Showing posts with label MAHATMA GANDHI. Show all posts
Showing posts with label MAHATMA GANDHI. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 2, 2016

Gandhi-not a mahatama but ANti Hindu , anti Sanatan Dharma man

Shravan Krushna paksh, Amas, Kalyug Varsh 5118.
Jai Sri Krishna.
Gandhi, father of Paki and greatest Hindu traitor of all time. He was solely responsible as Hindu leader for most Hindu mass murders, mass rapes, mass looting of property and the tearing of Bharat Mata into 3 bloody pieces. No Sanatani in history of Bharat ever treated Hindu lives with as much contempt as he did. Each Hindu life is priceless. Gandhi always put, on each and every occasion concern about Mohammedan lives over Hindu lives.
Why do you think Christians make movies about him and Mohammedans have no objections about him?
What do you think King Vikramaditya's opinion would be about Hindu Gandhi? What do you think King Prithviraj Chauhan's opinion would be about Hindu Gandhi? What do you think Lord Ram's opinion would be of Hindu Gandhi? What do you think Lord Krishna's opinion would be about Hindu Gandhi?
Where in our holy literature is suicide encouraged? Where is mass suicide encouraged? Where is letting yourself be killed encouraged? Even plants turn their flowered faces to the sun. There is no animal, bird or insect that does not value it's own life. Even viruses and bacteria fight to live and multiply. Devil Incarnate Gandhi demanded Sanatanis let themselves be murdered. Gandhi asked living beings to care nothing about their God given life. To go against life is to go against the ways of the universe. To go against life is to go against God. Gandhi went against God. God only know how many billions of lives he'll be reborn paying in excruciating ways for the greatest sin of all, exhorting to let themselves be murdered by whoever, whenever, whatever.
God, Sanatani Bhagwan Ram, Sanatani Bhagwan Krishna. Sanatani Bhagwan Kalki (I use the term Sanatani because every other religion despises them and does not accept they exist) each and every one of our Sanatani Bhagwans were fierce warriors with multiple, lethal, divine weapons. Each of their life stories on earth was about an injustice that led to war. A war none of our Bhagwans shrunk from since that was sole reason for their birth on earth, in particular Bharat Mata..
The entire premise of Bhagavad Gita is complete and total war against injustice. Bhagwan Krushna scorched the earth with nuclear weapon for dharma.
What do you believe? Who do you believe? Our Bhagwans? Our Holy Scriptures? Because Gandhi went against everything Sanatana Dharma stands for yug after yug after yug. Without gandhi, we'd be singing Tulsidas's bhajan to Lord Ram as written instead of its treasonous mohammedan version by treacherous gandhi.
Just for singing Tulsidas's authentic version, instead of mohammedan version, my parents were labeled 'trouble makers' by other Sanatanis. Now I proudly follow in their footsteps and state this is only version of we have ever sung. Mohammedan version we could not even utter. This beautiful bhajan is about House of Raghupati and no one else. We also have original second version of this bhajan by Tulsidas. Pointless to post when Sanatanis ignore first.
RAGHUPATHI RAGHAVA RAJA RAM
PATHITAPAAVANA SITA-RAM
SUNDARA VIGRAHA MEGHASHYAM
GANGA TULSI SALAGRAM
BHADRA GIRISHWARA SITA-RAM
BHAKATHA JANAPRIYA SITA-RAM
JANAKI RAMANA SITA-RAM
JAI JAI RAGHAVA SITA-RAM
(JAI RAGHUNANDAN, JAI SIYA RAM
JAANAKI VALLABH SITA RAM)
Jai Hind.
Vande Mataram.

Monday, February 8, 2016

M K Gandhi decoded-गांधीः नैक्ड ऐंबिशन, Mahatma Gandi -Truth uncovered

अमृतसर के जलियाँवाला बाग़ गोली काण्ड (1919) से समस्त देशवासी आक्रोश में थे तथा चाहते थे कि इस नरसंहार के खलनायक जनरल डायर पर अभियोग चलाया जाए।
गान्धी ने भार...तवासियों के इस आग्रह को समर्थन देने से मना कर दिया।
2. भगत सिंह व उसके साथियों के मृत्युदण्ड के निर्णय से सारा देश क्षुब्ध था व गान्धी की ओर देख रहा था कि वह हस्तक्षेप कर इन देशभक्तों को मृत्यु से बचाएं, किन्तु गान्धी ने भगत सिंह की हिंसा को अनुचित ठहराते हुए जनसामान्य की इस माँग को अस्वीकार कर दिया। क्या आश्चर्य कि आज भी भगत सिंह वे अन्य क्रान्तिकारियों को आतंकवादी कहा जाता है।
3. 6 मई 1946 को समाजवादी कार्यकर्ताओं को अपने सम्बोधन में गान्धी ने मुस्लिम लीग की हिंसा के समक्ष अपनी आहुति देने की प्रेरणा दी।
4.मोहम्मद अली जिन्ना आदि राष्ट्रवादी मुस्लिम नेताओं के विरोध को अनदेखा करते हुए 1921 में गान्धी ने खिलाफ़त आन्दोलन को समर्थन देने की घोषणा की। तो भी केरल के मोपला में मुसलमानों द्वारा वहाँ के हिन्दुओं की मारकाट की जिसमें लगभग 1500 हिन्दु मारे गए व 2000 से अधिक को मुसलमान बना लिया गया। गान्धी ने इस हिंसा का विरोध नहीं किया, वरन् खुदा के बहादुर बन्दों की बहादुरी के रूप में वर्णन किया।
5.1926 में आर्य समाज द्वारा चलाए गए शुद्धि आन्दोलन में लगे स्वामी श्रद्धानन्द जी की हत्या अब्दुल रशीद नामक एक मुस्लिम युवक ने कर दी, इसकी प्रतिक्रियास्वरूप गान्धी ने अब्दुल रशीद को अपना भाई कह कर उसके इस कृत्य को उचित ठहराया व शुद्धि आन्दोलन को अनर्गल राष्ट्र-विरोधी तथा हिन्दु-मुस्लिम एकता के लिए अहितकारी घोषित किया।
6.गान्धी ने अनेक अवसरों पर छत्रपति शिवाजी, महाराणा प्रताप व गुरू गोविन्द सिंह जी को पथभ्रष्ट देशभक्त कहा।
7.गान्धी ने जहाँ एक ओर काश्मीर के हिन्दु राजा हरि सिंह को काश्मीर मुस्लिम बहुल होने से शासन छोड़ने व काशी जाकर प्रायश्चित करने का परामर्श दिया, वहीं दूसरी ओर हैदराबाद के निज़ाम के शासन का हिन्दु बहुल हैदराबाद में समर्थन किया।
8. यह गान्धी ही था जिसने मोहम्मद अली जिन्ना को कायदे-आज़म की उपाधि दी।
9. कॉंग्रेस के ध्वज निर्धारण के लिए बनी समिति (1931) ने सर्वसम्मति से चरखा अंकित भगवा वस्त्र पर निर्णय लिया किन्तु गाँधी कि जिद के कारण उसे तिरंगा कर दिया गया।
10. कॉंग्रेस के त्रिपुरा अधिवेशन में नेताजी सुभाष चन्द्र बोस को बहुमत से कॉंग्रेस अध्यक्ष चुन लिया गया किन्तु गान्धी पट्टभि सीतारमय्या का समर्थन कर रहा था, अत: सुभाष बाबू ने निरन्तर विरोध व असहयोग के कारण पदत्याग कर दिया।
11. लाहोर कॉंग्रेस में वल्लभभाई पटेल का बहुमत से चुनाव सम्पन्न हुआ किन्तु गान्धी की जिद के कारण यह पद जवाहरलाल नेहरु को दिया गया।
12. 14-15 जून, 1947 को दिल्ली में आयोजित अखिल भारतीय कॉंग्रेस समिति की बैठक
में भारत विभाजन का प्रस्ताव अस्वीकृत होने वाला था, किन्तु गान्धी ने वहाँ पहुंच प्रस्ताव का समर्थन करवाया। यह भी तब जबकि उन्होंने स्वयं ही यह कहा था कि देश का विभाजन उनकी लाश पर होगा।
13. मोहम्मद अली जिन्ना ने गान्धी से विभाजन के समय हिन्दु मुस्लिम जनसँख्या की
सम्पूर्ण अदला बदली का आग्रह किया था जिसे गान्धी ने अस्वीकार कर दिया।
14. जवाहरलाल की अध्यक्षता में मन्त्रीमण्डल ने सोमनाथ मन्दिर का सरकारी व्यय पर पुनर्निर्माण का प्रस्ताव पारित किया, किन्तु गान्धी जो कि मन्त्रीमण्डल के सदस्य भी नहीं थे ने सोमनाथ मन्दिर पर सरकारी व्यय के प्रस्ताव को निरस्त करवाया और 13 जनवरी 1948 को आमरण अनशन के माध्यम से सरकार पर दिल्ली की मस्जिदों का सरकारी खर्चे से पुनर्निर्माण कराने के लिए दबाव डाला।
15. पाकिस्तान से आए विस्थापित हिन्दुओं ने दिल्ली की खाली मस्जिदों में जब अस्थाई शरण ली तो गान्धी ने उन उजड़े हिन्दुओं को जिनमें वृद्ध, स्त्रियाँ व बालक अधिक थे मस्जिदों से से खदेड़ बाहर ठिठुरते शीत में रात बिताने पर मजबूर किया गया।
16. 22 अक्तूबर 1947 को पाकिस्तान ने काश्मीर पर आक्रमण कर दिया, उससे पूर्व माउँटबैटन ने भारत सरकार से पाकिस्तान सरकार को 55 करोड़ रुपए की राशि देने का परामर्श दिया था। केन्द्रीय मन्त्रीमण्डल ने आक्रमण के दृष्टिगत यह राशि देने को टालने का निर्णय लिया किन्तु गान्धी ने उसी समय यह राशि तुरन्त दिलवाने के लिए आमरण अनशन किया- फलस्वरूप यह राशि पाकिस्तान को भारत के हितों के विपरीत दे दी गयी।17.गाँधी ने गौ हत्या पर पर्तिबंध लगाने का विरोध किया
18. द्वितीया विश्वा युध मे गाँधी ने भारतीय सैनिको को ब्रिटेन का लिए हथियार उठा कर लड़ने के लिए प्रेरित किया , जबकि वो हमेशा अहिंसा की पीपनी बजाते है
.19. क्या ५०००० हिंदू की जान से बढ़ कर थी मुसलमान की ५ टाइम की नमाज़ ?????
विभाजन के बाद दिल्ली की जमा मस्जिद मे पानी और ठंड से बचने के लिए ५००० हिंदू ने जामा मस्जिद मे पनाह ले रखी थी…मुसलमानो ने इसका विरोध किया पर हिंदू को ५ टाइम नमाज़ से ज़यादा कीमती अपनी जान लगी.. इसलिए उस ने माना कर दिया. .. उस समय गाँधी नाम का वो शैतान बरसते पानी मे बैठ गया धरने पर की जब तक हिंदू को मस्जिद से भगाया नही जाता तब तक गाँधी यहा से नही जाएगा….फिर पुलिस ने मजबूर हो कर उन हिंदू को मार मार कर बरसते पानी मे भगाया…. और वो हिंदू— गाँधी मरता है तो मरने दो —- के नारे लगा कर वाहा से भीगते हुए गये थे…,,,
रिपोर्ट — जस्टिस कपूर.. सुप्रीम कोर्ट….. फॉर गाँधी वध क्यो ?
२०. भगत सिंह, राजगुरु और सुखदेव को 24 मार्च 1931 को फांसी लगाई जानी थी, सुबह करीब 8 बजे। लेकिन 23 मार्च 1931 को ही इन तीनों को देर शाम करीब सात बजे फांसी लगा दी गई और शव रिश्तेदारों को न देकर रातोंरात ले जाकर ब्यास नदी के किनारे जला दिए गए। असल में मुकदमे की पूरी कार्यवाही के दौरान भगत सिंह ने जिस तरह अपने विचार सबके सामने रखे थे और अखबारों ने जिस तरह इन विचारों को तवज्जो दी थी, उससे ये तीनों, खासकर भगत सिंह हिंदुस्तानी अवाम के नायक बन गए थे। उनकी लोकप्रियता से राजनीतिक लोभियों को समस्या होने लगी थी।
उनकी लोकप्रियता महात्मा गांधी को मात देनी लगी थी। कांग्रेस तक में अंदरूनी दबाव था कि इनकी फांसी की सज़ा कम से कम कुछ दिन बाद होने वाले पार्टी के सम्मेलन तक टलवा दी जाए। लेकिन अड़ियल महात्मा ने ऐसा नहीं होने दिया। चंद दिनों के भीतर ही ऐतिहासिक गांधी-इरविन समझौता हुआ जिसमें ब्रिटिश सरकार सभी राजनीतिक कैदियों को रिहा करने पर राज़ी हो गई। सोचिए, अगर गांधी ने दबाव बनाया होता तो भगत सिंह भी रिहा हो सकते थे क्योंकि हिंदुस्तानी जनता सड़कों पर उतरकर उन्हें ज़रूर राजनीतिक कैदी मनवाने में कामयाब रहती। लेकिन गांधी दिल से ऐसा नहीं चाहते थे क्योंकि तब भगत सिंह के आगे इन्हें किनारे होना पड़ता.|


गांधीजी की सेक्स लाइफ...
जी हां, महात्मा गांधी के सेक्स-जीवन को केंद्र बनाकर लिखी गई किताब “गांधीः नैक्ड ऐंबिशन” में एक ब्रिटिश प्रधानमंत्री के हवाले से ऐसा ही कहा गया है।

मशहूर ब्रिटिश इतिहासकार जैड ऐडम्स ने पंद्रह साल के अध्ययन और शोध के बाद “गांधीः नैक्ड ऐंबिशन” को किताब का रूप दिया है।
किताब में वैसे तो नया कुछ नहीं है। राष्ट्रपिता के जीवन में आने वाली महिलाओं और लड़कियों के साथ गांधी केआत्मीय और मधुर रिश्तों पर ख़ास प्रकाश डाला गया है।जैड ऐडम्स ने लिखा है कि गांधी नग्न होकर लड़कियोंऔर महिलाओं के साथ सोते ही नहीं थे बल्कि उनके साथ बाथरूम में “नग्न स्नान” भी करते थे।नई किताब यह खुलासा करती है कि गांधी उन युवा महिलाओं के साथ ख़ुद को संतप्त किया जो उनकी पूजा करती थीं और अकसर उनके साथ बिस्तर शेयर करती थीं|

ब्रिटिश हिस्टोरियन के मुताबिक महात्मा गांधी सेक्स के बारे लिखना या बातें करना बेहद पसंद करते थे। किताब के मुताबिक हालांकि अन्य उच्चाकाक्षी पुरुषों की तरह गांधी कामुक भी थे और सेक्स से जुड़े तत्थों के बारे में आमतौर पर खुल कर लिखते थे। अपनी इच्छा को दमित करने के लिए ही उन्होंने कठोर परिश्रम का अनोखा स्वाभाव अपनाया जो कई लोगों कोस्वीकार नहीं हो सकता।

किताब की शुरुआत ही गांधी की उस स्वीकारोक्ति से हुई है जिसमें गांधी ख़ुद लिखा या कहा करते थे कि उनके अंदर सेक्स-ऑब्सेशन का बीजारोपण किशोरावस्था में हुआ और वह बहुत कामुक हो गए थे। 13 साल की उम्रमें 12 साल की कस्तूरबा से विवाह होने के बाद गांधी अकसर बेडरूम में होते थे। यहां तक कि उनके पिता कर्मचंद उर्फ कबा गांधी जब मृत्यु-शैया पर पड़े मौत से जूझ रहे थे उस समय किशोर मोहनदास पत्नी कस्तूरबा के साथ अपने बेडरूम में सेक्स का आनंद ले रहे थे।
किताब में कहा गया है कि विभाजन के दौरान नेहरू गांधी को अप्राकृतिक और असामान्य आदत वाला इंसान मानने लगे थे। सीनियर लीडर जेबी कृपलानी और वल्लभभाई पटेल ने गांधी के कामुक व्यवहार के चलते ही उनसे दूरी बना ली। यहां तक कि उनके परिवार के सदस्य और अन्य राजनीतिक साथी भी इससे ख़फ़ा थे। कई लोगों ने गांधी के प्रयोगों के चलते आश्रम छोड़ दिया।
किताब में पंचगनी में ब्रह्मचर्य का प्रयोग का भी वर्णन किया है, जहां गांधी की सहयोगी सुशीला नायर गांधी के साथ निर्वस्त्र होकर सोती थीं और उनके साथ निर्वस्त्र होकर नहाती भी थीं।

किताब में गांधी के ही वक्तव्य को उद्धरित किया गया है। मसलन इस बारे में गांधी ने ख़ुद लिखा है, “नहाते समय जब सुशीला निर्वस्त्र मेरे सामने होती है तो मेरी आंखें कसकर बंद हो जाती हैं। मुझे कुछ भी नज़र नहीं आता। मुझे बस केवल साबुन लगाने की आहट सुनाई देती है। मुझे कतई पता नहीं चलता कि कब वह पूरी तरह से नग्न हो गई है और कब वह सिर्फ अंतःवस्त्र पहनी होती है।”

किताब के ही मुताबिक जब बंगाल में दंगे हो रहे थे गांधी ने 18 साल की मनु को बुलाया और कहा “अगर तुम साथ नहीं होती तो मुस्लिम चरमपंथी हमारा क़त्ल कर देते। आओ आज से हम दोनों निर्वस्त्र होकर एक दूसरे के साथ सोएं और अपने शुद्ध होने और ब्रह्मचर्य का परीक्षण करें।”

ऐडम का दावा है कि गांधी के साथ सोने वाली सुशीला, मनु और आभा ने गांधी के साथ शारीरिक संबंधों के बारे हमेशा अस्पष्ट बात कही।जब भी पूछा गया तब केवल यही कहा कि वह ब्रह्मचर्य के प्रयोग के सिद्धांतों का अभिन्न अंग है।

हत्या के बाद गांधी को महिमामंडित करने और राष्ट्रपिता बनाने के लिए उनदस्तावेजों, तथ्यों और सबूतों को नष्ट कर दिया, जिनसे साबित किया जा सकता था कि संत गांधी दरअसल सेक्स मैनियैक थे।

कांग्रेस भी स्वार्थों के लिए अब तक गांधी और उनके सेक्स-एक्सपेरिमेंट से जुड़े सच को छुपाती रही है। गांधीजी की हत्या के बाद मनु को मुंह बंद रखने की सलाह दी गई। सुशीला भी इस मसले पर हमेशा चुप ही रहीं।
बंगाली परिवार की विद्वान और ख़ूबसूरत महिला सरलादेवी चौधरी से गांधी का संबंध जगज़ाहिर है।
हालांकि गांधी केवल यही कहते रहे कि सरलादेवी उनकी “आध्यात्मिक पत्नी” हैं।

ऐडम्स ने स्वीकार किया है कि यह किताब विवाद से घिरेगी। उन्होंने कहा, “मैं जानता हूं इस एक किताब को पढ़कर भारत के लोग मुझसे नाराज़ हो सकते हैं लेकिन जब मेरी किताब का लंदन विश्वविद्यालय में विमोचन हुआ तो तमाम भारतीय छात्रों ने मेरे प्रयास की सराहना की, मुझे बधाई दी।” 288 पेज की करीब आठ सौ रुपए मूल्य कीयह किताब जल्द ही भारतीय बाज़ार में उपलब्ध होगी। 'गांधीः नैक्ड ऐंबिशन' का लंदन यूनिवर्सिटी में विमोचन हो चुका है। किताब में गांधी की जीवन की तक़रीबन हर अहम घटना को समाहित करने की कोशिश की गई है। जैड ऐडम्स ने गांधी के महाव्यक्तित्व को महिमामंडित करने की पूरी कोशिश की है। हालांकि उनके सेक्स-जीवन की इस तरह व्याख्या की है कि गांधीवादियों और कांग्रेसियों को इस पर सख़्त ऐतराज़ हो सकता है।
 

Monday, February 1, 2016

That is how Godse saved India.


1.

सैनिक और हत्यारे में क्या अंतर है? हत्यारा व्यक्तिगत कारण से किसी के प्राण लेता है किन्तु सैनिक सदैव राष्ट्र के हित के लिये शत्रु के प्राण लेता है. उसके कारण हम सुरक्षित होते हैं. हत्यारे को व्यवस्था प्राणदंड देती है किन्तु सैनिक को वीर-चक्र, महावीर-चक्र, परमवीर-चक्र देती है. उसकी समाधि पर प्रधानमंत्री सैल्यूट करते हैं. समाज फूल चढ़ाता है. केवल लक्ष्य के अंतर से एक उपेक्षा और दूसरा प्रशंसा पाता है.

देश को नष्ट करने का प्रयास करने वाले को हम शत्रु मान कर व्यवहार करते हैं किन्तु जिसके कारण देश का एक तिहाई भाग ग़ुलाम बन गया, करोड़ों लोग विस्थापित हुए, लाखों लोग मारे गये, हिन्दू समाज पर इतिहास की सबसे बड़ी विपत्ति आयी, जिसके कारण सर्वाधिक हिन्दू नष्ट हुए, जिसने 1948 में देश पर पाकिस्तानी आक्रमण के समय पाकिस्तान को 55 करोड़ रुपये दिलवाने के लिये आमरण-अनशन किया, उसको हम बिना सच जाने सर पर बैठाये हुए हैं.

जी, मैं गांधी जी की बात कर रहा हूँ. उनको दंड देने का कार्य राज्य का था मगर राज्य ने यह कार्य नहीं किया अतः जिस व्यक्ति ने ये आवश्यक कार्य किया वो समाज की उपेक्षा का शिकार है. नथु राम गोडसे की कोई निजी शत्रुता गांधी जी से नहीं थी. वो सुशिक्षित वकील थे, समाचारपत्र के सम्पादक थे.

वो जानते थे गांधी जी को प्राणदंड देते ही मैं नष्ट कर दिया जाऊंगा. मेरा परिवार नष्ट कर दिया जायेगा मगर किसी को भी मातृभूमि के विभाजन का घोर पाप करने का अधिकार नहीं है. ऐसे पापी को दण्डित करने का और कोई उपाय नहीं था अतः मैंने गांधी जी का वध करने का निश्चय किया. मैं गांधी जी पर गोली चलाने के बाद भागा नहीं और तबसे अनासक्त की भांति जीवन जी रहा हूँ. यदि देशभक्ति पाप है तो मैं स्वयं को पापी मानता हूँ और पुण्य तो मैं स्वयं को उस प्रशंसा का अधिकारी मानता हूँ!

हमारे हित के लिये अपने परिवार सहित स्वयं को बलिदान कर देने वाले महापुरुष की छवि उज्जवल हो इतना तो हमें करना ही चाहिये. उस परमवीर महापुरुष नथु राम गोडसे को शत-शत प्रणाम

2.

देश-वासियो!

कोई भी काम अपने लक्ष्य के कारण छोटा/ बड़ा/ महान होता है. हम सब अपनी संपत्ति, परिवार, जीवन की रक्षा करते हैं मगर सम्मान सैनिक को मिलता है चूँकि वो निजी काम की जगह समष्टि की रक्षा करता है.

यहाँ ध्यान रहे, सैनिक का काम उसे जीवन-यापन भी कराता है, अर्थात देश की रक्षा में लगे सैनिक और उसके परिवार का जीवन सैनिक के वेतन पर निर्भर होता है. उसे कठिन जीवन जीना होता है मगर बलिदान हो जाना कोई आवश्यक नहीं होता. तो उस सामान्य मनुष्य को क्या कहेंगे जिसने अपना जीवन राष्ट्र के लिए बलिदान कर दिया.

एक ऐसा व्यक्ति जिसे अपना सम्मान प्राणों से भी प्यारा था, जिसे पता था कि उसके गोली चलाते ही उसका, उसके परिवार का जीवन पूर्णतः नष्ट कर दिया जाये, लोग उस पर थू-थू करेंगे मगर देश और राष्ट्र के हित में उसने अपना बलिदान कर दिया? महान राष्ट्र भक्त नथु राम गोडसे के अतिरिक्त ऐसा पूज्य योद्धा कौन है?

राष्ट्र के इतिहास में अगर किसी एक व्यक्ति का नाम ढूंढा जाये, जिसके कारण लाखों लोग हिन्दू मारे गए, करोड़ों हिंदुओं को अपनी संपत्ति, भूमि, व्यापार छोड़ कर अनजाने क्षितिज की और आना पड़ा, जिसके कारण पवित्र मातृभूमि का बंटवारा हुआ, किसके कारण वेदों के प्रकट होने का स्थान ग़ुलाम हो गया, जिसके कारण भारत का ध्वज स्वर्ण गैरिक भगवा के स्थान पर तिरंगा हुआ, जिसके कारण वंदेमातरम् की जगह चाटुकारिता का गीत जन-मन-गण हम पर लाद दिया गया तो केवल एक मात्र गांधी जी का नाम आयेगा.

जितने भयानक हत्याकांड 300 वर्ष का मुस्लिम शासन भी नहीं कर पाया था, उससे अधिक के निमित्त गांधी जी बने. ऐसे पापी का वध करने वाला योद्धा क्या महापुरुष कहलाने का अधिकारी नहीं है? ये उस महापुरुष की विडम्बना है कि उसने हिन्दू समाज के लिये बलिदान दिया. कहीं वो मुसलमान होते तो मुस्लिम समाज कृतज्ञता से उनके पैर धो धो कर पीता.

Saturday, January 30, 2016

Godse saved India from Gandhi terrorist

पिछले 67 सालों से इस देश में गांधी को 
सबसे बड़ा महात्मा और गोडसे को
सबसे बड़ा आतंकवादी बताया जाता है .......
लेकिन मित्रो क्या आपने कभी सोचा....
कि आखिर क्या थी गोडसे की विवशता ..????
क्या गोडसे नही जानते थे की 
एक आम आदमी को मारने में और एक
राष्ट्रपिता बने को मारने में क्या अंतर है ..?????? और 
क्या गोडसे को अंदाजा नहीं था कि गांधी को 
मारने के बाद क्या होगा उनके परिवार का ..?????
कैसे कैसे कष्ट सहने पड़ेंगे गोडसे के परिवार और 
सम्बन्धियों को और मित्रों को ..????
आखिर क्या था गांधी वध का वास्तविक कारण ..???
क्या थी विभाजन की पीड़ा ..?????
विभाजन के समय क्या क्या हुआ था ..????

आज मीडिया और सेकुलर गिरोह कहता है कि 
"गोडसे आतन्कवादी हैं"... "हत्यारा हैं' ....
परन्तु गोडसे का तो कभी निर्दोष लोगों को 
मारने का पूर्व में कोई रिकॉर्ड नहीं था
न ही गांधी को मारते समय गोडसे ने उनके साथ उपस्थित
लोगों को मारा था .......
तो गोडसे को आतन्कवादी और हत्यारा कैसे कहा
जा सकता हैं .????
.
हत्यारा तो इस गांधी को कहना चाहिए 
क्योंकि जिस गांधी की वजह से लाखों हत्याएँ और 
देश का भयंकर नुकसान हुआ .......
.
यदि गांधी थोड़े दिन और ज़िंदा रह जाता 
तो भारत का नक्शा कुछ ऐसे होना था .....
East पाकिस्तान(आज का बंगलादेश)से पाकिस्तान तक 
चौड़ी सड़क की planning चल रही थी ......
मगर भारत माँ का सीना कटने से बचाया 
भारत माँ के सच्चे सुपुत्र नथु राम गोडसे जी ने 
जिन्होंने गांधी का वध कर देश को बचाया .....
.
उस समय जो हालात थे और गांधी मुस्लिम तुष्टीकरण की खातिर एक के बाद एक भारत को और हिन्दुओं को 
जख्म दिये जा रहा था
यदि गोडसे की जगह कोई भी सच्चा राष्ट्रभक्त होता
तो गांधी को बहुत पहले ही मार देता ......
.
गांधी भक्तों और सेकुलर गिरोह को खुली चुनौती हैं
गांधी वध के बाद हुई अदालती कार्रवाई की बहस और हुतात्मा गोडसे के बयानों व सभी पक्षों को सार्वजनिक करके 
मीडिया में इस पर खुलकर बहस करायी जाए ......
मेरा दावा है दूध का दूध और पानी का पानी हो जाएगा...
परन्तु नहीं ......

गांधी ब्रांड को स्थापित करने वाला वामपंथी गिरोह
कभी सच को बाहर नहीं आने देगा ......
क्योंकि ब्रह्मचर्य प्रयोग के नाम पर कुकर्म करने वाले 
बापू की करतूतों का कच्चा चिट्ठा जब खुलेगा 
तो इस गांधी ब्रांड की धज्जियां उड जायेगी ........ और 
एक बार जब बात निकली तो बहुत दूर तक जायेगी ......
#राष्ट्रहित_में_शेयर_करे...........>>>>>>>>>>

Saturday, October 31, 2015

Indian National Army was reason for British to Quit India not Gandhi

‘The Indian National Army was a greater reason for Indian independence than the Quit India Movement,’ argues the writer. Photo: On the fore, Bose inspecting INA troops in Singapore; Gandhi (inset) presiding over a prayer meeting.
Seven pieces of evidence bear it out.

Writing in his much-acclaimed book Indian Struggle, Subhas Chandra Bose stated, “Mahatma Gandhi has rendered and will continue to render phenomenal service to his country.” “But”, he added, “India’s salvation will not be achieved under his leadership.”
Nearly 70 years after power was transferred to Indian hands, sufficient information has come on record to give a new thrust to the old question: “Who brought India freedom — Gandhi or Bose?”
Of course, in attempting to answer this mother of all vexed queries, I am not committing the sacrilege of postulating that either of the two did not play a pivotal role in the struggle for freedom. It’s just an attempt to rank the No 1 — “the man of the match” in cricket parlance.
Well, I am sticking my neck out and batting for Subhas Chandra Bose. Not because some right wing historian has enlightened me, but because I see some relevant pieces of information which became known several years after Independence. Taking a look at them has shaped my thinking to arrive at this conclusion. If you disagree and have data negating the cumulating effect of following citations, please do offer your point of view. But make sure you stay away from argumentum ad hominem or simply reiterating your beliefs. Let the facts speak for themselves.
The people who were best positioned to answer the question were those who had an inside knowledge of the situation as it prevailed in India from 1942 to 1947. In 1942, Gandhi launched the Quit India movement. The view from the Bose’s side was that it was his suggestion in 1939 to serve a 6-month’s ultimatum on the British Government, which was accepted by Gandhi in totality in his Quit India resolution of August 1942. Prior to this, Gandhi was, as Bose himself stated repeatedly, most reluctant to launch a movement. This is what he wrote in Indian Struggle.
“On 6 September(1939), Mahatma Gandhi, after meeting the Viceroy, Lord Linlithgow, issued a press statement saying that in spite of the differences between India and Britain on the question of Indian independence, India should cooperate with Britain in her hour of danger. This statement came as a bombshell to the Indian people, who since 1927 had been taught by the Congress leaders to regard the next war as a unique opportunity for winning freedom.”
Be that as it may, the Quit India movement was launched in good earnest. Bose praised Gandhi’s stirring speech as he launched it. But, unfortunately, the movement was “crushed within 3 weeks”. Thus spake Khushwant Singh, someone who was not a fan of Subhas Bose. Anyhow, having lived through those times, Singh further explained: “The British were not evicted from India; they found it increasingly difficult to rule it and decided to call it a day.”
So what happened between 1942 and 1947 that made the British take the call? Conventional wisdom can be explained by way of 1954 Bollywood hit “दे दी हमें आज़ादी बिना खडग बिना ढाल/साबरमती के संत तू ने कर दिया कमाल”, which extols Gandhi for having singlehandedly delivered freedom to India solely through the non-violent means. Celebrated historians and researchers with all their experience and exposure (which doesn’t come easily to those who go against the current) can put it better. Prime Minister Narendra Modi seems to back it every now and then.
But how does one gloss over the other side of the story as it comes from records and statements crediting Bose with creating a situation that made the British take the decision?
There is a ground rule in journalism — and also in intelligence — that if 3 informed reliable sources independent of each other make similar statements, the sum of their statements has to as close to truth as one gets it.
So let’s try and connect some dots and see what story they tell.
  1. As late as 1946, Gandhi stated, “We shall be able to win freedom only through the principles the Congress has adopted for the past 30 years.” Gandhi’s own three pet principles were “truth, ahimsa and brahmacharya”. The first 2 are well-espoused by Gandhians, who rather not speak about the third for it is a blot on the Gandhian legacy.
  2. No one knew India’s internal situation better than the Director, Intelligence Bureau. One who thinks it’s the editor of some newspaper is superficial. Here’s what Sir Norman Smith, DIB, noted in a secret report of November 1945 that was declassified in the 1970s: “The situation in respect of the Indian National Army is one which warrants disquiet. There has seldom been a matter which has attracted so much Indian public interest and, it is safe to say, sympathy… the threat to the security of the Indian Army is one which it would be unwise to ignore.”
  3. An agreement of sort came from Lt General SK Sinha, former Governor of Jammu & Kashmir and Assam, who was one of the only 3 Indian officers posted in the Directorate of Military Operations in New Delhi in 1946. “There was considerable sympathy for the INA within the Army… It is true that fears of another 1857 had begun to haunt the British in 1946.” Sinha wrote this in 1976.
  4. Agreeing with this contention were a number of British MPs who met British Prime Minister Clement Attlee in February 1946. “There are two alternative ways of meeting this common desire (a) that we should arrange to get out, (b) that we should wait to be driven out. In regard to (b), the loyalty of the Indian Army is open to question; the INA have become national heroes….” This minute too was declassified in the 1970s.
  5. A most valuable light on the role of the INA was thrown by Bhimrao Ambedkar in February 1956, a few months before he passed away, in a tell-all interview to the BBC. “I don’t know how Mr Attlee suddenly agreed to give India independence… It seems to me from my own analysis that two things led the Labour party to take this decision: 1. The national army that was raised by Subhas Chandra Bose. The British had been ruling the country in the firm belief that whatever may happen in the country or whatever the politicians do, they will never be able to change the loyalty of soldiers. That was one prop on which they were carrying on the administration. And that was completely dashed to pieces.”
  6. The clincher of an argument came from Earl Attlee himself as he visited India in October 1956. Some 2 decades later, PB Chakravarty, Chief Justice of Calcutta High Court and acting Governor of West Bengal in 1956, recalled his talks with the former British PM in the following words: “Toward the end of our discussion I asked Attlee what was the extent of Gandhi’s influence upon the British decision to quit India. Hearing this question, Attlee’s lips became twisted in a sarcastic smile as he slowly chewed out the word, ‘m-i-n-i-m-a-l!”
  7. British historian Michael Edwardes fairly summed this up in his 1964 book, The Last Years of British India. “It slowly dawned upon the Government of India that the backbone of the British rule, the Indian Army, might now no longer be trustworthy. The ghost of Subhas Bose, like Hamlet’s father, walked the battlements of the Red Fort (where the INA soldiers were being tried), and his suddenly amplified figure overawed the conference that was to lead to Independence.”
These are a few of the many factoids that I’d like you to factor in to make your own assessment. As for me, I have been haunted by a lament of Bose which appears in a letter of his dated 21 November 1940. “In the past, it is we who have toiled and suffered and others have reaped the harvest. But how long will this go on?”
As Jawaharlal Nehru delivered his famous “Tryst with destiny” speech, not a word in it was devoted to Bose or his INA, but for whom the transfer of power wouldn’t have taken place in 1947.
Anuj Dhar is the author of bestseller India’s biggest cover-up(नेताजी रहस्य गाथा in Hindi).
from harshad30.wordpress.com

Thursday, October 1, 2015

M K Gandhi -A decoded past,ally of British in WW1.

ShankhNaad's photo.
Hard to believe, but true. Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi gave his wholehearted support to the British Raj during the First World War. He even led a massive recruitment drive encouraging towns and villages to send more men to war.
Around 622,000 soldiers, and 470,000 non-combatants, were sent overseas from India, and around one and a half million were recruited during the war years. But not everyone signed up willingly. There were instances where local leaders ‘stopped the water ...of those who were not readily coming forward to join the army and rewarded people who were joining.’ Brutal methods such as ‘stripping people naked and making them stand before their women folk,’ were also used. People were kept in thorny bushes for hours and hours, and unless they said - yes, I’m ready for enlistment, they were not let out.
Those whole agreed voluntarily, were those actually believed they were fighting UK in the World War, which was 1 in 4 Indians !
He was awarded the Kaisar-i-Hind in 1915 by The Lord Hardinge of Penshurst for his support and service to the British Raj.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/…/articlesh…/44124189.cms
http://www.dnaindia.com/…/column-world-war-1-india-s-forgot

Saturday, February 7, 2015

Mahatma Gandhi wanted to marry Ravindranath Tagore's neice at 50 yrs of age

५० साल की उम्र में गांधीजी रवींद्रनाथ टागोर की भांजी से करना चाहते थे दूसरी शादी !

अनेकों पुस्तकों में महात्मा गांधी से कई स्त्रियों के संबधों का दावा किया गया है। लेकिन इसमें सबसे चर्चास्पद मामला रहा है, महात्मा गांधी और सरला देवी के संबंधों को लेकर। महात्मा गांधी और सरलादेवी शादी करना चाहते थे। उल्लेखनीय है सरलादेवी रवींद्रनाथ टैगोर की बड़ी बहन की बेटी थीं।

स समय ५० वर्षीय बापू चार संतानों के पिता बन चुके थे…

इतिहास की अनेकों पुस्तकों में महात्मा गांधी से कई स्त्रियों के संबधों का दावा किया गया है। लेकिन इसमें सबसे चर्चास्पद मामला रहा है, महात्मा गांधी और सरला देवी के संबंधों को लेकर। उल्लेखनीय है कि सरलादेवी रवींद्रनाथ टैगोर की बड़ी बहन की बेटी थीं।
कस्तूरबा
सरलादेवी
सुशीला नायर
गांधीजी के ७१ वर्षीय पोते राजमोहन गांधी ने अपनी एक पुस्तक में लिखा है कि अपनी विवेकबुद्धि के लिए प्रख्यात महात्मा गांधी विवाहित और चार संतानों के पिता होने के बावजूद भी सरलादेवी के प्रेम में पड़ गए थे। इतना ही नहीं, वे सरला से शादी करने के लिए भी तैयार हो गए थे। सरलादेवी गांधीजी की पत्नी कस्तूरबा की तुलना में काफी प्रतिभाशाली और बुद्धिमान थीं और वे स्वतंत्रता संग्राम में सक्रिय थीं।
परिवार और राष्ट्रहित के लिए उन पर भी गांधीजी से संबंधों पर पूर्ण विराम लगाने का दबाव डाला गया। राजमोहन के अनुसार गांधीजी का यह प्रेम प्रकरण सीक्रेट नहीं था, बल्कि यह बात दोनों परिवारों में सबको मालूम थी।
सरलादेवी के पति चौधरी राम भाजी दत्त स्वतंत्रता संग्राम में मुख्य रूप से सक्रिय थे। जब वे जेल में थे, तब उन्होंने ही सरलादेवी को महात्मा गांधी के घर पर रहने के लिए कहा था। बताया जाता है कि इसी बीच महात्मा गांधी और सरलादेवी एक-दूसरे के नजदीक आए थे। इन्होंने तो ‘आध्यात्मिक लग्न’ कर लेने का आयोजन भी कर लिया था, जिसका गांधीजी के बेटे देवदास गांधी ने भारी विरोध किया था।
सरलादेवी के अलावा गांधीजी के कुछ अन्य स्त्रियों से संबंधों का भी दावा किया जाता है। इसमें ब्रिटिश एडमिरल की बेटी मेडेलीन स्लेड, सुशीला नायर और दो मानसपुत्रियों मनु तथा आभा गांधी का भी नाम शामिल है।
महात्मा गांधी ने अपनी आत्मकथा ‘मेरे सत्य के प्रयोग’ में लिखा है कि जब उनके पिता मरणासन्न की स्थिति में थे, तब वे कस्तूरबा से शारीरिक संबंध स्थापित कर रहे थे, इसी बीच दूसरे कमरे में उनके पिता की मृत्यु हुई थी। इस घटना के बाद से सेक्स के प्रति महात्मा गांधी की रुचि कम हो गई और वे मानने लगे कि जब दंपति को संतान उत्पन्न करना हो, तभी शारीरिक संबंध स्थापित करने चाहिए।

इतना ही नहीं, महात्मा गांधी अपने ब्रह्मचर्य की परीक्षा लेने के लिए सुशीला नायर और टीनएज मनु तथा आभा के साथ सह-स्नान और नग्न होकर सोने के प्रयोग भी किया करते थे। महात्मा गांधी के ये प्रयोग भारी विवाद का मुद्दा भी बना था। इसे लेकर आश्रमवासियों और उनके परिवारजनों ने उनसे नाराजगी भी प्रकट की थी।
मनु तथा आभा
source-

Dainik bhaskar

Sunday, January 11, 2015

M K(C)GANDHI WAS KILLED BECAUSE HE WANTED SHARIA LAW IN INDIA

मुसलमान गांधीजी को बहुत बहुत पसंद करते हैं...क्यों..?
1. "अगर मुसलमान लोग हम हिन्दुओं को मारना चाहें...तो हमें मौत को वीरता से गले लगाना चाहिए..." ... यानि हिन्दुओं को अश्त्र नहीं उठाना चाहिए...अपनी रक्षा के लिए कुछ नहीं करना चाहिए...चुप चाप मर जाना चाहिए...अब पता लगा नेहरु ने गांधीजी को क्यों राष्ट्र पिता घोषित किया....ताकि hindu पिताजी की बात मान कर चुप चाप मरता रहे...और भारत एक दिन मुस्लिम देश बन जाये....!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
2. मुसलामन लाख हिन्दुओं को बर्बाद करना चाहे...फिर भी हिन्दुओं को उनके लिए अपने दिलों में गुस्सा नहीं पालना चाहिए....
3. अगर मुसलमान लोग हम हिन्दुओं को मारने के बाद अपना शाशन कायम करें तो हम अपना अपना जीवन बलिदान देने के बाद एक नयी दुनिया में जायेंगे..
�My principal object in coming to Hindustan� has been to accomplish two things. The first was to war with the infidels, the enemies of the Mohammadan religion; and by this religious warfare to acquire some claim to reward in the life to come. The other was� that the army of Islam might gain something by plundering the wealth and valuables of the infidels: plunder in war is as lawful as their mothers� milk to Musalmans who war for their faith.�
Amir Timur
While studying the legacy of Muslim rule in India, it has to be constantly borne in mind that the objectives of all Muslim invaders and rulers were the same as those mentioned above. Timur or Tamerlane himself defines them candidly and bluntly while others do so through their chroniclers.
Read more -http://voiceofdharma.org/books/tlmr/ch3.htm

..http://www.danielpipes.org/

Tuesday, November 18, 2014

नथूराम ने कहा, ह्त्या के समय गांधी के मुख से “आह” की आवाज निकली, “हे राम” शब्द नहीं

























नथूराम गोडसे की पुण्य तिथी पर..,
नथूराम गोडसे, एक राष्ट्रवादी योद्धा, जिसने अपने प्राणों की आहुती से ..., गांधी को , देश के साथ खिलवाड़ से.., देश के टुकड़े करने के बाद भी, देश की तुष्टी करण की नीती से, देश को असहाय बनाने के बाद, आगे के खेल से, देश को पंगु बनाने का, अंजाम न दे सके , इस ह्त्या का उद्देश्य बताया,
याद रहे, नथूराम गोड़से ने स्वंय अपना मुकदमा लड़ते हुए , गांधी की ह्त्या करने के १५० कारण गिनाये थे...,तब अदालत में बैठे दर्शकों की आँखे, आंसू लबालब भरकर, जमीन में गिरकर नाथूराम गोड़से को सलाम कर रही थी ...
१. गांधी ह्त्या के पहिले नथूराम गोडसे ने गांधी को प्रणाम किया, बाद में गोली मारी.
२. नथूराम ने अदालत में कहा , मैंने गांधी को गोली मारने में इतनी सावधानी से, इतने, पास से गोली मारी ताकि उनके बगल में दो युवतियां, जो हमेशा उनके साथ रहती थी.., उन्हें गोली के छर्रे लगने से, मैं बदनाम न हो जाऊं (याद रहे, गांधी उन युवतियों के साथ नग्न सोकर, ब्रह्मचर्य /सत्य के प्रयोग में इस्तेमाल करते थे)
३. नथूराम ने कहा, ह्त्या के समय गांधी के मुख से “आह” की आवाज निकली, “हे राम” शब्द नहीं ..., 
जिसे कांग्रेस ने हेराल्ड अखबार के प्रचार से “हे राम” शब्द से देशवासियों को भरमाया..
न्यायाधीश खोसला ने, अपने सेवा निर्वत्ती के बाद कहा था , यदि मुझे न्याय के लिए स्वतंत्र विचार दिया जाता तो मैं, नथूराम गोड़से को निर्दोषी मानता , मैं तो कानून का गुलाम था, इसलिए मुझे नाथूराम गोड़से व उसके अन्य साथियों को मृत्यु दंड सुनाना पड़ा
नथूराम गोड़से व उनके साथी, ‘भारतमाता की गोद में’ सोने के लिए इतने आतुर थे कि उन्होंने उच्च न्यायालय में अपनी सजा को चुनौती नहीं दी और न ही क्षमा याचना की अपील राष्ट्रपति से की ...
यह शांती का दूत..????, कपूत निकला.., याद रहे, इस अनशन की खाल में बापू ने .., दो विश्व युध्ह में २ लाख हिंदुस्थानी सैनिकों की अकारण बलि देकर, जो कुत्ते की मौत मारे गए थे .. व १९४७ में देश का अंग भंग कर ५ लाख हिन्दुस्थानियो की बलि लेकर..., इस अहिसा के परदे में खूनी खेल खेलकर, आज तक शांती दूत का चेहरा दिखाया है...
गाँधी वध के पश्चात जब सावरकर जी को न्यायलय ने सम्मान बरी किया तो जज का, वीर सावरकर के लिए यह
वक्तव्य था ..., “सावरकर ने अपना जीवन राष्ट्र के लिए समर्पित कर दिया, लेकिन ऐसे तुच्छ कार्य में उन्हें घसीटना बहुत ही निंदनीय है, इस बात की जांच की जानी चाहिए की ऐसे महान व्यक्ति का नाम इस कार्य में क्यों घसीटा गया”
जबकि स्वयं नथूराम गोडसे ने गाँधी वध में सावरकरजी की संलिप्तता को सिरे से नकार दिया,
धर्मनिरपेक्षता के झूठे आडम्बर में फंसे तथाकथित सेकुलर उस दिन सूर्य के सामान जुगनू से प्रतीत हो रहे थे, जो की सूर्य को अपनी मद्दम रौशनी दिखा कर उसे निचा दिखाने की कोशिश कर रहे है,
वीर सावरकर के क्रातिकारी के जज्बे को सलाम करने के के लिए, 13 मार्च 1910 मे जहाज से कूदकर,पानी मे अंग्रज सैनिको की पीछे से गोली गोलियो की बौछर का सामना करते हुए , फ्रांस के मार्सेल तट पर पहुँचे, इस साहसिक घटना को जीवित कर , प्रेरित करने के लिए, घटना की 100 वर्ष पूरे होने के उपलक्ष्य मे एक भव्य स्मारक बनाने के लिए भारत सरकार को सूचित किया , और भारत सरकार ने वीर सावरकर को देश्द्रोही कहकर आपत्ति उठाने से वह प्रकल्प बंद करवा दिया..
दोस्तों अब गांधी जयंती के आयोजन में झूठे दिखावे के आचरण से, देश को, सरकारी अवकाश व विज्ञापनों व अन्य खर्चों से १० हजार करोड़ का चूना लगाने वाला है...
गांधी की गंदी राजनीती व जवाहर लाल नेहरू के जहर से देश ६८ साल के सत्ता परिवर्तन के शासन में कंगाल हो गया है..., आज सभी पार्टीयाँ विदेशों में विदेशी हाथ माँगने जा रहें हैं...
सत्ता तो मद से भरी.., मदारियों का समूह १९४७ से सत्ता परिवर्तन को आजादी के झांसे से बन्दर बांट से देश को लूट रहा है...
राजधर्म तो जातिवाद, भाषावाद,अलगाववाद, धर्मवाद व घुसपैठीयों से राजनीती में गहरी पैठ से जनता को गरीबी से तडफा-तड़फा कर..., हलाल कर ..., आज अपने को देश का लाल बनाकर., २ अक्टूबर से १४ नवम्बर से सालों - साल तक इनके पुतले..,बिना नहलाए पूजे जा रहें है...और तो और ६८ सालों से देश में गरीबी की वजह से गांधी का चष्मा चुरा लिया जाता है..., २ अक्टूबर तक सत्ताखोर बदहवासी में रहता है...

Friday, June 13, 2014

SHAMEFULL RASHTRAPITA "GANDHI"

When Hindu refugees in Delhi occupied mosques, some Muslim leaders approached Gandhi to seek help in evicting the Hindus. This made him begin a fast and the situation was resolved in the favor of the Muslims. However, when Hindus living in Pakistan suffered violent attacks at the hands of the Muslims, Gandhi did not utter a single word in protest or try to censure the Pakistani government or the concerned Muslims, by way of a fast. This is because Gandhi was well aware that, ...if he went on a fast under the above circumstances, impose some condition for his breaking the same, he would eventually die in the process and no Muslim would ever shed any tears. This was exactly why he deliberately shied away from imposing any conditions on the Muslims. He had learned from experience that, Jinnah would neither be perturbed nor influenced by his fast and his Muslim League would scarcely attach any importance to the same.
Gandhi with his immense popularity among Muslims and the reverence he received from Hindus, could have been an effective mediator between them. Instead, he chose the easy way out. Events indicate that he was quite unmoved by the tribulations of the Hindus, while ready to shed tears for Muslims. May be that was why Khlifa Haji Mehmud of Lurwani, Sind, a devout Muslim once accorded Gandhi the ultimate accolade that any Muslim can give a person, in these words: “Gandhi

was really a Mohammedan” (D Keer, 1980).

Friday, May 2, 2014

Why Godse Killed Gandhi???

GANDHI WAS SHOT TO SAVE HINDU AGAINST HUMILIATION-

The acts of anti HIndu called " MAHATMA" , whose execution was explained by NV Godse
"Brothers! Our mother land has been cut into pieces. The eagles have torn her skin into bits.
Hindu women are being raped in the middle of the road. How long can we tolerate this? It’s a shame that lakhs of Hindus live like refugees in their own country. Women being raped burn my heart.
...
Gandhi started his fast; the Hindus put their weapons down. I still remember that day.
A poor Hindu told Gandhi, ‘I am putting down my weapons because I don’t want your death on my conscience but I am staying alone with my family in the Muslim area.
That night, before leaving Hyderabad I visited his home. The whole household was screaming, weeping, his only eight-year-old son had been killed by the Muslims. He had no weapon to defend himself.
He threw his son’s body on my lap and said, “Take his blood to your Mahatma. Tell him, if he goes on fast again, he can finish it by drinking not orange-juice but my son’s blood.”
I could not say anything. Gandhi was the Father of my Nation. For a moment, I was tempted to pull out the Muslims from their homes and chop them down.
But I controlled myself. Violence for self-defense is justified; otherwise it is an ill-cultured act. I returned to where Gandhi was staying but he had already left by car.
Of course, there would have been no point in meeting him… he would only have prayed for both the killer and the victim." - Nathuram Godse.
(<<Our mother land has been cut into pieces>>
It was not a systematic well supervised, clean partition separating Muslims and Hindus in a clean, orderly way, sans mob violence.)
http://www.imrajeev.com/why-godse-killed-gandhi/ -Details is here-


Sixty one years after the assassination of Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, a ‘mahatma’ to many but really a cunning politician who had mastered the art of manipulating the Indian National Congress and offering simplistic solutions to the most complex problems, apart from coercing others to toe his line by abandoning food, the story of his murder continues to elicit both curiosity and passion. He was not the first leader to be felled by an assassin’s bullet, nor is he the only eminent Indian, or South Asian for that matter, to fall victim to an elaborate murder conspiracy.
But Gandhi’s assassination was different. Not only his killers were Hindu, they killed a man who had by then come to be regarded at home and abroad as an “apostle of peace” and symbolized the unique doctrine of ‘non-violence’. In those early days of freedom, it was unthinkable that anybody would dare raise a finger, leave alone a gun, at Gandhi. Yet Nathuram Vinayak Godse did the unthinkable, with more than a little help from Narayan Apte, Vishnu Karkare, Gopal Godse, Madanlal Pahwa and Digambar Badge. Godse assassinated Gandhi on January 30, 1948, approaching him during the evening prayer, bowing, and shooting him three times at close range with a Beretta semi-automatic pistol. Immediately after this, he surrendered himself to police. Nathuram Godse, Apte and their accomplices look remarkably relaxed during the trial, unconcerned about the possibility of being sentenced to death – eventually Godse and Apte were hanged; Karkare, Gopal Godse, Pahwa were sentenced to life imprisonment. They never regretted their deed.
Those were terrible days. Hindu and Sikh refugees from Pakistan were struggling to keep body and soul together. Many of them had lost their loved ones in the partition riots — women were raped in front of their husbands and children; young girls were abducted; men were disemboweled; trains arrived laden with dead bodies; people fleeing marauders were set upon with ferocious brutality. Madanlal Pahwa, a young refugee, Malgonkar writes, “reached a place called Fazilka, in Indian Territory, and discovered that another refugee column in which his father and other relatives had set out, had fared much worse. They had been attacked by Jihadi mobs: ‘Only 40 or 50 had survived out of 400 or 500…’.” Delhi was flooded by nearly one million refugees, all of them desperately looking for food and shelter. They were distraught and traumatized, unable to figure out why their lives had been turned upside down in so gruesome a manner. Nor could they understand the rationale behind protecting Delhi’s Muslims. What left them aghast was Gandhi’s insistence that Hindu and Sikh refugees should be sent back to Pakistan and Muslims who had left India be brought back. It didn’t make sense. Nor did the vicious blood-letting that followed. Meanwhile, Pakistan had launched its mission to smash and grab Jammu & Kashmir and was demanding that India hand over Rs 55 crore, its share of the cash reserve inherited from the departing British colonial Government.
After independence Gandhi used to start Satyagraha on every issue which went directly against the interest of India. Gandhi started hunger strike against sending of troops to Kashmir after Pakistani invasion. He was in favour of ahinsha Satyagraha against Pakistani invaders. In west Punjab, lakhs of Sikhs were killed and their body dispatched by train. In reaction to this, Sikhs started to retaliate here. Gandhi started hunger strike again to prevent it.
The proverbial last straw was Gandhi’s threat to go on a fast to force the Government of India to accept Pakistan’s demand of Rs 55 Crore. In all fairness, it needs to be recalled that Jawaharlal Nehru was opposed to the idea: He famously declared that giving the money to Pakistan would mean providing it with “sinews of war”. The old man was not listening: In the end, Gandhi had his way although people were aghast. But did this gross act of injustice to the people of India and the callous disregard for the sentiments of millions of refugees — half-a-million people perished in the violence, 12 million were rendered homeless — justify Nathuram Godse’s action? What inspired Narayan Apte, son of a well-known historian and Sanskrit scholar, to decide on January 13 (the day Gandhi declared he would go on a fast to press Pakistan’s demand for Rs 55 crore) that he must turn into a killer? What was Madanlal Pahwa’s role in the conspiracy? And why did Badge turn approver?
Godse is often a misunderstood character. He is referred to as a Hindu fanatic. It is often hard to understand Godse because the Government of India had suppressed information about him. His court statements, letters etc. were all banned from the public until recently. Judging from his writings one thing becomes very clear – He was no fanatic. His court statements are very well read out and indicate a calm and collected mental disposition. He never even once speaks ill about Gandhi as a person, but only attacks Gandhi’s policies which caused ruin and untold misery to Hindus. Another interesting point to note is that Godse had been working with the Hindu refugees fleeing from Pakistan. He had seen the horrible atrocities committed on them. Many women had their hands cut off; nose cut off, even little girls had been raped mercilessly. Despite this Godse did not harm even single Muslim in India which he could easily have. So it would be a grave mistake to call him a Hindu fanatic.
Then what was the motive behind Godse’s act??? Nathuram Godse was a learned man, very sharp and intelligent – editor of “Agrani” (one of the most famous newspaper of that time – with Nana Aapte). In his last editorial of “Agrani” which he changed overnight – he said “Gandhi must be stopped – at any cost” and he justified why Gandhiji’s assassination was not only inevitable but also a delayed action and that should’ve happened LONG AGO.
He knew exactly what he is going to do. In Nathuram’s Words – “Assassination is never as easy as picking up a rifle and pulling the trigger, assassination is never an accident. Yes, murder could be an accident but not assassination. In this case of Gandhi, it could never be…”
Did he tamper with an important era of history?? He said – “I differ with the word era. It could be a page, a leaf of history. Certainly not an era. If we don’t turn this page today, the rest of the pages of the history of our nation will remain unwritten, blank…”
By seeing the nature of the assassination in public space and Godse’s act of turning himself over to the Police, we can see that Godse did not do this for personal reasons. He very well knew that he would be hanged and his name would be disgraced as Gandhi was considered a saint. And again Godse could have ran away and escaped punishment. But he did the reverse. He called a police officer and courted arrest. Before we proceed it would be wise to understand the backdrop of the assassination.
The central government had taken a decision — Pakistan will not be given Rs 55 Crores. On January 13 Gandhi started a fast unto death that Pakistan must be given the money. On January 13, the central government changed its earlier decision and announced that Pakistan would be given the amount. On January 13, Nathuram decided to assassinate Gandhi.
Also according to one source, after the state of Pakistan was formed administrative problems started to crop up. Therefore Pakistan came up with a proposal to link East Pakistan (the present day Bangladesh) and West Pakistan. According to the plan a road (you could say an area) 10 km wide would be linking the east division with the west. Now the RSS activists feared that if Pakistan requested Gandhi to sanction such a proposal then Gandhi would readily agree and the Mahatma’s would be the final word as he was the father of the nation. They knew that Gandhi was Pakistan’s best lobby so they had him eliminated through Godse. I wonder what would have happened if we had allowed a road to be built across our country. I just can’t imagine.
In the Hindu Rashtra daily dated 9/7/1947, Godse had given the following message to the fellow Indians. “Brothers! Our mother land has been cut into pieces. The eagles have torn her skin into bits. Hindu women are being raped in the middle of the road. How long can we tolerate this? It’s a shame that lakhs of Hindus live like refugees in their own country. Women being raped burn my heart.”
He warned Gandhiji “Gandhiji! By approving the Pakistan partition, you have stabbed the nation. Unless you change your activities, you must face harsh consequences. We consider the dividers of our nation as traitors our nation.”
In Nathuram’s words – “I don’t refute Gandhi’s theory of non-violence. He may be a saint but he is not a politician. His theory of non-violence denies self-defence and self-interest. The non-violence that defines the fight for survival as violence is a theory not of non-violence but of self-destruction. The division of the nation was an unnecessary decision. What was the percentage of the Muslim population as compared to the population of the nation? There was no need for a separate nation. Had it been a just demand, Maulana Azad would not have stayed back in India. But because Jinnah insisted and because Gandhi took his side, India was divided, in spite of opposition from the nation, the Cabinet. An individual is never greater than a nation. But Gandhi has stared considering himself greater than the nation.
We never opposed a Muslim prime minister. In a democracy you cannot put forward your demands at knife-point. Jinnah did it and Gandhi stabbed the nation with the same knife. He dissected the land and gave a piece to Pakistan. We did picket that time but in vain. The Father of our Nation went to perform his paternal duties for Pakistan! Gandhi blackmailed the cabinet with his fast unto death. His body, his threats to die are causing the destruction — geographical as well as economical — of the nation. Today, Muslims have taken a part of the nation, tomorrow Sikhs may ask for Punjab. The religions are again dividend into castes; they will demand sub-divisions of the divisions. What remains of the concept of one nation, national integration? Why did we fight the British in unison for independence? Why not separately? Bhagat Singh did not ask only for an independent Punjab or Subhash Chandra Bose for an independent Bengal?
At the time of Partition, when Suharawady surrendered only due to political pressure, but only Suharawady, not his followers…they went on with the massacre. Gandhi started his fast; the Hindus put their weapons down. I still remember that day. A poor Hindu told Gandhi, ‘I am putting down my weapons because I don’t want your death on my conscience but I am staying alone with my family in the Muslim area. That night, before leaving Hyderabad I visited his home. The whole household was screaming, weeping, his only eight-year-old son had been killed by the Muslims. He had no weapon to defend himself. He threw his son’s body on my lap and said, “Take his blood to your Mahatma. Tell him, if he goes on fast again, he can finish it by drinking not orange-juice but my son’s blood.” I could not say anything. Gandhi was the Father of my Nation. For a moment, I was tempted to pull out the Muslims from their homes and chop them down. But I controlled myself. Violence for self-defence is justified; otherwise it is an ill-cultured act. I returned to where Gandhi was staying but he had already left by car. Of course, there would have been no point in meeting him… he would only have prayed for both the killer and the victim.
I am going to assassinate him in the open, before the public, because I am going to do it as my duty. If I do it surreptitiously, it becomes a crime in my own eyes. I will not try to escape, I will surrender and naturally I will be hanged. One assassination, one hanging. I don’t want two executions for one assassination and I don’t want your involvement, participation or company. (This was for Nana-Apte and Veer Savarkar as they were against Gandhi’s policies too; Godse wanted to assassinate Gandhi all by himself and took promise from Nana Apte that he will continue helping Veer Savarkar in rebuilding India as a strong free nation.)
On January 30, I reached Birla Bhavan at 12 pm. Gandhi was sitting outside on a cot enjoying the sunshine. Vallabhbhai Patel’s granddaughter was sitting at his feet. I had the revolver with me. I could have assassinated him easily then, but I was convinced that his assassination was to be a punishment and a sentence against him, and I would execute him. I wanted witnesses for the execution but there were none. I did not want to escape after the execution as there was not an iota of guilt in my mind. I wanted to surrender, but surrender to whom? There was a good crowd to collect for the evening prayers. I decided on the evening of January 30 as the date for Gandhi’s execution.
It was 4.45 pm when I reached the gate of Birla Bhavan. The security staff at the gate was scrutinising the crowd entering and I was a little worried about them. I mingled with a small group of people and sneaked inside. It was 5.10 pm when I saw Gandhi and his close associates coming to the prayer place from his room inside. I approached the passage from where he was likely to climb the steps of the lawn, in such a way that I was covered by a few people.
Gandhi climbed the steps and came forward. He had kept his hands on the shoulders of the two girls. I wanted just three seconds more. I moved two steps forward and faced Gandhi. Now I wanted to take out the revolver and salute him for whatever sacrifice and service he had made for the nation. One of the two girls was dangerously close to Gandhi and I was afraid that she might be injured in the course of firing. As a precautionary measure I went one more step ahead, bowed before him and gently pushed the girl away from the firing line. The next moment I fired at Gandhi. Gandhi was very weak, there was a feeble sound like ‘aah’ (There are proof that Gandhi did NOT say “Hey Ram” at that time – it’s just made up stuff) from him and he fell down.
Those who were close to me saw the weapon in my hand. They rushed away from the spot. Gandhi had fallen to the ground, I was standing and the crowd had formed a ring around us.
After the firing I raised my hand holding the revolver and shouted, ‘Police, police’. For 30 seconds nobody came forward and I scanned the crowd. I saw a police officer. I signalled to him to come forward and arrest me. He came and caught my wrist, and then a second man came and touched the revolver… I let it go…”
Trial and execution
Following his assassination of Gandhi, he was put on trial beginning May 27, 1948. During the trial, he did not defend any charge and openly admitted that he killed Gandhi. On November 8, 1949 Godse was sentenced to death for the murder. Godse’s legal team was savaged by critics for not introducing considerable evidence that their client was mentally unbalanced and/or manipulated by others. Among those calling for commutation of the death sentence for both defendants were Nehru and Gandhi’s two sons who felt that the two men on trial were pawns of RSS higher-ups and, in any case, executing their fathers’ killers would dishonour his memory and legacy which included a staunch opposition to the death penalty. Godse was hanged at Ambala Jail on November 15, 1949, along with Narayan Apte, the other conspirator. Savarkar was also charged with conspiracy in the assassination of Gandhi, but was acquitted and subsequently released. Godse stipulated that his ashes were not to be deposited in a body of water according to Hindu dictates, but rather were to be held in storage until they could be deposited in The Sindhu after Pakistan had been reunited with India. For years, his brother kept Godse’s ashes over his fireplace and held an annual salute to “the hero martyrs” on the anniversary of the assassination.
Yes! I Killed Mohandas Gandhi and I am Glad I Did It!
That is what Gopal Godse says. Gopal Godse spent 18 years in prison for his role in the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi. His brother and one other conspirator were hanged by the neck until dead.
But it was all worth it, says Gopal Godse. Gopal Godse proudly recounts his role in plotting the assassination of Mohandas K. Gandhi in 1948.
Thank from Rajiv Ranjan Ji.
Photo: Farooq Abdulah asked those who vote for Mr Modi to jump in the sea? See Exhibition on the exodus of #KashmirHindus
------------------------
http://refugees-in-their-own-country.blogspot.in/
---------------------
What is this Kashmiriyat?

What does it stand for? When was the term Kashmiriyat coined? Who coined it and for what? The Left-oriented and essentially pro-Congress and ragtag UPA news channel, NDTV India, on November 1 organised a debate on Article 370 under its programme, Badi Khabar between 6 and 7 pm. The anchor was the sophisticated, Nidhi Kulpati. One of the five participants, journalist Om Thanvi, like the anchor, was absolutely ignorant about Article 370. They were neither here nor there. Two of them – Union Minister Harish Rawat and MP Mehboob Beg of National Conference – exhibited their hatred for the Indian laws and used the opportunity to distort facts, murder history, preach falsehood and speak half-truths to mislead the nation.

Both behaved in the most irresponsible manner and proved that they represented that view that had culminated in the communal partition of India in August 1947. The remaining two panelists – BJP’s Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi and RSS’s Baldev Sharma – were the only ones who sought to put things in perspective. But what they said about Article 370 is not the issue under scrutiny. The issue under reference is Kashmiriyat. Nidhi Kulpati repeatedly used this term and asked Harish Rawat if the Congress felt outraged and deeply concerned over the use of this term by the BJP Prime Ministerial candidate Narendra Modi in his speech during Lalkar Rally in Jammu on December 1. She sought to create an impression that it was the Congress that had been using this term and describing its historical significance for years. Interestingly, he endorsed the ill-informed formulation of Nidhi Kulpati, saying, “Kashmiriyat is a reality and the Indian Constitution protects and promotes it”. “The Congress understands India and its uniqueness, but the BJP doesn’t,” he said. He simply exposed himself.

Even what Harish Rawat, who seldom talks sense and quite often jumps on to the bandwagon of ultra-communalists, said Kulpati in response to her innocent query is not the point of discussion. As said, the issue in hand is Kashmiriyat. Put in any amount of effort to find if the term Kashmiriyat found place in any history book or chronicle or in any literary work produced before 1975 or any article that appeared in any newspaper before 1975 and you will come out of the exercise minus everything. The reason is that this term did not exist at all. It was only in 1975 that this term was coined by a Jammu-based politician-cum-columnist Balraj Puri. That was the year the votary of plebiscite, Sheikh Mohammad Abdullah, was brought back to power by the then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi after bringing down her own party’s Government to pander to the protagonists Switzerland-type independent Kashmir.

The people of Jammu province and Ladakh region, besides the minority communities in Kashmir, especially the miniscule minority of Kashmiri Hindus, felt aghast over this dumb-founding and dangerous development for obvious reasons, the most notable being the well-known communal, anti-Jammu and anti-minority and pro-semi-independence credentials of Sheikh Abdullah. Balraj Puri, who had earlier flirted with Sheikh Abdullah and his Valley-based National Conference, joined the party to fulfill his ambition of entering the Lok Sabha on the NC ticket. He got it but suffered a massive defeat at the hands of the patriotic people of Jammu. In between and even thereafter, he continued to use the term Kashmiriyat in his essays to mislead the nation by saying that it stood for liberal, secular and democratic values; it was all-embracing; and it made no distinction between man and man on the ground of caste, creed and religion. His whole objective was to keep Sheikh Abdullah and his son Farooq Abdullah in good humour by projecting them as ardent champions of Kashmiriyat.

Farooq Abdullah as the Chief Minister made him working chairman of the Regional Autonomy Committee immediately after forming his Government in October 1996 with Minister of State status. Kashmiriyat is neither liberal nor all-embracing. It is regressive. It stands for exclusiveness and exclusion of all against the Kashmiri-speaking ethnic Sunnis, who have been in power since October 1947. It is they who control and run all the Kashmir-based ‘mainstream’ political, terrorist and separatist organisations. These include the NC, the Congress, the People’s Democratic Party (PDP), the CPI, the CPI-M, the Jamaat-e-Islami (JI), the ALL-Party Hurriyat Conference – Mirwaiz (APHC-M), APHC (Geelani), Jammu & Kashmir Liberation Front (JKLF), Jammu & Kashmir Democratic Freedom Party (JKDFP), the People’s League (PL), the People’s Conference (PC), the Dukhtran-e-Millat (DeM) and Hizbul Mujahiden (HM) to mention only a few.

The people of Jammu and Ladakh, the Shia Muslims, the Gujjar and Bakerwal Muslims, the Pathowari-speaking Muslims and non-Muslims, the displaced Kashmiri Hindus, the Sikhs, the Christians and others are not part of the so-called Kashmiriyat. In fact, they are its victims. They abhor Kashmiriyat and believe rightly that it has been posing a grave threat to their distinct identity and personality. It was because of this Kashmiriyat that over three lakh Kashmiri Hindus, hundreds of the Sikh families and many Kashmir-based Christians had to quit Kashmir in early 1990 to become refugees in their own country. It is because of Kashmiriyat that the refugees from West Pakistan, women, the SCs, the STs, the OBCs and similar other social groups have suffered, and continue to suffer, immense socio-economic and political losses. And it is because of the recognition and promotion of Kashmiriyat that the nation has been facing serious challenges in the Kashmir Valley.
----------------------------------
http://www.niticentral.com/2013/12/05/what-is-this-kashmiriyat-164787.html
----------------------------------

Modi shows 'mirror' to Abdullah family on secularism in J&K

http://zeenews.india.com/news/general-elections-2014/modi-shows-mirror-to-farooq-abdullah-on-secularism_927950.html
-----------------------------------