Sunday, January 4, 2015


►When Muhammad conquered the pagan Mecca, it worshipped 360 idols. The four most important among them were the moon god, "Sin", also known as "Hubal", also known as "Allah", and his three daughters: Al-Lat, Al-Uzza and Al-Manat.

►Muhammad's attempt to impose monotheism by keeping just Allah and ridding the other 359 Meccan idols faced resistance from Meccans who held Allah's three daughters very dear.

►Eager to be accepted as a prophet in his native Mecca, Muhammad initially conceded that Allah approved of Al-Lat, Al-Uzza and Al-Manat. But unable to reconcile three extra goddesses with his declared monotheism, Muhammad later reversed himself, confessing, "I have fabricated things against Allah and have imputed to him words which he has not spoken." (Al Tabari, The History of Al-Tabari, vol. 6, p.111) and said he had mistaken the words of "Satan" (Ibn Ishaq, Sirat Rasul Allah, pp.165-166) as Allah's.

►Given Allah's true identity, the words of Allah and Satan would not be hard to confuse. Had Muhammad claimed to be a prophet of the God of the Bible, however, someone who hears from Satan, mistakes Satan's words as God's and fabricates "things against" God is a false prophet whom God said above, "shall die".

►According to many Islamic history books, Muhammad's grandfather, Abdoul Muttalib was an infidel, and he never converted to the Islam from his Idols although he supported Muhammad in his goals. why didn't Abdoul Muttalib believe to the Islam? the answer is not so difficult. The point is that he knew his grand son was suffering schizophrenia but he knew that Muhammad can unite the whole Arab society, and by the time, this alliance was necessary for them. When Muhammad died, Abu Sufyan said " there was not any prophet and there was not any message, but Arab society survived from extinction".

Prophet Muhammad's uncle Umar-bin-e-Hassham (also known as Abu Hakam or Abu Jahl) was a renowned poet whose famous Arabic poem in praise of Lord Shiva, included in Sair-ul-Okul runs as under:

Kafavomal fikra min ulumin Tab asayru
Kaluwan amataul Hawa was Tajakhru -
We Tajakhayroba udan Kalalwade-e liboawa
Walukayanay jatally, hay Yauma Tab asayru -
Wa Abalolha ajabu armeeman MAHADEVA
Manojail ilamuddin minhum wa sayattaru -
Wa Sahabi Kay-yam feema-Kamil MINDAY Yauman
Wa Yakulum no latabahan foeennak Tawjjaru -
Massayaray akhalakan hasanan Kullahum
Najumum aja- at Summa gabul HINDU -

The translation in english is in the pic.

Muhammad belonged to Quraysh tribe who were worshippers of Bhagwan Shiva.The Meccans were pagans and when Muhammad conquered Mecca he destroyed 360 of their idols but left the Shivling inside the Kaaba intact.No one is allowed access inside Kaaba except the Saud Royal Family.


Amrita. This herb is also called Giloy or Guduchi. It has great health benefits and has been used in India since the ancient times. The modern medicine is just discovering the secrets of the divine herb. Recently, there have been several outbreaks of Dengue, Malaria, Chronic fevers, Swine flu, Bird flu and several other fevers of unknown origins. Giloy is one herb, which has been effective in fighting these fevers where modern medicine is still struggling to find cures.
Giloy has a long list of medicinal properties- it is anti-inflammatory, anti-diabetic, anti-pyretic, anti-arthritic, diuretic and detoxifying in nature. Some of the health benefits of this wonderful herb are :
For treating arthritis and gout: The anti-inflammatory action of giloy makes it beneficial for treating inflammatory conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis and gout.
Boosts immunity: Giloy acts as a rasayana (rejuvenating agent) on account of its anti-oxidant properties. It is known to boost immunity (by enhancing the efficiency of white blood cells) and aids the removal of toxins from the liver and kidneys and protects from damage caused by free radicals. It also provides protection against disease causing bacteria. Giloy can be used to combat a large number of ailments such as liver diseases, urinary tract infections.
Treating chronic fever: Being an anti-pyretic in nature, giloy can be used to treat chronic fever effectively. It is beneficial for increasing blood platelet count, which makes it useful for alleviating dengue fever. Giloy extract taken daily can help relieve chronic fever. It can be combined with honey and used as a home remedy for malaria.
Digestive health: This herb is an effective means to get rid of digestion related ailments. It can be taken along with amla (Indian Gooseberry) for diabetics. Giloy juice taken along with buttermilk is a classic remedy for indigestion. The same remedy is effective
for piles as well.
Diabetes support: Studies have established that Giloy is an effective hypoglycemic agent, with the ability to reduce blood sugar and lipid levels considerably.This makes it very useful for treatment of type2 diabetes. Diabetics can consume Giloy juice daily to lower blood sugar levels.
Adaptogenic herb: Giloy is used as an adaptogenic herb, that is, it has the ability to relieve mental stress and anxiety. It is also known for its ability to promote memory and longevity by reducing oxidative damage to cells and clearing away brain toxins. Thus, it can also be considered as an anti-aging herb.
Other benefits: Giloy has been found useful in fighting various other health problems. It is known to help in decongestion of lungs, making it useful for respiratory problems such as asthma and chronic cough.It is also used to treat skin disorders such as acne, eczema and psoriasis. The juice can be applied on eyes for healing conjunctivitis. It can also be used for cardiac debility, anemia, jaundice and leprosy.
Following are the links to scientific studies to support the medicinal claims of Giloy:



The career of Prithvi Raj Chauhan has a tragic irony of its own. Though among the bravest of India's warrior heroes, his political naivet=82 bordering on stupidity caused India to knuckle under Muslim rule and usher in an era of unmitigated rape, plunder, chaos, repression and religious conversions which lasted for 600 years.
Rajasthan- During The Rajputs
Prithviraj Chauhan
But what is more tragic is that the Prithvi Raj trait of blundering generosity has continued to haunt all of India's rulers ever since down to Mohandas K. Gandhi, Jawahar L. Nehru and Lal Bahadur Shastri. While the former two, like Prithvi Raj, showed misplaced clemency to the invader and bartered away large chunks of Indian territory for some illusive peace, the latter failed to win back Lahore and Sialkot and the occupied part of Kashmir in the finest hour of India's victory. It will be a day to celebrate when the Prithvi Raj spell of frittering away of India's advantages will be exercised and Indian rulers will once again restore Hinduism to the territories it owned and ruled before Mohammed Qasem's depredations.
Ranathambor Fort
Coins of The Chauhans
Born in 1159 A.D. Prithvi Raj was the last Hindu emperor of India and yet it was he who inflicted some of the most crushing defeats on Muslim invaders. But in spite of putting their armies to rout he committed the blunder of not following the pest to its source and making an end of it. His portrait should hang in India's Cabinet room and Parliament House as a warning to India's future rulers.

Prithviraj Chauhan FortChittaurgarh FortIt is a pity that though Prithvi Raj ranks amongst some of India's greatest warriors, some vital details of his career remain unknown. The alien Muslim spell on India has been so blighting that no body seems to have bothered to piece together the life story of this great warrior and last Hindu emperor from beginning to end. This is a measure of India's tragic neglect of its brave and patriotic traditions.
Prithvi Raj Chauhan is also known as Rai Pithora. The surname Chauhan is the corrupt form of Chahaman. This solar dynasty hailing from Sambhar and Ajmer has given India some of her most distinguished rulers. A scion of that family, Vigraharaj IV, was not only a great warrior and ruler but also a celebrated scholar who wrote a Sanskrit drama.
Prithvi Raj's father, Someshwar, was the brother of Vigraharaj IV. The story of Prithvi Raj and his ruler colleagues of different principalities in India engrossed in their petty squabbles and enmities while Muslim hyenas prowled on India's borders, make depressing reading.
Bheemdeo, the ruler of Gujarat, had killed Prithvi Raj's father Someshwar in battle. Prithvi Raj was, therefore, itching to avenge his father's death. An opportunity presented itself when Bheemdeo asked for the hand in marriage of Ichchhini Kumari, the daughter of Jait Parmar, the ruler of Abu. When his suit was rejected, he threatened invasion. Jait Parmar sought Prithvi Raj's help. Prithvi Raj was only too willing to oblige because he had an old score to settle with Bheemdeo. In the battle fought on the banks of the Sabarmati river within Bheemdeo's territory, Prithvi Raj inflicted a crushing defeat on the former. A grateful Jait Parmar then gave his daughter Ichchhini Kumari in marriage to the proud victor Prithvi Raj.
Prithvi Raj's capital had been Ajmer. That non-descript modern name derives from the delightful Sanskrit word Ajaymeru. What is currently known as the Moinuddin Chishti tomb, the Taragadh, the Adhai-din-ka-Zopda, the Annasagar lake and the city palace, all existed during Prithvi Raj's times. They were part of his fortifications. And yet they have been falsely ascribed to subsequent Muslim usurpers by sycophant chroniclers. The palace in Ajmer town, mischievously credited to Akbar, was the palace in which Prithvi Raj used to stay when in town and not in the nearby mountain fortress of Taragadh.
By a stroke of luck Prithvi Raj also became the owner of the large territories forming part of the kingdom of Delhi. Anangpal, the maternal grandfather of Prithvi Raj, ruled in Delhi. He had two daughters. One of them was the mother of Prithvi Raj while the other had a son called Jaichand who ruled at Kannauj. Having no son, Anangpal willed away the kingdom to Prithvi Raj.
Obviously, so far as bravery and patriotism were concerned, Jaichand was no match to Prithvi Raj. Ananagpal too, in his great wisdom, refused to treat the kingdom of Hindusthan as a chattel to be divided equally between his two maternal grandsons, Prithvi Raj and Jaichand. With unerring judgment he selected Prithvi Raj as his sole heir and successor. He was not the one to countenance any fragmentation of his kingdom. Apparently, Prithvi Raj's weakness in believing in the faithless words of treacherous Muslim invaders, his generosity to his inveterate and unscrupulous Muslim enemies and complacency were later developments.
But wise as Anangpal's choice was, it caused short-sighted jealous and avaricious Jaichand a deep heart-burn. He felt specially piqued because he was much senior in age. Burning in ambition to go down in history as an unchallenged emperor of Hindusthan, Jaichand commenced the traditional Rajsooya Yajnya (sacrifice) to proclaim and claim emperorship. He had a daughter called Sanyogita who felt drawn toward Prithvi Raj.
As a matter of cold formality, Jaichand had invited Prithvi Raj to the Yajnya. It is customary for the host, on such occasions, to allocate various duties connected with the ceremony to his kith and kin so that the guests may be well looked after. To spite Prithvi Raj, Jaichand appointed him chief of the palace guard for the duration of the ceremony. Thereby Prithvi Raj had not only to keep standing outside the palace but do humble obeisance to all and sundry. This imposed duty did not quite accord with his reputation as a fearless warrior and patriot who held promise of being a future emperor.
Prithvi Raj made most of the humble role assigned to him by the inimical master of ceremonies and eloped with the latter's daughter Sanyogita who was already head over heels in love with him (A.D. 1175).
This added to the enmity between the two. Prithvi Raj now made Delhi his home. In 1183 A.D. he launched on a career of conquest and annexed Bundelkhand and other adjoining regions.
It was Prithvi Raj's ambition to consolidate his numerous fragmented kingdoms in one country-wide realm under his leadership. And but for his complacence, misplaced generosity, naivet and haughtiness, he held great promise of being one of India's most farsighted, brave and patriotic rulers.


Tradition has it that Prithvi Raj inflicted 14 crushing defeats on Muslim invaders. But he allowed the enemy to hover on India's borders instead of following the latter to his source and nipping the enemy there. India has committed this blunder umpteen times. It is no use merely turning out hyenas, wolves and tigers from the house, slamming the door in their face and allowing them to go on prowling outside while we sit pretty inside. In the meantime, the simple people in the countryside are ravaged and made to turn against their own country by forced change of religion. Unfortunately, this is happening even today in India and our rulers refuse to learn any lesson from history.
Why teach history in our schools and colleges at all if history is not to teach us any lesson?
But our contemporary leaders are doing something worse. They are fattening and battening the enemy at the cost of the Indian tax-payer by supplying him with our money and our river waters and wishing him many happy returns of his umpteen invasions.
Jaichand, a cousin of Prithvi Raj, was chafing under imaginary scores he had to settle against the latter. Prithvi Raj's rising fortune, valor and victories, added fuel to Jaichand's fire of envy. He swore vengeance at any cost. He, in league with the king of Pattan, in impotent rage against Prithvi Raj's waxing fortune invited Mohammed Ghori, a Muslim gangster marauder prowling on India's borders. Can one imagine a more stupid and suicidal act?
Ghori was only too glad to have some royal Indian stooges to underwrite his adventure in India and avail himself of their royal protection to wage war against mighty Prithvi Raj Chauhan.
The two armies met at a place called Narain alias Tarain or Taraaori in 1191 A.D. According to Farishta, Narain is on the banks of the Sarsuti, 14 miles from Thaneshwar. General Cunningham places it on the banks of the Rakshi river, four miles southwest of Tirauri and ten miles to the north of Karnal. Taraaori was later named Azimabad.
Mohammed Ghori's army was so thoroughly routed that to save his reputation with his gang he rushed lance in hand in the thick of the fray at the elephant on which Gobindrai of Delhi was mounted. The Rai struck back and inflicted a gushing wound on Ghori's arm with his long lance. A Muslim chronicler, Minhaj-us- Siraj, describes these moments of Ghori's agony: "The Sultan reined back his horse and turned aside, and the pain of the wound was so insufferable that he could not support himself on horse-back. The Mussalman army gave way and could not be controlled...When the Mussalmans lost sight of the Sultan, a panic fell upon them; they fled and halted not until they were safe from the pursuit of the victors" (Pg. 296, Vol. II, Elliot and Dowson).
Muslim accounts say that Mohammed Ghori was whisked away by a young Khilji. But Hindu accounts, which seem to be more reliable, assert that Ghori was brought a captive before Prithvi Raj. With characteristic treachery and faithlessness of his tribe, Ghori shed crocodile tears over is folly and craved for pardon promising never again to violate India's borders. Prithvi Raj was a fool to believe in the Muslim's promises. He should have been well aware of the depredations and treason since the time of Mohammed Qasem.
In order that such lessons of history may not be lost on the reigning monarch, according to ancient traditions, a monarch's routine enjoined upon him to spend some time every day listening to the history of his ancestors and country.
Either that thoughtful provision had not been continued during Prithvi Raj's time or he failed to derive any benefit from it, and he ordered Mohammed Ghori's unconditional release.
In this Prithvi Raj should have taken a lesson from the Muslims themselves. In Muslim internecine warfare, brother used to murder a brother for the father's throne or at least scoop out the eyes of his fraternal adversary. Had Prithvi Raj dealt the same punishment and meted out justice to the aggressor, he would have saved generations of Indians untold misery and humiliation. Instead, he committed the folly of allowing an injured snake to slither away only to come back with more venom. All that Mohammed Ghori was asked to remit by way of reparations was 8,000 horses which the gangster gladly did.
The success seems to have gone to Prithvi Raj's head. He became progressively unmindful of his royal duties. His wife Sanyogita appears to have exercised an unwholesome influence upon him. They perhaps preferred to live in a romantic isolation!
Prtihvi Raj made himself unapproachable even to his counselors and erstwhile colleagues. He neglected the cultivation of good and friendly alliances with his fellow princes. On the other hand, he alienated the sympathies of many because of his haughty isolation. Chaos and dissatisfaction followed Prithvi Raj's despotic and whimsical behavior. An honest and faithful nobleman, Chamundrai, was put in prison on some flimsy and trumped up charges. The vigilant chief minister, Kalmas, was done to death. This alienated the sympathies of some of Prithvi Raj's courtiers. They plotted against him and secretly extended their help to Ghori. Among the contemporary rulers Bheemdeo was not interested in helping Prithvi Raj because of their old antagonism. Jaichand, though a near cousin, was a sworn enemy of Prithvi Raj. Jaichand invited Ghori once again to attack Prithvi Raj.
Their second engagement took place in 1192 A.D. again on the same battlefield near Thaneshwar. About 150 princes had gathered under Prtihvi Raj's standard but their hearts were hardly with Prithvi Raj. He had done nothing to win their love and loyalty.
Prithvi Raj had also neglected gathering intelligence of the Muslim enemy's armies and moves. Ghori, on his own part, had shown better earnestness of purpose by meticulously collecting all intelligence about Prithvi Raj's army and tactics.
Aware of the great threat that Ghori, aided by Jaichand and some other Hindu princes presented, Prithvi Raj's supporters such as Chamundrai, Samar Sinha and Hamir Hada swore by the holy Ganga water to stand by him in battle at all costs.
When the engagement commenced Indian valor proved superior and Ghori's ranks were broken. As they fell back in disorder and prepared to flee, Prithvi Raj's army, either due to bad leadership or complacence and neglect, fell into disarray and set in disorderly pursuit of the enemy. Assessing the potentialities of the situation, Ghori retreated to a safe distance.
He then negotiated for a truce for the night. Drunk with two easy victories, Prithvi Raj's army consented not to press the attack during the night. They sheathed their swords and snored away with a faithless and treacherous enemy like Ghori licking his wounds. Seeing Prithvi Raj's army complacently encamped and dotingly resting for the night, Ghori led a stealthy but savage attack at the dead of night. Taken unawares, the Rajputs, despite their supreme bravery, were annihilated. Prithvi Raj was captured and produced before Ghori. When Prithvi Raj reminded Ghori of the day when the former had magnanimously allowed the latter to go free, Mohammed Ghori contemptuously replied that he was not an idiot to let loose an enemy. So saying he ordered that Prithvi Raj be tortured to death.. His order was faithfully carried out. A valiant but stupid son of India thus met his death at the hands of a 32-year-old criminal, Ghori.
There is, however, another version about Prtihvi Raj's end. See the previous narration on Mohammed Ghori, the terrorist and tyrant. Traitor Jaichand too met a sad end; neither did Ghori die peacefully in his bed among his kith and kin. His head was chopped off in his own tent by a group of Hindu warriors.
The story of Prithvi Raj and Jaichand should serve as an eye- opener to India's rulers and prevent them from repeating for the umpteenth time the same mistake of complacency and naively fattening the enemy on India's frontiers.

Saturday, January 3, 2015

American CIA's plan to Christianize India through USAID funded Christian NGO s ?

Religious expansionism has not witnessed this scale, scope, and state resources in a long time. Detailed investigations by Tehelka reveal that American evangelical agencies have established in India an enormous, well-coordinated and strategised religious conversion plan. The operation was launched in the early 1990s but really came into its own after George W Bush Jr, an avowed born-again Christian, became president of the United States in 2001. Since then, aggressive evangelists have found pro-active support from the new administration in their efforts to convert some sections of Indian society to Christianity. At the heart of this complex and sophisticated operation is a simple strategy-convert locals and then give them the know-how and money to plant their own churches and multiply.
Around the time that Bush Jr moved into the Oval office, a worldwide conversion movement, funded and effected by American evangelical groups, was peaking in India. The movement, which began as AD2000 & Beyond and later morphed into Joshua Project I and Joshua Project II, was designed to be a sledgehammer-a breathtaking, decade-long steamroller of a campaign that would set the stage for a systematic, sophisticated and self-sustaining "harvest" of the "unreached people groups" in India in the 21st century. It was just as the operation was taking off that the script changed. Much to the delight of American evangelicals, one of their own, George Bush Jr, became the occupant of the White House.
In a major policy decision taken very early into his presidency, Bush, on January 29, 2001, unveiled a "faith based" social service initiative that included a new White House office to promote government aid to churches and Christian faith-based organisations. This, in effect, threw the massive weight of the federal government behind religious groups and religious conversions. The Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives was set up in the White House in the first week of February 2002 and a man called Jim Towey was appointed director. (A snap introduction to Towey: he was the legal counsel to Mother Teresa in the late 1980s.)

Though Bush's initiative to fund "salvation and religious conversion" is stalled in the Congress over constitutional and civil rights concerns, he has pushed for its implementation through executive orders.
White House-Christian Coalition nexus
The American press is replete with reports on Bush's largesse to faith-based organisations. They say it's his "return gift" to the Christian Right for having loyally supported his presidential campaign. The Christian Coalition, founded by American TV evangelist and head of the multi-billion Christian Broadcasting Network (CBN), Pat Robertson, played a crucial role in the 2000 election. Recently, in his TV programme, Club 700, broadcast on CBN, Robertson created a stir by announcing that he is confident Bush will win the 2004 election in a "blowout" because God has told him so.
Indeed, Bush is keen to retain what we call the votebank and Americans 'the base'. After all, the Far Right Christian evangelists have also been the most loyal backers of his hardline militarism in Afghanistan, Iraq and elsewhere.
But there is another, perhaps more important, reason why Bush is keen on supporting his evangelist friends who run huge transnational missionary organisations (TMOs). In the decade 1990-2000 they ran a global intelligence operation so complex and sophisticated that its scale and implications are no less than staggering. This operation has put in place a system which enables the US government to access any ethnographic information on any location virtually at the click of the mouse. This network in India, established with funding and strategic assistance from US-based TMOs, gives US intelligence agencies virtually real time access to every nook and corner of the country. (See 'List of TMOs Active in India')
Since Bush's ascendancy to the presidency this network of networks has multiplied rapidly in India. Bush supports conversion in India because he supports those American TMOs who fund and strategise conversion activities in this country. Organisations like the International Mission Board, Southern Baptist Convention, Christian Aid, World Vision, Seventh Day Adventist Church and multi-billion enterprises run by evangelists like Pat Robertson, Billy Graham and Roger Houtsma, amongst many others, were instrumental in running a coordinated conversion campaign in India under the banner of AD2000. These later became the Joshua Project and when the decade-long movement officially closed down in March 2001, Joshua Project II was launched to sustain conversions and intelligence-gathering. Graham's TMO, Billy Graham Evangelist Association, supports conversion activities in Gurgaon, Haryana, and Kolkata.
When AD2000 was conceived for India, the plan was based on a military model with the intent to invade, occupy, control, or subjugate its population. It was based on solid intelligence emanating from the ground and well-researched information on various facets of selected people groups. The idea was to send out spying missions to source micro details on religion and culture. The social and economic divisions in the various Indian communities were closely examined. Given the oppressive and institutionalised caste system in the Hindu society, American evangelical strategists chalked out plans for reaching these various "unmixable" caste groups. The many faultlines running through the country-divisions in terms of ethnicity, caste, creed, language and class-were all factored in during the generation of ethnographic data.
North India was designated the core target of American evangelists. It was described as the "core of the core of the core" of a worldwide evangelical movement conceived by fundamentalist American missionaries. This movement that took shape over the 1990s, has now taken off because of a unique collaboration between the American government and US-based evangelical mission agencies. In the 1990s this movement was shaped by the World Evangelical Fellowship (an international alliance of national evangelical alliances), working with the AD2000 movement. It brought together a wide variety of individuals and organisations, under the single goal of achieving "a church for every people and the gospel for every person by the year 2000." Its focus was missionary mobilisation and church planting in India and other regions of the world where the Christian population was negligible. This movement was also a massive intelligence gathering exercise funded and supported by American missionary organisations that were responsible for the election of George W Bush.
Global evangelism plans
AD2000 first attracted attention at a convention of international evangelical missions called Lausanne II in Manila in 1989. The movement then spread rapidly around the globe to help catalyse evangelism. The strategy behind the movement was to establish pioneering global partnerships to eventually provide a church within every "unreached people group". Ralph Winter, founder of the US Center for World Mission, characterised the movement as "the largest, most pervasive global evangelical network ever to exist."
This movement, spearheaded by Luis Bush from the movement's headquarters in Colorado Springs, US, was planned for large conversion of people living within the "10/40 Window". Incidentally, Billy Graham, a Christian fundamentalist and rabid evangelist, who was responsible for George W's "born again" Christian status and whom the president considers as his godfather was the hon
orary co-chairman of the AD 2000 movement


Eusebius : Eusebius (/ju?'si?bi?s/; Greek: ??s?ß???; 260/265 – 339/340 AD; also called Eusebius of Caesarea and Eusebius Pamphili), was a Roman historian, of Greek descent, exegete and Christian polemicist. He became the Bishop of Caesarea about A.D 314. Together with Pamphilus, he was a scholar of the Biblical canon and is regarded as an extremely well learned Christian of his time.
Eusebius states the Ethiopians to have come and settled in Egypt, in the time of Amenophis. According to this account, as well as to the account given by Philostratus, there was no such country as Ethiopia beyond Egypt until this invasion. According to Eusebius these people came from the river Indus, and planted themselves to the south of Egypt, in the country called from them Ethiopia. The circumstance named by Eusebius that they came from the Indus, at all events, implies that they came from the East, and not from the South, and would induce a person to suspect them of having crossed the Red Sea from Arabia : they must either have done this, or have come round the northern end of the Red Sea by the Isthmus of Suez ; but they certainly could not have come from the present Ethiopia.
But there are several passages in ancient writers which prove that Eusebius is right in saying, not only that they came from the East, but from a very distant or very eastern part.

Friday, January 2, 2015

Bible story is wrong about Christ- in hindi.

must read it..
क्राइस्ट का नाम क्राइस्ट क्यों है?
Aditya Agnihotri's photo.

यीशु का नाम ईसा मसीह क्यों है? और यह नाम किसने व कब रखे? आप कुछ भी कहानी गढ़ सकते हैं। लेकिन हम यहां तथ्यों की बात करेंगे तर्कों की नहीं।
ईसा मसीह ने 13 साल से 30 साल की उम्र के मध्य में क्या किया, यह रहस्य की बात है। बाइबबिल में उनके इन वर्षों के बारे में कुछ भी उल्लेख नहीं मिलता है। 30 वर्ष की उम्र में उन्होंने येरुशलम में यूहन्ना (जॉन) से दीक्षा ली। दीक्षा के बाद वे लोगों को शिक्षा देने लगे।
अनुसार सन् 29 ई. को प्रभु ईसा गधे पर चढ़कर येरुशलम पहुंचे। वहीं उनको दंडित करने का षडयंत्र रचा गया। अंतत: उन्हें विरोधियों ने पकड़कर क्रूस पर लटका दिया। उस वक्त उनकी उम्र लगभग 33 वर्ष थी।
ईसा मसीह का जिक्र भविष्य पुराण में मिलता है। भविष्य पुराण कब लिखा गया इस पर विवाद हो सकता है, पर यह तो तय है कि इसे ईसा मसीह के बाद लिखा गया था। यह संभवत: मध्यकाल में लिखा गया होगा।
हिमालय क्षेत्र में ईसा मसीह की मुलाकात उज्जैन के राजा विक्रमादित्य के पौत्र से होने का छोटा-सा वर्णन मिलता है। इससे यह भी तय हो गया कि भविष्य पुराण विक्रमादित्य के पौत्र के बाद या उसके काल में लिखा गया होगा। हिन्दू लोग भले ही कहते रहे हैं कि इसे वेद व्यास ने लिखा था, लेकिन सच तो सच ही होता है।
लुइस जेकोलियत ने 1869 ई. में अपनी एक पुस्तक 'द बाइबिल इन इंडिया' में लिखा है कि जीसस क्राइस्ट और भगवान श्रीकृष्ण एक थे। लुइस जेकोलियत फ्रांस के एक साहित्यकार थे।
'द बाइबिल इन इंडिया में कृष्ण और क्राइस्ट पर एक तुलनात्मक अध्ययन प्रस्तुत किया है। 'जीसस' शब्द के विषय में लुइस ने कहा है कि क्राइस्ट को 'जीसस' नाम भी उनके अनुयायियों ने दिया है। इसका संस्कृत में अर्थ होता है 'मूल तत्व'।
'द बाइबिल इन इंडिया में यह भी कहा है कि क्राइस्ट शब्द कृष्ण का ही रूपांतरण है, हालांकि उन्होंने कृष्ण की जगह क्रिसना शब्द का इस्तेमाल किया। भारत में गांवों में कृष्ण को क्रिसना ही कहा जाता है।
क्रिसना ही क्राइस्ट और ख्रिस्तान हो गया। बाद में यही क्रिश्चियन हो गया। लुइस के अनुसार ईसा मसीह अपने भारत भ्रमण के दौरान जगन्नाथ के मंदिर में रुके थे।
एक रूसी लेखक निकोलस नोकोविच ने भारत में कुछ वर्ष रहकर प्राचीन हेमिस बौद्घ आश्रम में रखी पुस्तक 'द लाइफ ऑफ संत ईसा' पर आधारित फ्रेंच भाषा में 'द अननोन लाइफ ऑफ जीसस क्राइस्ट' नामक पुस्तक लिखी है।
प्राचीन हेमिस बौद्घ आश्रम लद्दाख के लेह मार्ग पर स्थित है। किताब के अनुसार ईसा मसीह सिल्क रूट से भारत आए थे और यह आश्रम इसी तरह के सिल्क रूट पर था। उन्होंने 13 से 29 वर्ष की उम्र तक यहां रहकर बौद्घ धर्म की शिक्षा ली और निर्वाण के महत्व को समझा।
30 साल की उम्र में येरुशलम लौटकर उन्होंने यूहन्ना (जॉन) से दीक्षा ली। दीक्षा के बाद वे लोगों को शिक्षा देने लगे। ज्यादातर विद्वानों के अनुसार सन् 29 ई. को प्रभु ईसा गधे पर चढ़कर येरुशलम पहुंचे।
षडयंत्र रचा गया। अंतत: उन्हें विरोधियों ने पकड़कर क्रूस पर लटका दिया। उस वक्त उनकी उम्र थी लगभग 33 वर्ष।
18 वर्ष भारत के कश्मीर और लद्दाख के हिन्दू और बौद्ध आश्रमों में रहकर बौद्घ एवं हिन्दू धर्म ग्रंथों एवं अध्यात्मिक विषयों का गहन अध्ययन किया। निकोलस लिखते हैं कि वे लद्दाख के बौद्ध हेमिस मठ में रुके थे।
अपनी भारत यात्रा के दौरान जीसस ने उड़ीसा के जगन्नाथ मंदिर की भी यात्रा की थी एवं यहां रहकर इन्होंने अध्ययन किया था।
क्रूस पर लटका ने के 3 दिन बाद ये अपने परिवार और मां मैरी के साथ तिब्बत के रास्ते भारत आ गए। भारत में श्रीनगर के पुराने इलाके को इन्होंने अपना ठिकाना बनाया।
80साल की उम्र में जीसस क्राइस्ट की मृत्यु हुई। उन्हें वहीं दफना दिया गया और उनकी कब्र आज भी वहीं पर है। लोग इस पर विश्वास करें या न करें लेकिन यह सत्य है।
लोकोविच ने तिब्बत के मठों में ईसा से जुड़ी ताड़ पत्रों पर अंकित दुर्लभ पांडुलिपियों का अनुवाद किया जिसमें लिखा था, 'सुदूर देश इसराइल में ईसा मसीह नाम के दिव्य बच्चे का जन्म हुआ।
13-14 वर्ष की आयु में वो व्यापारियों के साथ हिन्दुस्तान आ गया तथा सिंध प्रांत में रुककर बुद्ध की शिक्षाओं का अध्ययन किया। फिर वो पंजाब की यात्रा पर निकल गया और वहां के जैन संतों के साथ समय व्यतीत किया।
इसके बाद जगन्नाथपुरी पहुंचा, जहां के पुरोहितों ने उसका भव्य स्वागत किया। वह वहां 6 वर्ष रहा। वहां रहकर उसने वेद और मनु स्मृति का अपनी भाषा में अनुवाद किया।
वहां से निकलकर वो राजगीर, बनारस समेत कई और तीर्थों का भ्रमण करते हुए नेपाल के हिमालय की तराई में चला गया और वहां जाकर बौद्ध ग्रंथों तथा तंत्रशास्त्र का अध्ययन किया फिर पर्शिया आदि कई मुल्कों की यात्रा करते हुए वह अपने वतन लौट गया।
एक जर्मन विद्वान होल्गर कर्स्टन ने 1981 में अपने गहन अनुसन्धान के आधार पर एक पुस्तक लिखी 'जीसस लिव्ड इन इण्डिया: हिज लाइफ बिफोर एंड ऑफ्टर क्रूसिफिक्शन' में ये सिद्ध करने का प्रयास किया कि जीसस ने भारत में रहकर ही बुद्ध धर्म में दीक्षा ग्रहण की और वे एक बौद्ध थे।
उन्होंने बौद्धमठ में रहकर तप-योग ध्यान साधना आदि किया। इस योग साधना के कारण ही क्रॉस पर उनका जीवन बच गया था जिसके बाद वो पुनः अपने अनुयायियों की सहायता से भारत आ गए थे।
लदाख में हेमिस गुम्फा नामक बौद्ध मठ में रहे। बाद में श्रीनगर में उनका वृद्धावस्था में देहांत हुआ। वहां आज भी उनकी मजार है।
यीशु पर लिखी किताब के लेखक स्वामी परमहंस योगानंद ने दावा किया है कि यीशु के जन्म के बाद उन्हें देखने बेथलेहेम पहुंचे तीन विद्वान भारतीय ही थे, जो बौद्ध थे। भारत से पहुंचे इन्हीं तीन विद्वानों ने यीशु का नाम 'ईसा' रखा था।
जिसका संस्कृत में अर्थ 'भगवान' होता है। एक दूसरी मान्यता अनुसार बौद्ध मठ में उन्हें 'ईशा' नाम मिला जिसका अर्थ है, मालिक या स्वामी। 'ईश' या 'ईशान' शब्द का इस्तेमाल भगवान शंकर के लिए भी किया जाता है।
स्वामी परमहंस योगानंद की किताब 'द सेकेंड कमिंग ऑफ क्राइस्ट: द रिसरेक्शन ऑफ क्राइस्ट विदिन यू' में यह दावा किया गया है कि प्रभु यीशु ने भारत में कई वर्ष बिताए और यहां योग तथा ध्यान साधना की।
इस पुस्तक में यह भी दावा किया गया है कि 13 से 30 वर्ष की अपनी उम्र के बीच ईसा मसीह ने भारतीय ज्ञान दर्शन और योग का गहन अध्ययन व अभ्यास किया था।

Thursday, January 1, 2015


वैधानिक चेतावनी : ये पोस्ट आपका मानसिक संतुलन बिगाड़ सकती है
इसलिये इस न पढ़ेँ इसे पढ़कर पागल होने वाले किसी भी ठलुये के प्रति मेरी
की कोई जबावदेही नहीँ होगी !
यह सच हर हिंदू को पता होना चाहिए... एक बार इसे पढ़े जरुर.....
दरअसल ..... जहाँ देखो वहाँ गुजरात के दंगो के बारे में ही सुनने और देखने
को मिलता है... फिर चाहे वो गूगल हो या फेसबुक .. हो या फिर
टीवी...! रोज नए-नए खुलासे हो रहे हैं.....रोज गुजरात की सरकार को कटघरे
में खड़ा किया जाता है...!
असल में.....सबका निशाना केवल एक नरेन्द्र भाई मोदी.....क्योंकि, वे हम
हिन्दुओं के चहेते हैं... जिस कारण मुस्लिम तथा सेकुलर जी- जान से इस काम में
जुटे हैं...! जिसे देखो... वो अपने को जज दिखाता है.... हर कोई सेकुलरता के
नाम पर एक ही स्वर में गुजरात दंगो की भर्त्सना करते हैं.....
हालाँकि, मै भी दंगो को गलत मानता हूँ क्योंकि दंगे सिर्फ दर्द दे कर
जाते हैं ...!
लेकिन...... सबसे बड़ा सवाल यह है कि.....गुजरात दंगा हुआ क्यों..........? 27
फरवरी २००२ को साबरमती ट्रेन के S6 बोगी को गोधरा रेलवे स्टेशन से
करीब 826 मीटर की दुरी पर जला दिया गया था....जिसमे 57 मासूम,
निहत्थे और निर्दोष हिन्दू कारसेवकों की मौत हो गयी थी... ! प्रथम
द्रष्टा रहे वहाँ के 14 पुलिस के जवान जो उस समय स्टेशन पर मौजूद थे.. और
उनमे से 3 पुलिस वाले घटना स्थल पर पहुंचे और साथ ही पहुंचे अग्नि शमन दल के
एक जवान सुरेशगिरी गोसाई जी....! अगर हम इन चारो लोगों की मानें
"म्युनिसिपल काउंसिलर हाजी बिलाल" भीड़ को आदेश दे रहे थे.... ट्रेन के
इंजन को जलाने का......! साथ ही साथ.... जब ये जवान आगबुझाने
की कोशिश कर रहे थे..... तब भीड़ के द्वारा ट्रेन पर पत्थरबाजी चालू कर
दी गई ......!
अब इसके आगे बढ़ कर देखें तो....
जब गोधरा पुलिस स्टेशन की टीम पहुंची तब 2 लोग 10 ,000 की भीड़
को उकसा रहे थे.... ये थे म्युनिसिपल प्रेसिडेंट मोहम्मद कलोटा और
म्युनिसिपल काउंसिलर हाजी बिलाल.....!अब सवाल उठता है कि.....
मोहम्मद कलोटा और हाजी बिलाल को किसने उकसाया और ये ट्रेन
को जलाने क्यों गए......?????
सवालो के बाढ़ यही नहीं रुकते हैं..... बल्कि सवालो की लिस्ट
अभी काफी लम्बी है......
अब सवाल उठता है कि .... क्यों मारा गया ऐसे राम भक्तो को......???
कुछ मीडिया ने बताया की ये मुसलमानों को उकसाने वाले नारे
लगा रहे….अब क्या कोई बताएगा कि ..... क्या भगवान राम के भजन
मुसलमानों को उकसाने वाले लगते हैं......?????
लेकिन इसके पहले भी एक हादसा हुआ 27 फ़रवरी 2002 को सुबह 7 .43 मिनट 4
घंटे की देरी से जैसे ही साबरमती ट्रेन चली और प्लेटफ़ॉर्म छोड़ा तो...
प्लेटफ़ॉर्म से 100 मीटर की दुरी पर ही 1000 लोगो की भीड़ ने ट्रेन पर
पत्थर चलाने चालूकर दिए .....! पर, यहाँ रेलवे की पुलिस ने भीड़ को तितर-
बितर कर दिया और ट्रेन को आगे के लिए रवाना कर दिया.....!
लेकिन, जैसे ही ट्रेन मुश्किल से 800 मीटर चली...... अलग-अलग बोगियों से
कई बार चेन खींची गई....! बाकी की कहानी जिस पर
बीती उसकी जुबानी.......... उस समय मुश्किल से से
15-16 की बच्ची की जुबानी......... ये बच्ची थी कक्षा 11 में पढने
वाली गायत्री पंचाल जो कि उस समय अपने परिवार के साथ
अयोध्या से लौट रही थी .... उसकी मानें तो... ट्रेन में राम धुनचल
रहा था और ट्रेनजैसे ही गोधरा से आगे बढ़ी ..... एक दम से चेन खींच कर रोक
दिया गया ...! उसके बाद देखने में आया कि ... एक भीड़ हथियारों से लैस
हो कर ट्रेन की तरफ बढ़ रही है.....! हथियार भी कैसे....... लाठी-
डंडा नहीं बल्कि.... तलवार, गुप्ती, भाले, पेट्रोल बम्ब, एसिड बम और
पता नहीं क्या क्या.........! भीड़ को देख कर ट्रेन में सवार यात्रियों ने
खिड़की और दरवाजे बंद कर लिए.......! पर भीड़ में से जो अन्दर घुस आए
थे ...वो कार सेवको को मार रहे थे और उनके सामानों को लूट रहे थे और
साथ ही बाहर खड़ी भीड़ मारो -काटो के नारे लगा रही थी....! एक
लाउड स्पीकर जो कि पास के मस्जिद पर था.उससे बार बार ये आदेश
दिया जा रहा था कि ..... “मारो... काटो.. लादेन ना दुश्मनों ने
मारो” ! इसके साथ ही.... साथ ही बहार खड़ी भीड़ ने पेट्रोल डाल कर
आग लगाना चालू कर दिया... जिससे कोई जिन्दा ना बचे....! ट्रेन
की बोगी में चारो तरफ पेट्रोल भरा हुआ था....! दरवाजे बाहर से बंद कर
दिए गए थे , ताकि कोई बाहर ना निकल सके...! एस-6 और एस-7 के वैक्यूम
पाइप काट दिए गए थे ...... ताकि ट्रेन आगे बढ़ ही नहीं सके......! जो लोग
जलती ट्रेन से किसी प्रकार बाहर निकल भी गए तो.... उन्हें तेज
हथियारों से काट दिया गया .... कुछ गहरे घाव की वजह से वहीँ मारे गए
और कुछ बुरी तरह घायल हो गए....!
अब सवाल उठता है कि.... हिन्दुओं ने सुबह 8 बजे ही दंगा क्यों नहीं शुरू कर
किया बल्कि हिन्दू उस दिन दोपहर तक शांत बना रहा (ये बात आज तक
किसी को नहीं दिखी है)....????????
असल में..... हिन्दुओं ने जवाब देना तब चालू किया जब उनके घरों , गावों ,
मोहल्लो में वो जली और कटी फटी लाशें पहुंची......!
क्या ये लाशें हिन्दुओं को को मुसलमानों की तरफ से गिफ्ट
थी जो हिन्दुओं को शांत बैठना चाहिए था .....
सेकुलर बन कर ???????
हिन्दू सड़क पर उतरे 27 फ़रवरी 2002 की दोपहर से.....! पुरे एक दिन हिन्दू
शांति से घरो में बैठे रहे....| अगर वो दंगा हिन्दुओं ने या मोदी ने
करना था तो 27 फ़रवरी 2002 की सुबह 8 बजे से ही क्यों नहीं चालू
मोदी ने 28 फ़रवरी 2002 की शाम को ही आर्मी को सडको पर लाने
का आदेश दिया जो कि अगले ही दिन १ मार्च २००२ को हो गया और
सडको पर आर्मी उतर आयी ..... गुजरात को जलने से बचाने के लिए....! पर
भीड़ के आगे आर्मी भी कम पड़ रही थी तो १ मार्च २००२ को ही मोदी ने
अपने पडोसी राज्यों से सुरक्षा कर्मियों की मांग करी...!
ये पडोसी राज्य थे महाराष्ट्र (कांग्रेस शासित- विलास राव देशमुख -
मुख्य मंत्री), मध्य प्रदेश (कांग्रेस शासित- दिग्विजय सिंह -मुख्य मंत्री),
राजस्थान (कांग्रेस शासित- अशोक गहलोत- मुख्य मंत्री) और पंजाब
(कांग्रेस शासित- अमरिंदर सिंह मुख्य मंत्री) ...! क्या कभी किसी ने
भी.......... इन माननीय मुख्यमंत्रियों से एक बार भी पुछा है कि ........ अपने
सुरक्षाकर्मी क्यों नहीं भेजे गुजरात में जबकि गुजरात ने आपसे
सहायता मांगी थी..........??????? या ये एक सोची समझी गूढ़
राजनितिक विद्वेष का परिचायक था.... इन प्रदेशो के
मुख्यमंत्रियों का गुजरात को सुरक्षा कर्मियों का ना भेजना...????
उसी 1 मार्च 2002 को हमारे राष्ट्रीय मानवाधिकार (National Human
Rights) वालो ने मोदी को अल्टीमेटम दिया ३ दिन में पुरे घटनाक्रम
का रिपोर्ट पेश करने के लिए ...! लेकिन... कितने आश्चर्य की बात है कि...
यही राष्ट्रीय मानवाधिकार वाले २७ फ़रवरी २००२ और २८ फ़रवरी २००२
को गायब रहे ..... इन मानवाधिकार वालो ने तो पहले दिन के ट्रेन के फूंके
जाने पर ये रिपोर्ट भी नहीं माँगा कि क्या कदम उठाया गया गुजरात
सरकार के द्वारा...!
एक ऐसे ही सबसे बड़े घटना क्रम में दिखाए गए या कहे तो बेचे गए........
“गुलबर्ग सोसाइटी” के जलने की.......
इस गुलबर्ग सोसाइटी ने पुरे मीडिया का ध्यान अपने तरफ खींच लिया |
यहाँ एक पूर्व सांसद एहसान जाफरी साहब रहते थे......! इन महाशय
का ना तो एक भी बयान था २७ फरवरी २००२ को और ना ही ये डरे थे उस
समय तक.......! लेकिन...... जब २८ फरवरी २००२ की सुबह जब कुछ लोगो ने इनके
घर को घेरा जिसमे कुछ तथाकथित मुसलमान भी छुपे हुए थे..... तो एहसान
जाफरी जी ने भीड़ पर गोली चलवा दिया ........ अपने लोगो से जिसमे 2
हिन्दू मरे और 13 हिन्दू गंभीर रूप से घायल हो गए.....! जब इस घटनाक्रम के
बाद इनके घर पर भीड़ बढ़ने लगी तो ये अपने यार-दोस्तों को फ़ोन करने लगे
और तभी गैस सिलिंडर के फटने से कुल 42 लोगों की मौत हो गयी....!
यहाँ शायद भीड़ के आने पर ही एहसान साहब को पुलिस को फ़ोन
करना चाहिए था ना कि खुद के बन्दों के द्वारा गोली चलवाना चाहिए
था....! पर इन्होने गोली चलाने के बाद फ़ोन किया डाइरेक्टर जेनेरल ऑफ़
पुलिस (DGP ) को......!
यहाँ एक और झूठ सामने आया..... जब अरुंधती रॉय जैसी लेखिका तक ने
यहाँ तक लिख दिया कि ... एहसान जाफरी की बेटी को नंगा करके
बलात्कार के बाद मारा गया और साथ ही एहसान जाफरी को भी.....!
लेकिन.....यहाँ एहसान जाफरी के बड़े बेटे ने ही पोल खोल दी कि .... जिस
दिन उसके पिता की जान गई उस दिन उसकी बहन तो अमेरिका में थी और
अभी भी रहती है.....! तो यहाँ.......... कौन किसको झूठे केस में
फंसाना चाह रहा है ये साफ़ है....! अब यहाँ तक
तो सही था..............पर............. गोधरा में साबरमती को कैसे इस दंगे से
अलग किया जाता और हिन्दुओं को इसके लिए आरोपित
किया जाता ...! इसके लिए लोग गोधरा के दंगे को ऐसे तो संभाल
नहीं सकते थे ...अपने शब्दों से....
तो एक कहानी प्रकाश में आई.....! कहानी थी कि ....कारसेवक
गोधरा स्टेशन पर चाय पीने उतरे और चाय देने वाला जो कि एक मुसलमान
था उसको पैसे नहीं दिए… जबकि गुजराती अपनी ईमानदारी के लिए
ही जाने जाते हैं…! चलिए छोडिये ये धर्मान्धो की कहानी में
कभी दिखेगा ही नहीं....
आगे बढ़ते हैं...|
अब कारसेवको ने पैसा तो दिया नहीं बल्कि मुसलमान की दाढ़ी खींच
कर उसको मारने लगे तभी उस बूढ़े मुसलमान की बेटी जो की 16 साल
की बताई गई वो आई तो कारसेवको ने उसको बोगी में खींच कर
बोगी का दरवाजा अन्दर से बंद कर लिया ..! और इसीके के प्रतिफल
में.......मुसलमानों ने ट्रेन में आग लगा दी और 58 लोगो को मार दिया.....
जिन्दा जलाकर या काट कर.....!
अब अगर इस मनगढ़ंत कहानी को मान भी लें तो कई सवाल उठते हैं:-
क्या उस बूढ़े मुसलमान चाय वाले ने रेलवे पुलिस
को इत्तिला किया...??????? रेलवे पुलिस उस ट्रेन को वहाँ से जाने
नहीं देती या लड़की को उतार लिया जाता..... उस बूढ़े चाय वाले ने 27
फ़रवरी 2002 को कोई FIR क्यों नहीं दाखिल किया...????? 5 मिनट में
ही सैकड़ो लीटर पेट्रोल और इतनी बड़ी भीड़ आखिर जुटी कैसे....????????
सुबह 8 बजे सैकड़ो लीटर पेट्रोल आखिर आया कहाँ से...................?????????
एक भी केस 27 फ़रवरी २००२ की तारीख में मुसलमानों के
द्वारा क्यों नहीं दाखिल हुआ..........??????? अब रेलवे पुलिस कि जांच में
ये बात सामने आई कि ...... उस दिन गोधरा स्टेसन पर कोई ऐसी घटना हुई
ही नहीं थी...! ना तो चाय वाले के साथ कोई झगडा हुआ था और
ना ही किसी लड़की के साथ में कोई बदतमीजी या अपहरण
की घटना हुई.....!
इसके बाद आयी नानावती रिपोर्ट में कहा गया है कि .... जमीअत-
उलमा-इ-हिंद का हाथ था उन 58 लोगो के जलने में और ट्रेन के जलने में....!
उससे भी बड़ी बात कि.....दंगे में 720 मुसलमान मरे तो 250 हिन्दू भी मरे.....!
मुसलमानों के मरने का सभी शोक मनाते हैं........चाहे वो सेकुलर हिन्दू हो....
चाहे वो मुसलमान हो या चाहे वो राजनेता या मीडिया हो ! पर दंगे में
250 मरे हुए हिन्दुओं और साबरमती ट्रेन में मरे ५८ हिंदुवो को कोई
नहीं पूछता है....कोई बात तक नहीं करता है ..! सभी को केवल मरे हुए
मुसलमान ही दिखते हैं...!
एक और बात काबिले गौर है क्या किसी भी मुस्लिम लीडर का बयान
आया था साबरमती ट्रेन के जलने पर....??????? क्या किसी मुस्लिम लीडर
ने साबरमती ट्रेन को चिता बनाने के लिए खेद प्रकट किया.....?????????
इसीलिए सच को जानिए...... और जो भी गुजरात दंगे की बात करे
अथवा नरेन्द्र मोदी के बारे में बोले....... उसे उसी की भाषा में जबाब दें....!
गुजरात दंगा..... मुस्लिमों के द्वारा शुरू किया गया था..... और हम
हिन्दुओं को उनसे इस बात का जबाब मांगना चाहिए..... और उन्हें
जिम्मेदार ठहराना चाहिए....!
अथवा... क्या वे लाशें हिन्दुओं को को मुसलमानों की तरफ से गिफ्ट
थी जो हिन्दुओं को शांत बैठना चाहिए था .....?????? जय महाकाल...!!!
स्रोत: जय हिंद हिन्दू भारत का लेख... dated 2 may 2012 नोट: इस पोस्ट
को इतना शेयर करें कि..... मुस्लिमों और सेकुलरों की बोलती बंद
हो जाए..... तथा हिन्दुओं के बच्चे-बच्चे की जुबान पर ये सच आ जाये......
जय महाकाल