b), the loyalty of the Indian Army is open to question; the INA have become national heroes….” This minute too was declassified in the 1970s.
  5. A most valuable light on the role of the INA was thrown by Bhimrao Ambedkar in February 1956, a few months before he passed away, in a tell-all interview to the BBC. “I don’t know how Mr Attlee suddenly agreed to give India independence… It seems to me from my own analysis that two things led the Labour party to take this decision: 1. The national army that was raised by Subhas Chandra Bose. The British had been ruling the country in the firm belief that whatever may happen in the country or whatever the politicians do, they will never be able to change the loyalty of soldiers. That was one prop on which they were carrying on the administration. And that was completely dashed to pieces.”
  6. The clincher of an argument came from Earl Attlee himself as he visited India in October 1956. Some 2 decades later, PB Chakravarty, Chief Justice of Calcutta High Court and acting Governor of West Bengal in 1956, recalled his talks with the former British PM in the following words: “Toward the end of our discussion I asked Attlee what was the extent of Gandhi’s influence upon the British decision to quit India. Hearing this question, Attlee’s lips became twisted in a sarcastic smile as he slowly chewed out the word, ‘m-i-n-i-m-a-l!”
  7. British historian Michael Edwardes fairly summed this up in his 1964 book, The Last Years of British India. “It slowly dawned upon the Government of India that the backbone of the British rule, the Indian Army, might now no longer be trustworthy. The ghost of Subhas Bose, like Hamlet’s father, walked the battlements of the Red Fort (where the INA soldiers were being tried), and his suddenly amplified figure overawed the conference that was to lead to Independence.”
These are a few of the many factoids that I’d like you to factor in to make your own assessment. As for me, I have been haunted by a lament of Bose which appears in a letter of his dated 21 November 1940. “In the past, it is we who have toiled and suffered and others have reaped the harvest. But how long will this go on?”
As Jawaharlal Nehru delivered his famous “Tryst with destiny” speech, not a word in it was devoted to Bose or his INA, but for whom the transfer of power wouldn’t have taken place in 1947.
Anuj Dhar is the author of bestseller India’s biggest cover-up(नेताजी रहस्य गाथा in Hindi).
from harshad30.wordpress.com

Real owner of Facebook Divya Narendra

सोशल वेबवाइट FB यानी facebook चलाने वालों मे एक फीसदी लोगों को भी यह पता नहीं होगा कि इसके फाउंडर मार्क जुकरबर्ग नहीं बल्कि अप्रवासी भारतीय दिव्य नरेंद्र है। दिव्य नरेंद्र हिंदुस्तानियों के लिए ज्यादा जाना-पहचाना नाम नहीं है।
महज 29 साल के दिव्य नरेंद्र अमरीका में रहने वाले अप्रावासी भारतीय हैं।
(google पर search करे ! divya narendra )
उनके माता-पिता काफी समय पहले से अमरीका में ही आ बसे हैं। दिव्य का जन्म 18 मार्च 1982 को न्यूयार्क में हुआ था। जाहिर है कि दिव्य के पास भी अमरीकी नागरिकता है।पेशे से उनके माता-पिता डॉक्टर हैं। परंपरावादी। अंतर्मुखी। दूसरे भारतीय माता-पिता की तरह वे भी दिव्य को डॉक्टर बनाना चाहते थे, पर दिव्य को यह मंजूर नहीं था। उनके अंदर एक एंटरप्रिन्योर बनने का सपना था। तमाम संघर्षों से जूझते हुए वह ऐसा करने में सफल भी हुए।और 2008 के अमेरिकी कोर्ट के फैसले के बाद यह बात पक्की भी हो गई कि दुनिया की सबसे बड़ी सोशल नेटवर्किंग साइट फेसबुक का आइडिया दिव्य नरेंद्र का था।
दरअसल फेसबुक का जन्म हॉर्वर्ड कनेक्शन सोशल साइट की निर्माण प्रक्रिया के दौरान हुआ। दिव्य हॉर्वर्ड कनेक्शन प्रॉजेक्ट पर काफी आगे बढ़ चुके थे। उसके लंबे समय बाद जुकरबर्ग मौखिक समझौते के तहत उसमें शामिल हुए। पूरी चालाकी से उन्होंने इस प्रॉजेक्ट को हाईजैक कर लिया और बाद में बाकायदा फेसबुक नाम से डोमेन रजिस्टर्ड कर उस प्रॉजेक्ट को अमली जामा पहना दिया। इस बीच दिव्य और उनके सहयोगियों की जुकरबर्ग से तीखी नोकझोंक हुई। यूनिवर्सिटी मैनेजमेंट ने मामले में हस्तक्षेप किया और दिव्य को कोर्ट जाने की सलाह दी।
दिव्य ने जुकरबर्ग के खिलाफ 2004 में अमेरिका की एक अदालत में मुकदमा कर दिया। फैसला दिव्य और उनके दोस्तों के पक्ष में आया। जुकरबर्ग को हर्जाने के तौर पर 650 लाख डॉलर चुकाने पड़े, लेकिन दिव्य इससे संतुष्ट नहीं हुए। उनका तर्क था कि उस समय फेसबुक के शेयरों की जो बाजार में कीमत थी, उन्हें उसके हिसाब से हर्जाना नहीं दिया गया।
उनका कहना था कि हर्जाने का राशि फेसबुक की मौजूदा बाजार कीमत के आधार पर तय की जानी चाहिए। हाल ही में गोल्डमैन स्नैच ने फेसबुक की बाजार कीमत 50 बिलियन डॉलर आंकी थी। उन्होंने एक बार फिर 2008 मे मुकदमा दायर किया, लेकिन अमरीकी कोर्ट ने पिछले फैसले को ही बरकरार रखा। अमरीकी कोर्ट के फैसले के आईने में देखा जाए तो जो प्रसिद्धि आज मार्क जुकरबर्ग को मिली है, उसके सही हकदार facebook के असली निर्माता दिव्य नरेंद्र थे।
तो अंत जो लोग हमारे असली भारतीय इतिहास को जानते है वो बहुत आसानी से समझ जाएंगे कि भारतीयों द्वारा किए गए आविष्कारों को चोरी कर अपने नाम से दुनिया मे फैलाना अंग्रेज़ो की पुरानी आदत है ! वो बेशक गुरुत्वकर्षण सिद्धांत के नियम हो ,मर्करी बनाना हो ,कागज बनाना हो ,पलास्टिक सर्जरी करना हो या बापू तलपडे द्वारा हवाई जहाज उड़ाना हो या जगदीश चंद्र बसु द्वारा टेलीफोन का निर्माण करना हो ! और ऐसे सैंकड़ों आविष्कार हो ! या अंत मे भाई दिव्य नरेंद्र द्वारा facebook का निर्माण करना हो ! सब अंग्रेज़ो ने भारतीयो से चोरी कर अपने नाम से चिपकाया हुआ है !
इस जानकरी को हर भारतीय तक पहुंचाये !
भारतीय होने पर गर्व करे !
अधिक से अधिक share करें !!
हमने दुनिया को और क्या क्या सिखाया है जानने के लिए click करें !
वन्देमातरम ! भारत माता की जय !
In those running the facebook social Vebwait FB cent of people would not even know that it ‘s founder Mark Jukrberg rather Divya Narendra expatriates . Indian Divya Narendra more familiar name.
Divya Narendra Aprawasi of just 29 years old living in USA are Indians . His parents are settled in USA since a long time ago . Divine was born in New York on March 18, 1982 . U.S. citizenship is obviously too close to the divine . Profession, his parents are doctors . Conservatives . Introverted . The other Indian parents wanted to become doctors they like, divine , was not acceptable to the divine . Inside his dream of becoming a Antrprinyor .
The Harvard Connection social site Facebook was born during the manufacturing process . Divine Connection Project at Harvard had gone further . Long after he joined the Jukrberg oral agreement . He has cunningly hijacked the project and after having duly registered domain name that Facebook has worn the projects implemented . Meanwhile, the divine and colleagues Jukrberg was reduced to prickly . University management has intervened in the case and the Court advised divine .
Divine against the Jukrberg sued in a court of the United States in 2004 . Divine judgment came in favor of their friends . Had to pay $ 650 million as damages to Jukrberg , but God was not satisfied . He argued that the market price of shares of Facebook at the time was , according to him was never compensated .
He said Facebook’s current market value based on the amount of compensation should be fixed . Goldman recently snatch the market value of Facebook was valued at $ 50 billion . He sued again in 2008 , but only to the U.S. court upheld an earlier ruling . U.S. Court ruling looked in the mirror today, Mark Jukrberg then famously showed , Divya Narendra its rightful owner was the real creator of facebook .
So the people who know our real Indian history will understand it very easily steal inventions made by Indians called his old habit of British diffuse in the world is That theory course Gurutvkarsn rule , creating mercury , creating paper , Bapu Talpade Plastik surgery or flying an airplane or by telephone by Jagadish Chandra Bose to build it! Hundreds of such inventions ! Finally facebook or by Divya Narendra brother to build it! All British pasted his name was stolen from the Indians !
The information transferred to every Indian !
Proud to be Indian !
harshad30.wordpress.com

Gupta Empire


Gupta Empire
The Gupta Empire (Sanskrit: गुप्त साम्राज्य, Gupta Sāmrājya) was an ancient Indian empire, founded by Maharaja Sri Gupta, which existed from approximately 320 to 550 CE and covered much of the Indian Subcontinent. The peace and prosperity created under the leadership of the Guptas enabled the pursuit of scientific and artistic endeavors. This period is called the Golden Age of India and was marked by extensive inventions and discoveries in science, technology, engineering, art, dialectic, literature, logic, mathematics, astronomy, religion and philosophy that crystallized the elements of what is generally known as Hindu culture. Chandra Gupta I, Samudra Gupta, and Chandra Gupta II were the most notable rulers of the Gupta dynasty. The 4th century CE Sanskrit poet Kalidasa credits Guptas with having conquered about twenty one kingdoms, both in and outside India, including the kingdoms of Parasikas, the Hunas, the Kambojas, tribes located in the west and east Oxus valleys, the Kinnaras, Kiratas etc.
The high points of this cultural creativity are magnificent architecture, sculptures and paintings. The Gupta period produced scholars such as Kalidasa, Aryabhata, Varahamihira, Vishnu Sharma and Vatsyayana who made great advancements in many academic fields. Science and political administration reached new heights during the Gupta era. Strong trade ties also made the region an important cultural center and set the region up as a base that would influence nearby kingdoms and regions in Burma, Sri Lanka, and Southeast Asia. The earliest available Indian epics are also thought to have been written around this period.
The empire gradually declined because of many factors such as substantial loss of territory and imperial authority caused by their own erstwhile feudatories and the invasion by the Huna peoples from Central Asia. After the collapse of the Gupta Empire in the 6th century, India was again ruled by numerous regional kingdoms. A minor line of the Gupta clan continued to rule Magadha after the disintegration of the empire. These Guptas were ultimately ousted by Vardhana ruler Harsha Vardhana, who established an empire in the first half of the 7th century.
>> Origin of the Guptas
According to many historians, the Gupta dynasty was a Vaishya dynasty. Historian Ram Sharan Sharma asserts that the Vaishya Guptas “appeared as a reaction against oppressive rulers”. A.S. Altekar, a historian and archaeologist, who has written several books on Gupta coinage, also regarded the caste of the Guptas as Vaishya on the basis of the ancient Indian texts on law, which prescribe the name-ending with Gupta for a member of the Vaishya caste. According to historian Michael C. Brannigan, the rise of the Gupta Empire was one of the most prominent violations of the caste system in ancient India.
There are contradictory theories regarding the original homeland of the Guptas. According to HC Raychoudhuri the Guptas originated from the Varendri region which is now part of Rangpur and Rajshahi Division of Bangladesh. DC Ganguly on the other hand considers the surrounding region of Murshidabad as the original home of the Guptas.
Fa Hien was the first of the pilgrims who visited India during the reign of Gupta emperor Chandragupta II. He started his journey from China in 399 CE and reached India in 405 CE. During his stay in India up to 411 CE, he went on a pilgrimage to Mathura, Kanauj, Kapilavastu, Kushinagar, Vaishali, Pataliputra, Kashi and Rajgriha and made careful observations about the empire’s conditions. Fa Xian was pleased with the mildness of administration. The Penal Code was mild and offences were punished by fines only. From his accounts, the Gupta Empire was a prosperous period, until the Rome-China trade axis was broken with the fall of the Han dynasty, the Guptas’ did indeed prosper.
>> Srigupta and Ghatotkacha
The most likely time for the reign of Sri Gupta is c. 240–280 CE. A number of modern historians, which include Rakhaldas Bandyopadhyay and K. P. Jayaswal, think he and his son were possibly feudatories of the Kushans. His son and successor Ghatotkacha ruled probably from c. 280–319 CE. In contrast to their successor, Chandragupta I, who is mentioned as Maharajadhiraja, he and his son Ghatotkacha are referred to in inscriptions as Maharaja At the beginning of the 5th century the Guptas established and ruled a few small Hindu kingdoms in Magadha and around modern-day Bihar.
>> Chandragupta I
Ghatotkacha (reigned c. 280–319 CE), had a son named Chandragupta (reigned c. 319–335 CE) (not to be confused with Chandragupta Maurya (340–293 BCE), founder of the Mauryan Empire.) In a breakthrough deal, Chandragupta was married to Kumaradevi, a Lichchhavi princess—the main power in Magadha. With a dowry of the kingdom of Magadha (capital Pataliputra) and an alliance with the Lichchhavis, Chandragupta set about expanding his power, conquering much of Magadha, Prayaga and Saketa. He established a realm stretching from the Ganges River to Prayaga (modern-day Allahabad) by 321 CE. He assumed the imperial title of Maharajadhiraja. He expanded his empire through marriage alliances.
>> Samudragupta
Samudragupta, Parakramanka succeeded his father in 335 CE, and ruled for about 45 years, until his death in 380 CE. He took the kingdoms of Ahichchhatra and Padmavati early in his reign. He then attacked the Malwas, the Yaudheyas, the Arjunayanas, the Maduras and the Abhiras, all of which were tribes in the area. By his death in 380, he had incorporated over twenty kingdoms into his realm and his rule extended from the Himalayas to the river Narmada and from the Brahmaputra to the Yamuna. He gave himself the titles King of Kings and World Monarch. Historian Vincent Smith described him as the “Indian Napoleon”. He performed Ashwamedha yajna in which a horse is sacrificed along with the first wife. The stone replica of the horse, then prepared, is in the Lucknow Museum. The Samudragupta Prashasti inscribed on the Ashokan Pillar, now in Akbar’s Fort at Allahabad, is an authentic record of his exploits and his sway over most of the continent.
Samudragupta was not only a talented military leader but also a great patron of art and literature. The important scholars present in his court were Harishena, Vasubandhu and Asanga. He was a poet and musician himself. He was a firm believer in Hinduism and is known to have worshipped Lord Vishnu. He was considerate of other religions and allowed Sri Lanka’s Buddhist king Sirimeghvanna to build a monastery at Bodh Gaya. That monastery was called by Xuanzang as the Mahabodhi Sangharama. He provided a gold railing around the Bodhi Tree.
>> Ramagupta
Although, the narrative of the Devichandragupta is not supported by any contemporary epigraphical evidence, the historicity of Rama Gupta is proved by his Durjanpur inscriptions on three Jaina images, where he is mentioned as the Maharajadhiraja. A large number of his copper coins also have been found from the Eran-Vidisha region and classified in five distinct types, which include the Garuda, Garudadhvaja, lion and border legend types. The Brahmi legends on these coins are written in the early Gupta style. In opinion of art historian Dr. R. A. Agarawala, D. Litt., Rama Gupta may be the eldest son of Samudra Gupta. He became king because of being the eldest. It may be a possibility that he was dethroned because of not being the worthy enough to rule and his younger brother Chandra Gupta II took over.
>> Chandragupta II “Vikramaditya”
According to the Gupta records, amongst his many sons, Samudragupta nominated prince Chandra Gupta II, born of queen Dattadevi, as his successor. Chandra Gupta II, Vikramaditya (the Sun of Power), ruled from 380 until 413. Chandra Gupta II also married to a Kadamba princess of Kuntala region and a princess of Naga lineage (Nāgakulotpannnā), Kuberanaga. His daughter Prabhavatigupta from this Naga queen was married to Rudrasena II, the Vakataka ruler of Deccan. His son Kumaragupta I was married to Kadamba princess of Karnataka region. Emperor Chandra Gupta II expanded his realm westwards, defeating the Saka Western Kshatrapas of Malwa, Gujarat and Saurashtra in a campaign lasting until 409, but with his main opponent Rudrasimha III defeated by 395, and crushing the Bengal (Vanga) chiefdoms. This extended his control from coast-to-coast, established a second capital at Ujjain and was the high point of the empire.
Despite the creation of the empire through war, the reign is remembered for its very influential style of Hindu art, literature, culture and science, especially during the reign of Chandra Gupta II. Some excellent works of Hindu art such as the panels at the Dashavatara Temple in Deogarh serve to illustrate the magnificence of Gupta art. Above all it was the synthesis of elements that gave Gupta art its distinctive flavour. During this period, the Guptas were supportive of thriving Buddhist and Jain cultures as well, and for this reason there is also a long history of non-Hindu Gupta period art. In particular, Gupta period Buddhist art was to be influential in most of East and Southeast Asia. Many advances were recorded by the Chinese scholar and traveller Faxian (Fa-hien) in his diary and published afterwards.
The court of Chandragupta was made even more illustrious by the fact that it was graced by the Navaratna (Nine Jewels), a group of nine who excelled in the literary arts. Amongst these men was the immortal Kalidasa whose works dwarfed the works of many other literary geniuses, not only in his own age but in the ages to come. Kalidasa was particularly known for his fine exploitation of the shringara (romantic) element in his verse.
Chandragupta II’s Campaigns against Foreign Tribes
4th century CE Sanskrit poet Kalidasa, credits Chandragupta Vikramaditya with having conquered about twenty one kingdoms, both in and outside India. After finishing his campaign in the East and West India, Vikramaditya (Chandragupta II) proceeded northwards, subjugated the Parasikas (Persians), then the Hunas and the Kambojas tribes located in the west and east Oxus valleys respectively. Thereafter, the king proceeds across the Himalaya and reduced the Kinnaras, Kiratas etc. and lands into India proper.
The Brihatkathamanjari of the Kashmiri writer Kshmendra states, king Vikramaditya (Chandra Gupta II) had “unburdened the sacred earth of the Barbarians like the Sakas, Mlecchas, Kambojas, Yavanas, Tusharas, Parasikas, Hunas, etc. by annihilating these sinful Mlecchas completely”.
Fa-Hien
In 399, Fa-Hien, a Chinese Buddhist, came to India to study the sacred writings of Buddhism. In the 10 years he was there, he wrote about life under the Gupta emperors. His writings form one of the most important sources for the history of this period.
>> Kumaragupta I
Chandragupta II was succeeded by his second son Kumaragupta I, born of Mahadevi Dhruvasvamini. Kumaragupta I assumed the title, Mahendraditya. He ruled until 455. Towards the end of his reign a tribe in the Narmada valley, the Pushyamitras, rose in power to threaten the empire.
>> Skandagupta & SidharthaGupta
Skandagupta, son and successor of Kumaragupta I is generally considered to be the last of the great Gupta rulers. He assumed the titles of Vikramaditya and Kramaditya. He defeated the Pushyamitra threat, but then was faced with invading Hephthalites or “White Huns”, known in India as the Sweta Huna, from the northwest. He repulsed a Huna attack c. 455 CE, But the expense of the wars drained the empire’s resources and contributed to its decline. Skandagupta died in 467 and was succeeded by his agnate brother Purugupta.
>> Decline of the Gupta empire
Skandagupta was followed by weak rulers Purugupta (467–473), Kumaragupta II (473–476), Budhagupta (476–495?), Narasimhagupta, Kumaragupta III, Vishnugupta, Vainyagupta and Bhanugupta. In the 480’s the Hephthalites broke through the Gupta defenses in the northwest, and much of the empire in northwest was overrun by the Hun by 500. The empire disintegrated under the attacks of Toramana and his successor Mihirakula. It appears from inscriptions that the Guptas, although their power was much diminished, continued to resist the Huns. The Hun invader Toramana was defeated by Bhanugupta in 510 CE. The Huns were defeated and driven out of India in 528 AD by a coalition consisting of Gupta emperor Narasimhagupta and the king Yashodharman from Malwa. The succession of the sixth-century Guptas is not entirely clear, but the tail end recognized ruler of the dynasty’s main line was king Vishnugupta, reigning from 540 to 550. In addition to the Hun invasion, the factors, which contribute to the decline of the empire include competition from the Vakatakas and the rise of Yashodharman in Malwa.
>> Military organization
The Imperial Guptas could have achieved their successes through force of arms with an efficient martial system. Historically, the best accounts of this come not from the Hindus themselves but from Chinese and Western observers. However, a contemporary Indian document, regarded as a military classic of the time, the Siva-Dhanur-veda, offers some insight into the military system of the Guptas.
The Guptas seem to have relied heavily on infantry archers, and the bow was one of the dominant weapons of their army. The Hindu version of the longbow was composed of metal, or more typically bamboo, and fired a long bamboo cane arrow with a metal head. Unlike the composite bows of Western and Central Asian foes, bows of this design would be less prone to warping in the damp and moist conditions often prevalent to the region. The Indian longbow was reputedly a powerful weapon capable of great range and penetration and provided an effective counter to invading horse archers. Iron shafts were used against armored elephants and fire arrows were also part of the bowmen’s arsenal. India historically has had a prominent reputation for its steel weapons. One of these was the steel bow. Due to its high tensility, the steel bow was capable of long range and penetration of exceptionally thick armor. These were less common weapons than the bamboo design and found in the hands of noblemen rather than in the ranks. Archers were frequently protected by infantry equipped with shields, javelins, and longswords. The Guptas also had knowledge of siegecraft, catapults, and other sophisticated war machines.
The Guptas apparently showed little predilection for using horse archers, despite the fact these warriors were a main component in the ranks of their Scythian, Parthian, and Hepthalite (Huna) enemies. However, the Gupta armies were probably better disciplined. Able commanders like Samudragupta and Chandragupta II would have likely understood the need for combined armed tactics and proper logistical organization. Gupta military success likely stemmed from the concerted use of elephants, armored cavalry, and foot archers in tandem against both Hindu kingdoms and foreign armies invading from the Northwest. The Guptas also maintained a navy, allowing them to control regional waters.
The collapse of the Gupta Empire in the face of the Huna onslaught was due not directly to the inherent defects of the Gupta army, which after all had initially defeated these people under Skandagupta. More likely, internal dissolution sapped the ability of the Guptas to resist foreign invasion, as was simultaneously occurring in Western Europe and China.
During the reign of Chandragupta II, Gupta empire maintained a large army consisting of 500,000 infantry, 50,000 cavalry, 20,000 charioteers and 10,000 elephants along with a powerful navy with more than 1200 ships. Chandragupta II controlled the whole of the Indian subcontinent; the Gupta empire was the most powerful empire in the world during his reign, at a time when the Roman Empire in the west was in decline.
>> Gupta administration
A study of the epigraphical records of the Gupta empire shows that there was a hierarchy of administrative divisions from top to bottom. The empire was called by various names such as Rajya, Rashtra, Desha, Mandala, Prithvi and Avani. It was divided into 26 provinces, which were styled as Bhukti, Pradesha and Bhoga. Provinces were also divided into Vishayas and put under the control of the Vishayapatis. A Vishayapati administered the Vishaya with the help of the Adhikarana (council of representatives), which comprised four representatives: Nagarasreshesthi, Sarthavaha, Prathamakulika and Prathama Kayastha. A part of the Vishaya was called Vithi. There were also trade links of Gupta business with the Roman empire.
>> Legacy of the Gupta Empire
Scholars of this period include Varahamihira and Aryabhata, who is believed to be the first to come up with the concept of zero, postulated the theory that the Earth moves round the Sun, and studied solar and lunar eclipses. Kalidasa, who was a great playwright, who wrote plays such as Shakuntala, which is said to have inspired Goethe, and marked the highest point of Sanskrit literature is also said to have belonged to this period. The famous Sushruta Samhita, which is a Sanskrit redaction text on all of the major concepts of ayurvedic medicine with innovative chapters on surgery, dates to the Gupta period.
Chess is said to have originated in this period, where its early form in the 6th century was known as caturaṅga, which translates as “four divisions [of the military]” – infantry, cavalry, elephants, and chariotry – represented by the pieces that would evolve into the modern pawn, knight, rook, and bishop, respectively. Doctors also invented several medical instruments, and even performed operations. The Indian numerals which were the first positional base 10 numeral systems in the world originated from Gupta India. The ancient Gupta text Kama Sutra is widely considered to be the standard work on human sexual behavior in Sanskrit literature written by the Indian scholar Vatsyayana. Aryabhata, a noted mathematician-astronomer of the Gupta period proposed that the earth is not flat, but is instead round and rotates about its own axis. He also discovered that the Moon and planets shine by reflected sunlight. Instead of the prevailing cosmogony in which eclipses were caused by pseudo-planetary nodes Rahu and Ketu, he explained eclipses in terms of shadows cast by and falling on Earth.
>> Art
The Gupta period is generally regarded as a classic peak of north Indian art for all the major religious groups. Although painting was evidently widespread, the surviving works are almost all religious sculpture. The period saw the emergence of the iconic carved stone deity in Hindu art, as well as the Buddha figure and Jain tirthankara figures, these last often on a very large scale. The two great centres of sculpture were Mathura and Gandhara, the latter the centre of Greco-Buddhist art. Both exported sculpture to other parts of northern India. Unlike the preceding Kushan Empire there was no artistic depiction of the monarchs, even in the very fine Guptan coinage, with the exception of some coins of the Western Satraps, or influenced by them.
The most famous remaining monuments in a broadly Guptan style, the caves at Ajanta, Elephanta, and Ellora (respectively Buddhist, Hindu, and mixed including Jain) were in fact produced under later dynasties, but largely reflect the monumentality and balance of Guptan style. Ajanta contains by far the most important survivals of painting from this and the surrounding periods, showing a mature style which had probably had a long development, mainly in painting palaces. The Hindu Udayagiri Caves actually record connections with the dynasty and its ministers, and the Dashavatara Temple at Deogarh is a major temple, one of the earliest to survive, with important sculpture.
>> Timeline
320 : Chandragupta I founds the Gupta Empire.Chandragupta wins many battles against many northern emperors.
330-376 : Samudragupta expands the empire from the Indus River to the Bay of Bengal, and up into the northern mountains.
376-415 : Chandragupta II makes the empire secure, and encourages trade.
415-450 : Kalidas composes most of his poetry in the reign of Kumargupta(415-455).
450 : Empire begin to collapse under pressure from invading Huns.
554 : The Gupta dynasty ends when the last emperor Shashakgupta dies.

Rajput saved India to become Middle east Muslim country


सन 712 ई० में अरबों ने सिंध पर आधिकार जमा कर भारत पर विजय पाने की ठान ली। इस काल में न तो कोई केन्द्रीय सत्ता थी और न कोई बुद्धिमान और कूटनीतिक शासक था जो अरबों की इस चुनौती का सामना करता। फ़लतः अरबों ने आक्रमणो की बाढ ला दी और सन 725 ई० में जैसलमेर, मारवाड, मांडलगढ और भडौच आदि इलाकों पर अपना आधिकार जमा लिया। ऐसे लगने लगा कि शीघ्र ही मध्य पूर्व की भांति भारत में भी इस्लाम का कहर बरसने लगेगा । ऐसे समय में दो शक्तियों का वरदान साबित हुई भारत को बचाने के लिए । एक ओर जहां नागभाट ने जैसलमेर. मारवाड, मांडलगढ से अरबों को खदेड कर जालौर में प्रतिहार राज्य की नींव डाली, वहां दूसरी ओर बप्पा रायडे ने चित्तौड के प्रसिद्ध दुर्ग पर अधिकार कर सन 734 ई० में मेवाड में गुहिल वंश को स्थापित किया और इस प्रकार अरबों के भारत विजय के मनसूबों पर पानी फ़ेर दिया।
मेवाड का गुहिल वंश संसार के प्राचीनतम राज वंशों में माना जाता है। मेवाड राज्य की केन्द्रीय सत्ता का पवित्र स्थल सौराष्ट्र रहा है। जिसकी राजधानी बल्लभीपुर थी और जिसके शासक सूर्य वंशी क्षत्रिय कहलात्र थे। यही सत्ता विस्थापन के बाद जब ईडर में स्थापित हुई तो गहलौत मान से प्रचलित हुई। ईडर से मेवाड स्थापित होने पर रावल गहलौत हो गई। कालान्तर में इसकी एक शाखा सिसोदे की जागीर की स्थापना करके सिसोदिया हो गई। चुंकि यह केन्द्रीय रावल गहलौत शाखा कनिष्ठ थी। इसलिय्र इसे राणा की उपाधि मिली। उन दिनों राजपुताना में यह परम्परा थी कि लहुरी शाखा को राणा उपाधि से सम्बोधित किया जाता था। कुछ पीढियों बाद एक युद्ध में रावल शाखा का अन्त हो गया और मेवाड की केन्द्रीय सत्ता पर सिसोदिया राणा का आधिपत्य हो गया। केन्द्र और उपकेन्द्र पहचान के लिए केन्द्रीय सत्ता के राणा महाराणा हो गये। अस्तु गहलौत वंश का इतिहास ही सिसोदिया वंश का इतिहास है।
मान्यता है कि सिसोदिया क्षत्रिय भगवान राम के कनिष्ठ पुत्र लव के वंशज हैं। सूर्यवंश के आदि पुरुष की 65 वीं पीढी में भगवान राम हुए 195 वीं पीढी में वृहदंतक हुये। 125 वीं पीढी में सुमित्र हुये। 155 वी. पीढी अर्थात सुमित्र की 30 वीं पीढी में गुहिल हु जो गहलोत वंश की संस्थापक पुरुष कहलाये। गुहिल से कुछ पीढी पहले कनकसेन हुए जिन्होंने सौराष्ट्र में सूर्यवंश के राज्य की स्थापना की। गुहिल का समय 540 ई० था। बटवारे में लव को श्री राम द्वारा उत्तरी पश्चिमी क्षेत्र मिला जिसकी राजधानी लवकोट थी। जो वर्तमान में लाहौर है। ऐसा कहा जाता है कि कनकसेन लवकोट से ही द्वारका आये। हालांकि वोश्वस्त प्रमाण नहीं है। टाड मानते है कि 145 ई० में कनकसेन द्वारका आये तथा वहां अपने राज्य की परमार शासक को पराजित कर स्थापना की जिसे आज सौराष्ट्र क्षेत्र कहा जाता है। कनकसेन की चौथी पीढी में पराक्रमी शासक सौराष्ट्र के विजय सेन हुए जिन्होने विजय नगर बसाया। विजय सेन ने विदर्भ की स्थापना की थी। जिसे आज सिहोर कहते हैं। तथा राजधानी बदलकर बल्लभीपुर ( वर्तमान भावनगर ) बनाया। इस वंश के शासकों की सूची कर्नल टाड देते हुए कनकसेन, महामदन सेन, सदन्त सेन, विजय सेन, पद्मादित्य, सेवादित्य, हरादित्य, सूर्यादित्य, सोमादित्य और शिला दित्य बताया। – 524 ई० में बल्लभी का अन्तिम शासक शिलादित्य थे। हालांकि कुछ इतिहासकार 766 ई० के बाद शिलादित्य के शासन का पतन मानते हैं। यह पतन पार्थियनों के आक्रमण से हुआ। शिलादित्य की राजधानी पुस्पावती के कोख से जन्मा पुत्र गुहादित्य की सेविका ब्रहामणी कमलावती ने लालन पालन किया। क्योंकि रानी उनके जन्म के साथ ही सती हो गई। गुहादित्य बचपन से ही होनहार था और ईडर के भील मंडालिका की हत्या करके उसके सिहांसन पर बैठ गया तथा उसके नाम से गुहिल, गिहील या गहलौत वंश चल पडा। कर्नल टाड के अनुसार गुहादित्य की आठ पीढियों ने ईडर पर शासन किया ये निम्न हैं – गुहादित्य, नागादित्य, भागादित्य, दैवादित्य, आसादित्य, कालभोज, गुहादित्य, नागादित्य।
जेम्स टाड के अनुसार शिकार के बहाने भीलों द्वारा नागादित्य की हत्या कर दी। इस समय इसके पुत्र बप्पा की आयु मात्र तीन वर्ष की थी। बप्पा की भी एक ब्राहमणी ने संरक्षण देकर अरावली के बीहड में शरण लिया। गौरीशंकर ओझा गुहादित्य और बप्पा के बीच की वंशावली प्रस्तुत की, वह सर्वाधिक प्रमाणिक मानी गई है जो निम्न है – गुहिल, भोज, महेन्द्र, नागादित्य, शिलादित्य, अपराजित, महेन्द्र द्वितीय और कालभोज बप्पा आदि। यह एक संयोग ही है कि गुहादित्य और मेवाड राज्य में गहलोत वंश स्थापित करने वाले बप्पा का बचपन अरावली के जंगल में उन्मुक्त, स्वच्छन्द वातावरण में व्यतीत हुआ। बप्पा के एक लिंग पूजा के कारण देवी भवानी का दर्शन उन्हे मिला और बाबा गोरखनाथ का आशिर्वाद भी। बडे होने पर चित्तौड के राजा से मिल कर बप्पा ने अपना वंश स्थापित किया और परमार राजा ने उन्हे पूरा स्नेह दिया। इसी समय विदेशी आक्रमणकारियों के आक्रमण को बप्पा ने विफ़ल कर चित्तोड से उन्हे गजनी तक खदेड कर अपने प्रथम सैन्य अभिमान में ही सफ़लता प्राप्त की। बप्पा द्वारा धारित रावल उपाधि रावल रणसिंह ( कर्ण सिंह ) 1158 ई० तक निर्वाध रुप से चलती रही। रावण रण सिंह के बाद रावल गहलोत की एक शाखा और हो गई। जो सिसोदिया के जागीर पर आसीन हुई जिसके संस्थापक माहव एवं राहप दो भाई थे। सिसोदा में बसने के कारण ये लोग सिसोदिया गहलौत कहलाये।
सत्ता परिवर्तन, स्थान परिवर्तन, व्यक्तिगत महत्वकांक्षा एवं राजपरिवार में संख्या वृद्धि से ही राजपूत वंशों में अनेक शाखाओं एवं उपशाखाओं ने जन्म लिया है। यह बाद गहलौत वंश के साथ भी देखने को मिली है। बप्पा के शासन काल मेवाड राज्य के विस्तार के साथ ही उसकी प्रतिष्ठा में भी अत्यधिक वृद्धि हुई है। बप्पा के बाद गहलौत वंश की शाखाओं का निम्न विकास हुआ।
1. अहाडिया गहलौत – अहाड नामक स्थान पर बसने के कारण यह नाम हुआ।
2. असिला गहलौत – सौराष्ट्र में बप्पा के पुत्र ने असिलगढ का निर्माण अपने नाम असिल पर किया जिससे इसका नाम असिला पडा।
3. पीपरा गहलौत – बप्पा के एक पुत्र मारवाड के पीपरा पर आधिपत्य पर पीपरा गहलौत वंश चलाया।
4. मागलिक गहलौत – लोदल के शासक मंगल के नाम पर यह वंश चला।
5. नेपाल के गहलोत – रतन सिंह के भाई कुंभकरन ने नेपाल में आधिपत्य किया अतः नेपाल का राजपरिवार भी मेवाढ की शाखा है।
6. सखनियां गहलौत – रतन सिंह के भाई श्रवण कुमार ने सौराष्ट्र में इस वंश की स्थापना की।
7. सिसौद गहलौत – कर्णसिंह के पुत्र को सिसौद की जागीर मिली और सिसौद के नाम पर सिसौदिया गहलौत कहलाया।

MAHARAJA HARI SINGH

MAHARAJA HARI SINGH : THE LAST RULER OF JAMMU & KASHMIR By. Col. J.P. Singh (Retd).


Maharaja Hari Singh  was born on 23rd Sept 1895 in Amar Mahal Jammu which is a museum of world fame and most popular tourist attraction in Jammu. He was son of Raja General Amar Singhji; younger brother of Maharaja Partap Singh. He ascended to the throne of Jammu & Kashmir State in 1925 after the demise of Maharaja Sir Partap Singh. He was one of the most renowned ruler of British India as well as  Indian Union as a ruler of geographically largest and strategically most important empire of Jammu & Kashmir which continues to remain in the lime light for several political and historical reasons. He gained acclamation for being “The Last Ruling King of Independent India” since he continued to be Maharaja of Jammu & Kashmir till 5th  November 1952 while all other rulers of princely states had seized to be Kings by 1948.
When he was 13 years old he was sent to ‘Mayo College of Princes’ for studies. Soon after his admission in the Mayo College his father Raja Amar Singhji died . After his father’s death, British Govt in Delhi took keen interest in his education and bringing up. A British Army Officer was deputed as his guardian with the responsibility of ensuring proper education and training with the aim of grooming him to be a good ruler. After completing his education in Mayo College he was sent to ‘Imperial Cadet Corps’ at Dehradun to imbibe in him Military and  Martial traits as well as polishing his English language. Maharaja Hari Singh married Maharani Tara Devi in 1928 as his fourth wife after his previous three wives had died earlier one after the other without an issue. This marriage was on the advice of the astrologers and true to their prediction a Yuvraj was born to them on 9 March 1931 as the next Heir Apparent.
In 1915 he was appointed Commander-in-Chief of J&K State Forces when he was only 20 years old. On assuming command of the state forces, he introduced lot of reforms in the training and welfare of officers and soldiers. Central cook houses called Langars and Officers Messes were introduced by him in the state force prior to which the officers and jawans used to cook their own meals.  During the reign of Maharaja Partap Singh Union Jack used to fly on all official buildings of the State. Maharaja Hari Singh ordered their removal which was contested by the British govt but he didn’t relent. Later, on Viceroy’s request he allowed a British flag to be flown only on the residential building of the Resident thereby exerting his full authority over his sate.
His rule has been described as glorious by British historians because of several reforms that he introduced in administration and judiciary. After ascending to the throne he brought about several rules and regulations for the welfare and betterment of his subjects. There are numerous instances worth mentioning but few of them such as making primary education compulsory for all subjects; men & women, prohibiting child marriage and opening all the places of worship for his low caste subjects are most remarkable. He opened lot of new schools and colleges to promote education.  He managed to check corruption in the administration by adopting unique ways of detecting corruption, findings culprit officials and punishing them. He banned  beggar and it is said that during his rule none dared to accept bribes or deny wages for any  services rendered. He even ploughed land himself to get land holding rights to his subjects. He was made a member of the Imperial War Council from 1944 to 1946 during the World War II. During the war he visited Middle East where he joined his units which were fighting against Axis Powers. He lived with them in their temporary trenches and bunkers which encouraged them and boosted their moral. Showing his solidarity with his forces in the battlefield earned him lot of respect not only of his men but also of the Allied Powers particularly of the British Army.
Hari Singh’s rule witnessed lot of political upheavals. From 1931 onwards his rule faced Kashmiri insurrection against his rule which became a mass movement in the valley under the leadership of Sheikh Mohd Abdullah. He opposed Jinnah’s Muslim League for its communal agenda illustrated in his two nation theory; hence faced his wrath. He was victim of hostility of Indian National Congress because of Pt Nehru and Sheikh Mohd Abdullah. Immediately after independence and partition of India he saw the tragic communal riots which engulfed the State of Jammu & Kashmir as well. It was followed by an invasion of his State by Pakistani raiders. Jammu & Kashmir had become an  independent country after the lapse of British Paramountacy on 15 Aug 1947. It was during his reign that the first Indo-Pak war was fought on the soil of Jammu & Kashmir. Finally the Govt of India took over the control of J&K thus ending the 106 years old hereditary rule of the last Maharaja of India on 15th  November 1952.
Maharaja Hari Singh was a democratic and progressive ruler and knew what was to come. He had made it clear in the Round Table Conference in London that he was for independence of India for which he had to pay heavily as Britishers never trusted him thereafter. As a result he had to face many uprisings fomented and abetted  by the British. He also knew that the era of the dynastic rule was to end soon for which he prepared his son to fit in the future democratic set up of the country. Dr Karan Singh bears  testimony to it as he became the first elected head of the State as a Sadar-i-Riyasat and later Union Minister for many years and is still a Member of Parliament even 63 years after the transfer of power. In fact he should have been the President of India today. Hopefully next time. The credit for preparing him for the distinguished career in the changed political scenario goes to him.
Lord Mountbatten visited Srinagar in June 1947. He advised Maharaja Hari Singh to accede to Pakistan on the grounds of religion of majority population and geographical contiguity. Although the advice amounted to be an order because the state was part of the Dominion.  Maharaja ignored this advice and instead wanted more time to decide the future of his State. He knew that Pt Nehru and Sheikh Abdullah were for State’s accession to India which was his wish as well. But all the rail and land routes to J&K passed through Pakistan. Despite Gurdaspur District falling part of India and River Ravi becoming the boundary line, there was no road or rail link to India through Pathankot which hindered Maharaja’s early decision of accession to India. But Pt Nehru took keen interest in the development of road link to Jammu facilitating accession. When India gained independence he had the option of joining either  India or Pakistan or to remain independent. He knew the consequences of all the options for which he offered Standstill Agreement with both the Dominions, which unfortunately was not accepted by Pt Nehru which changed the course of history. Had Pt Nehru accepted it, it would have given India over two months to understand the problems of the most strategic State of the world and prepare  for anything untoward from any direction. It might have perhaps averted Pakistani attack in Oct 47 as the State would have been the joint responsibility of both the Dominions. However following the invasion by Pakistan on 21 October 1947 he appealed  to the Indian Union for help. India refused  unless he acceded to the Indian Union. He signed the instrument of accession with the govt of India on 26 October 1947 acceding his country to the Indian Union which included Jammu, Kashmir, Northern Areas, Ladakh, Trans Karakoram Tract, POK and Aksai Chin. The events mentioned above leading to the accession with Indian Union created Indo-Pak hostility which has resulted into 4 military conflicts and the ongoing proxy war in Kashmir. Due to unresolved and undemocratic nature of transition all the territories mentioned above are considered disputed.
Due to growing hostility with his Prime Minister Sheikh Abdullah, he appointed his son Yuvraj Karan Singh as his regent and left for Bombay in 1949, never to return to his State there after. He spent rest of his life in Bombay. His passions for Polo, Horse Racing and Reading kept him occupied for the remaining period of life. Lt Gen His Highness Shriman Rajrajeshwar Maharajadhiraj Sri Sir Hari Singh Indar Mahindar Bahadur Sipar-i-Sultanat, GCSI, GCIE, GCVO, KCVO, Maharaja of Jammu & Kashmir breathed his last on 26 April 1961 at Bombay. As per his will his Ashes were brought to Jammu and spread all over J&K and immersed in River Tawi at Jammu.
Amar Kshatriya Rajput Sabha is remembering the beloved rulers by celebrating his 115th Birth Anniversary  on 23 September 2010 at Raj Tilak Bhavan Purani Mandi Jammu.


महाराजा हरि सिंह के राज्याभिषेक का दुर्लभ वीडियो
जम्मू-काश्मीर के अंतिम नरेश महाराजा हरि सिंह (Colonel His Highness Shriman Rajrajeshwar Maharajadhiraj Sri Sir Hari Singh Indar Mahindar Bahadur, Sipar-i-Sultanat, Maharaja of Jammu and Kashmir, KCIE, KCVO : 1925-1961) के राज्याभिषेक का दुर्लभ वीडियो (सितम्बर, 1925)

Europeans crooked History of India


पश्चिम एसिया और भारत-भारतीय इतिहास में अंग्रेजों द्वारा इतनी भयानक जालसाजी हुयी है कि कोई भी वर्णन पश्चिम या मध्य एसिया के इतिहास से नहीं मिलता है और पूर्व भाग के बारे में बिलकुल ही भूल गये। राजतरंगिणी के अनुसार गोनन्द वंश का ६२वां राजा हिरण्यकुल था जिसने लौकिकाब्द २२५२-२३१२ अर्थात् ८२४-७६४ ई.पू. तक शासन किया। उसका पुत्र वसुकुल (७६४-७०४) तथा मिहिरकुल (७०४-६३४) ई.पू. था। उसके पूर्व इसी गोनन्द वंश का ५१वां शासक हुष्क था जिसके पुत्रों जुष्क और कनिष्क ने १२९४-१२३४ ई.पू. तक शासन किया। कनिष्क को उज्जैन के परमारवंशी राजा विक्रमादित्य (८२ ई.पू. -१९ ई) के पौत्र शालिवाहन (७८-१२८ ई.) के शक से जोड़ कर परमार वंश का नाम उड़ा दिया। यदि यह जालसाजी सही है तो सम्पूर्ण बाइबिल और इसाई इतिहास झूठा हो जायेगा। प्रायः ४ ई.पू. में विक्रमादित्य राज्य के मगध से २ ज्योतिषी गये थे जिन्होंने ईसा को महापुरुष बताया था। उस समय विक्रमादित्य और इजरायल के रोमन राज्य के बीच कोई अन्य राज्य नहीं था। शूली पर बेहोश हो कर उतरने के बाद ईसा मसीह कश्मीर आये जिनका निवास हजरत बल (बहाल = रहना) कहा जाता है। यह शालिवाहन राज्य में हुआ। इसाई मान्यता के अनुसार ईसा के शिष्य थोमस ८२ ई. में मद्रास (चेन्नई) आये थे (शालिवाहन शक के ४ वर्ष बाद)। अतः उस समय भारत आश्रय स्थल था, आक्रमण का शिकार नहीं था।
उससे पूर्व असीरिया का उदय नबोनासर काल में होने पर भारत पर पहला आक्रमण ८२४ ई.पू. में हुआ जिसका प्रतिरोध खारावेल की गज सेना ने मथुरा में किया (खारावेल प्रशस्ति, शासन के ४ वर्ष बाद नन्द शक १६३४ ई.पू. का ८०३ वर्ष, राज्य के ११ वर्ष पर मथुरा में शकों की पराजय)। यह विफल होने पर रानी सेमिरामी (ग्रीक नाम) ने सभी पड़्सी राज्यों की सहायता से ३५ लाख की सेना इकट्ठी की तथा ऊंटों को खोल पहना कर १०,००० नकली हाथी तैयार किये (होमर के ट्राय या भास के स्वप्नवासवदत्ता की तरह)। यह असुरों का सबसे बड़ा आक्रमण था जिसके प्रतिरोध के लिये विष्णु अवतार बुद्ध मगध में अजिन ब्राह्मण के पुत्र रूप में उत्पन्न हुये। सिद्धार्थ बुद्ध (१८८७-१८०७ ई.पू.) ने मगध राजाओं से दोस्ती कर केवल सारनाथ-गया के बीच के लोगों को मोहित किया था, असुरों को नहीं। उसके बाद गौतम बुद्ध (५वी सदी ई.पू.) ने वैदिक मार्ग नष्ट करने के लिये उत्तर प्रदेश में प्रयत्न किये। इन दोनों ने केवल वेद का विरोध किया असुरों का नहीं।
विष्णु बुद्ध ने ७५६ ई.पू. में आबू पर्वत पर ४ राजाओं का संघ राजा शूद्रक की अध्यक्षता में किया। इस समय शूद्रक शक आरम्भ हुआ (यल्ल का ज्योतिष दर्पण)। शूद्रक का नाम इन्द्राणीगुप्त (मृच्छकटिकम्) था, ब्राह्मण होने पर भी ४ राजाओं का प्रधान सेवक (जैसे आज प्रधान मन्त्री अपने को कहते हैं) होने के कारण उनको सम्मान के लिये शूद्र कहा गया। ४ जो भारत रक्षा में अग्रणी होने के कारण अग्निवंशी कहे गये-परमार प्रतिहार, चाहमान और शुक्ल (चालुक्य)। इन सबकी वंश परम्परा ७५६ ई.पू. से आरम्भ होती है पर कर्नल टाड ने उन सभी को हूण वंशी सिद्ध करने के लिये उनका काल ७३० ई.पू कर पुराना सभी अन्धकार युग कर दिया। इसके लिये उसको राणा कुम्भा का ताम्र-पट्ट तोड़ना पड़ा जिसमें उन्होंने अपने को ब्राह्मण बप्पा रावल का वंशज कहा था जो गोरखनाथ के आदेश से राजा बने थे। यही उनके द्वारा गीतगोविन्द व्याख्या की भूमिका में भी है। स्वयं गोरखनाथ को भी लुप्त कर यह शंकराचार्य का काल कर दिया जो अंग्रेजों के अनुसार मुस्लिम आक्रमण होने पर बौद्धों का विरोध कर रहे थे। सबसे बड़े असुर आक्रमण (७५६ ई.पू. सेमिरामी की ३५ लाख सेना + घुड़सवार+नकली हाथी प्रायः ४ लाख) को इसी संघ ने पराजित किया। सभी पाश्चात्य इतिहास इसका वर्णन करते हैं पर भारत में इसके २०० वष बाद से राज्य व्यवस्था कही जाती है। ६१२ ई.पू. में दिल्ली के चाहमान राजा ने असुर (असीरिया) राजधानी निनेवे को पूरी तरह ध्वस्त कर दिया जिसका बाइबिल में ५ स्थानों पर वर्णन है। इस समय चाहमान शक आरम्भ हुआ जिसका प्रयोग वराहमिहिर तथा ब्रह्मगुप्त (बृहत् संहित १३/३) ने किया है। इसके बाद ४५६ ई.पू. में शक आक्रमण हुये जिनका प्रतिरोध मालवा के राजा श्रीहर्ष ने कर मालव गण समाप्त कर दिया (राजतरंगिणी, कथा सरित् सागर, अलबिरुनि आदि)। श्रीहर्ष शासन समाप्त होने पर आन्ध्र वंशी राजाओं के सेनापति घटोत्कच (मेगास्थनीज आदि ग्रीक लेखकों द्वारा इसका अनुवाद नाई किया है) ने उसे समाप्त कर अपने पुत्र चन्द्रगुप्त-१ को राजा बनाया। इस समय सिकन्दर का आक्रमण हुआ था और उसके लेखकों ने आन्ध्र राजाओं की सेना का तथा चन्द्रगुप्त समुद्रगुप्त का वर्णन किया है। उसके बाद सेल्यूकस आक्रमण का समुद्रगुप्त के इलाहाबाद स्तम्भ लेख में वर्णन है। उसके पुत्र चन्द्रगुप्त-२ ने उसे पराजित कर उसकी पुत्री से विवाह किया जिसका विस्तृत वर्णन देवी-चन्द्रगुप्तम् नाटक तथा उसके आधार पर जयशंकर प्रसाद के ध्रुवस्वामिनी नाटक (१९३० ई.) में है। गुप्त काल समाप्त होने पर ८२ ई.पू. में उज्जैन के परमार राजा विक्रमादित्य का साम्राज्य बना जिस काल में ईसा मसीह का जन्म, सीजर की पराजय, बन्दी बनना और इस कारण ब्रूटस द्वारा उसकी हत्या तथा ४६ ई,पू. मे विक्रम वर्ष १० के पौष मास से मिलाने के लिये जूलियन वर्ष ७ दिन बाद आरम्भ हुआ। उनके पौत्र शालिवाहन काल में ईसा तथा उनके शिष्यों ने भारत में शरण लिया। गणना के लिये शालिवाहन शक तथा पर्व के लिये विक्रम सम्वत् आज भी चल रहे हैं। शक सम्वत्सर का अर्थ नहीं समझने वालों द्वारा बनाया गया राष्ट्रीय-शक-सम्वत् न तो राष्ट्रीय है, न शक है, न सम्वत् है। विक्रमादित्य राज्य के बाद कुछ समय विप्लव स्थिति थी जब (१९-३० ई.) में तातार, तुर्क, हूण और चीनी लोगों ने आक्रमण किये जिनका तिब्बत तथा चीन इतिहास में भी उल्लेख है। इस समय गुप्तवंश की एक शाखा ने गुजरात के वलभी में राज्य स्थापित किया, जिसके नष्ट होने पर ३१९ ई. में वलभी भङ्ग शक आरम्भ हुआ (अलबिरुनि)। प्रायः इसी समय अंग्रेजों ने मूल गुप्त राज्य का आरम्भ कर दिया है।
जिस समय हूण शकों का आक्रमण कहा जाता है उस समय उत्तर भारत में हर्षवर्धन तथा अग्निवंशी राजाओं का शासन था। हुएनसांग या फाहियान ने इस काल में किसी शक आक्रमण का नाम नही सुना था जो मध्य एसिया रास्ते से ही आये थे।

Beef, cow -Why not to slaughter, Benefits of cow


हमारा देश लम्बे समय तक अंग्रेंजो का गुलाम रहा ,सेकड़ो वर्षो तक इस
देश को अंग्रेंजो ने गुलाम बनाने
की काफी तैयारी की थी
सन 1813 में अंग्रेंजो की संसद हाउस ऑफ़ कॉमन्स में एक
बहस चली 24 जुन 1813 को वो बहस पूरी हुई
और वहाँ से एक प्रस्ताव पारित किया
भारत में गरीबी पैदा करनी है
भुखमरी लानी है भारत
की समृदि को तोडन है इनको यदि शारीरिक और
मानसिक रूप से कमज़ोर करना है
तो भारत की अर्थव्यवस्था को कमज़ोर करना पड़ेगा इसे बरबाद
करना पड़ेगा
इसके लिय भारत का केन्द्र बिन्दु भारत
की कृषि पद्धति को भी बरबाद करना पड़ेगा । भारत
की अर्थव्यवस्था काफी हद तक कृषि पर
टिकी हुई है
इनकी कृषि गाय पर टिकी हुई है गाय के
बिना भारतीय कृषि हो नहीं सकती
दूसरा इनको ये पता चला के भारत के कोने कोने में गाय
की पूजा होती है इनके 33 करोड़
देवी देवता इसमें वास करते है
तब उन्होंने एक बढ़ा फैसला लिया यदि भारतीय कृषि को बरबाद
करना है भारतीय संस्कृति का नाश करना है तो गाय का नाश
करना चाहिय
भारत मे पहला गौ का कत्लखाना 1707 ईस्वी में रॉबर्ट क्लाएव
ने खोला था जिसमें गाय को काट कर उसके मॉस को अंग्रेंजी फोज़
को खिलाया जाने लगा
गो वंश का नाश शुरू हो गया।
बीच दौर में अंग्रेंजो को एक और महत्वपूर्ण बात
पता चली के यदि गो वंश का नाश करना है तो उसके लिय जहाँ से
इसकी उत्पति होती है उस
नन्दी को मरवाना होगा
तो अग्रेंजो ने गाय से ज्यादा नन्दी का कत्ल करवाना शुरू किया।
1857 में मंगल पाण्डे को जब फांसी सजा हुई
थी इसका मूल प्रश्न गाय
का ही था इसी मूल प्रश्न से हिन्दुस्तान में
क्रांति की शुरुआत हुई थी
उस जमाने में अंग्रेंजो ने पुरे भारत में लगभग 350 कत्लखाने खुलवाये|
1939 में लाहोर शहर में अंग्रेंजो ने एक
मशीनी कत्लखाना खोला बढे पैमाने में वहाँ गो और
नंदी का कत्ल हो सकत था
इस कत्ल खाने को बंद करने के लिय सबसे जबरदस्त आंदोलन किया पंडित
नेहरू ने और आंदोलन सफल भी हुआ
कत्लखाना बंद हो गया पंडित नेहरू ने कहा यदि वो अज़ाद हिंदुस्तान के
किसी महत्वपूर्ण पद पर पहुंचे तो वो ऐसा कानून बना देंगे जिसे
हिंदुस्तान में गाय का कत्ल बंद हो जायेगा
1939 में लाहोर शहर में अंग्रेंजो ने एक
मशीनी कत्लखाना खोला बढे पैमाने में वहाँ गो और
नंदी का कत्ल हो सकत था
इस कत्ल खाने को बंद करने के लिय सबसे जबरदस्त आंदोलन किया पंडित
नेहरू ने और आंदोलन सफल भी हुआ
कत्लखाना बंद हो गया पंडित नेहरू ने कहा यदि वो अज़ाद हिंदुस्तान के
किसी महत्वपूर्ण पद पर पहुंचे तो वो ऐसा कानून बना देंगे जिसे
हिंदुस्तान में गाय का कत्ल बंद हो जायेगा
चांस की बात नेहरू भारत के सबसे उँचे शिखर पर बैठे और
डॉ राजेन्द्र प्रसाद भारत के राष्ट्रपति बने
दुःख की बात ये है दोनों अपने शासन काल में गो के लिय ऐसा कोई
कानून ही नहीं बना पाये| बाकी बहुत
सारे कानून उन्होंने बनाये
आज अज़ादी के 67 साल में पुरे भारत में लगभग 36000
कत्लखाने है जिसमें कुछ कत्लखाने ऐसे है जिसमें 10 हज़ार पशु रोज़
काटे जाते है
भारत वर्तमान में विश्व का 3 नम्बर गो मॉस निर्यात करने वाला देश बन
गया है
भविष्य में इन कत्ल खानो को हाई टेक किया जाना है
अंग्रेंजो ने 1910 से 1940 तक लगभग 10 करोड़ से ज्यादा गो वंश
को खत्म किया गया ।
अज़ादी के 50 साल बाद 1947 से 1997 तक लगभग 48
करोड़ गो वंश का नाश किया जा चूका है
अगर भारत में इन 48 करोड़ गो वंश को यदि बचा लिया गया होता तो भारत में
सम्पति और सम्पदा कितनी होती पैसा कितना होता
एक गाय 1 साल में 25 हज़ार रुपय का फ़र्टिलाइज़र (खाद )
पैदा करती है जो हम फ़र्टिलाइज़र करोडो रुपय का आयात करते
है वो करोडो रूपया बचता
यदि 48 करोड़ गाय बचती तो हमने कितनी खाद
का नुकसान किया है
1 गाय यदि 1 साल में 10 से 15 हज़ार रुपय का दूध
देती हो तो कितने रुपय का नुकसान हुआ है गाय के दूध,मूत्र
से 108 तरह की दवाये बनती है
कैंसर,मधुमेह तक का इलाज़ है गाय के मूत्र में
भारत को पेट्रोल और डीज़ल बहार से आयात करना पढ़ता है
बायो गैस से भारत की पेट्रोल, डीज़ल,गैस सिलेंडर
और बेरोज़गारी की समस्या को भी ख़त्म
किया जा सकता है ये पशुधन