Showing posts with label SONIYA GANDHI. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SONIYA GANDHI. Show all posts

Sunday, June 21, 2015

Rahul Gandhi was arrested by FBI for possession of drugs and 1.6 million unaccounted dollars.

कुछ साल पहले राहुल गांधी भी अमेरिका में १.६० लाख डॉलर और सफेद पाउडर (ड्रग्स) के साथ पकड़े गये थे। उस वक्त सोनिया गांधी ने तत्कालीन प्रधानमंत्री अटल बिहारी वाजपेयी से मदद मांगी थी। स्वामी ने कहा कि उस वक्त वाजपेयी ने राष्ट्रपति जॉर्ज बुश को संदेश भेजकर राहुल को छुडवाया था।Congress and Gandhi family were involved in anti-India activities.


http://www.hindujagruti.org/hindi/news/48047.html
Viswa Bandhu exposing Rahul Gandhi-
Drug addiction of Rahul Gandhi exposed-


Thursday, May 14, 2015

How congress kept India underdeveloped for decades while China took off



India-China-Modi-Xi

Here’s a look at how things have changed:

When Li visited in 1991, per capita GDP for the two countries was practically equal. Although India’s economy is said to be growing faster than China’s at this moment, China’s has bested India for decades. Per capita GDP in China was $6,807.4 in 2013, almost six times India’s:



Tap image to zoom

China’s foreign direct investment, which was about equal with India’s as well in 1991, has far outstripped it in recent years, thanks in part to protectionist policies in India, and China’s higher GDP per capita attracting more consumer goods companies.



Tap image to zoom

Although both countries were heavily agrarian in the 1990s, industry in China has always contributed a lot more to GDP, and that has not changed. Industry here refers to mining, manufacturing, construction, electricity, water, and gas.



Tap image to zoom

China, known for its export-oriented economy saw the share of GDP contributed by exports swell substantially in the mid-2000s. But India has caught up in the last few years, because of the rapid growth in its services sector driven by information technology and financial services:



Tap image to zoom

Helping to contribute to China manufacturing and export boom were a vast improvement on transportation and connectivity in the country. That’s in part because China’s spending on infrastructure is way higher than India’s. On an average China spent 8% of its GDP in in the period from 1992 to 2011, while India only 3.9%. Here is how both countries compare to other big economies:

Infrastructure_spending_from_1992-2011-_Weighted_average_%_of_GDP_Infrastructure_spending_chartbuilder (1)
Back in 1991, India and China together accounted for half the world’s malnourished children. Since then, malnourishment in both countries has dropped but not at the same pace—India’s rates of child malnutrition are about five times as high as China’s, and still some of the worst in the world.

Three decades ago, about the same percentage of the population in both India and China lacked access to what the World Bank calls “improved sanitation facilities,” defined as flush or compost toilets, or well-built latrines. But here, too, China has shown marked improvement over India:



Tap image to zoom

One place where both countries have grown similarly fast in the past decade is telecommunications. Thanks to their huge populations, China and India are the top two countries in overall mobile subscribers. India at one point briefly overtook China in mobile subscribers, though China has pulled ahead.



Tap image to zoom




India-China-Modi-Xi

http://qz.com/398282/why-on-earth-is-narendra-modi-going-to-mongolia/
 
 अति आवश्यक है :—
.
1- रानी लक्ष्मी बाई की मौत के पीछे सिंधिया परिवार का कितना हाथ था ?
2- चन्द्र शेखर आज़ाद की मृत्यु नेहरू के घर पर गरमा गरम बहस के कुछ घंटे बाद ही क्यों हो जाती है ?
3- भगत सिंह के पहचान में मुख्य भूमिका निभाने वाले शोभा सिंह से ऐसा कांग्रेसियों का कौन सा प्रेम है जो उसके नाम पर दिल्ली में सरकारी इमारतों का नाम रखवा दिया ?
4- नेता जी सुभाष चन्द्र बोस की मौत के पीछे नेहरु की कितनी भूमिका रही ?
5- लोर्ड माउंट बेटन की बीबी से नेहरू के ऐसे कौन से रिश्ते थे जिस कारण वह अंग्रेजो की हर बात मान लेते थे और भारत माता के दो टुकड़े करने के लिए राज़ी हो गए ?
6- सरदार पटेल जैसे महान नेता को नेपथ्य में धकेलने में नेहरू का कितना हाथ था ?
7- कश्मीर के मुद्दे को जान बुझकर अपने कश्मीरी रिश्तेदारों के कारण लटकाकर रखने में नेहरू की कितनी भूमिका थी ?
8- नेहरु के समय जनसंघ के महान नेता श्यामा प्रसाद के मौत के पीछे नेहरु की कितनी भूमिका रही ?
9- लाल बहादुर शास्त्री के मौत में इंदिरा गांधी का क्या योगदान था ?
10- जनसंघ के महान विचारक और प्रसिद्द दार्शनिक पंडित दीन दयाल उपाध्याय एवं श्यामा प्रसाद मुख़र्जी की मौत में इंदिरा गांधी एवं कांग्रेस की क्या भूमिका थी ?
11- संजय गांधी के मौत में इंदिरा गांधी का क्या योगदान रहा ?
12- इंदिरा गांधी के गोली मारे जाने के बाद सोनिया गांधी द्वारा उन्हें अस्पताल में ले जाने में की गयी देरी जान बूझकर थी या संयोग था,,
इसकी जांच क्यों न की जाय ?
13-भोपाल गैस त्रासदी के मुख्य अभियुक्त एंडरसन को देश से भगाने में गांधी परिवार का क्या योगदान रहा ?
14- 1984 में दंगाईयो को भड़का कर लाखों सिक्ख भाइयो को मरवाने वाला कौन है ?
15- माधव राव ऐसा कौन सा राज़ जानते थे जिसके कारण उनकी असामयिक मौत हो गयी ?
16- राजेश पायलेट की असामयिक मृत्यु के पीछे किसका हाथ हैं ?
17- क्वात्रोची के बंद खातो को चुपके से बिना देश को बताये चालू कर देने के पीछे किसका हाथ था ?
18- रोबेर्ट वाड्रा के परिवार वालो के रहस्यमय मौत की जिम्मेवारी किस पर है ?
19- सुल्तानपुर के गेस्ट हाउस में रात को शराब पीकर अपने अंग्रेज मित्रो के साथ लड़की के साथ बलात्कार करने वाला कौन है ?
20- राहुल गांधी किस नियम के अंतर्गत अवैध होते हुए भी भारत में दोहरी नागरिकता ग्रहण किये हुए है ?
21- किस हैसियत से सोनिया गाँधी भारतीय वायुसेना के विमानों में सफर करती थी ?
22- रोबर्ट वाड्रा को किस अधिकार से एअरपोर्ट चेकिंग से छूट मिली हुई थी ?
23- सोनिया गाँधी का इलाज सरकारी खजाने से क्यों कराया जाता था ,, उन्हें ऐसी कौनसी बीमारी है जिसका इलाज भारत में नहीं हो सकता ?
सच्चे हिन्दू हो तो हिन्दूस्थान के प्रत्येक नागरिक तक यह संदेश पहुंचाये और हिन्दू होने का
होने का कर्तव्य निभायें
from www.harsh80.wordpress.com
 

Thursday, May 7, 2015

साध्वी प्रज्ञा सिंह ठाकुर

===साध्वी प्रज्ञा सिंह ठाकुर को न्याय कब मिलेगा====
 साध्वी प्रज्ञा सिंह ठाकुर को बिना सबूतों के हिन्दू आतंकवादी होने के आरोप में 7 वर्ष से जेल में यातनाए दी जा रही हैं।
 -------------------- परिचय-------------
प्रज्ञा सिंह ठाकुर का जन्म मध्य प्रदेश के कछवाहाघर इलाके में ठाकुर चन्द्रपाल सिंह के घर हुआ था,ये राजावत(कुशवाहा,कछवाहा)राजपूत परिवार में जन्मी थी,इनकी आयु लगभग 38 वर्ष है,बाद में इनके अभिभावक सूरत गुजरात आकर बस गये.
आध्यात्मिक जगत की और लगातार आकर्षित होने के कारण इन्होने भौतिक जगत को अलविदा करने का निश्चय कर लिया और दिनांक 30-01-2007 को संन्यासिन हो गयी.सन्यास ग्रहण करने के बाद साध्वी प्रज्ञा ने हिंदुत्व और राष्ट्रवाद की अलख जगानी शुरू कर दी और अपनी ओजस्वी वाणी से शीघ्र ही इनका नाम सारे देश में फ़ैल गया,उस समय कांग्रेस की अध्यक्ष सोनिया गांधी जिनके इशारे पर पूरी केंद्र सरकार घूमती थी और उनके नेतृत्व की यूपीए सरकार लगातार इस्लामिक आतंकवादियों के प्रति नरम रुख अपनाए हुए थी जिसकी साध्वी प्रज्ञा ने जमकर आलोचना की...... शीघ्र ही ये आलोचना मैडम सोनिया तक पहुँच गयी और तभी से साध्वी को सबक सिखाने की रणनीति बनाई जाने लगी.……साध्वी प्रज्ञा को झूठा फसाया गया-------
साध्वी प्रज्ञा सिंह ठाकुर को मालेगांव बम विस्फोट मामले में सरकार ने तब गिरफ्तार किया था जब सरकार ने नीति के आधार पर यह निर्णय कर लिया था कि आतंकवादी गतिविधियों में कुछ हिन्दुओं की संलिप्तता दिखाना भी जरुरी है।उस बम ब्लास्ट मे उनकी मोटर साईकल वहां पाई गई थी जबकी वो मोटर साईकिल बहुत पहले ही साध्वी जी द्वारा बेची जा चुकी थी और उसकी आर सी तक उस आदमी के नाम ट्रांसफर करवा चुकी थी
अभी तक आतंकवादी गतिविधियों में जितने लोग पकड़े जा रहे थे वे सब मुस्लिम ही थे। सोनिया कांग्रेस की सरकार को उस वक्त लगता था कि यदि आतंकवादी गतिविधियों से किसी तरह कुछ हिन्दुओं को भी पकड़ लिया जाये तो सरकार मुसलमानों के तुष्टीकरण के माध्यम से उनके वोट बैंक का लाभ उठा सकती है। इस नीति के पीछे ऐसा माना जाता है कि मोटे तौर पर दिग्विजय सिंह का दिमाग काम करता था।
विद्यार्थी परिषद से प्रज्ञा ठाकुर के संबंधों को भगवा बताने में दिग्विजय सिंह जैसे लोगों को कितनी देर लगती। अब प्रश्न केवल इतना ही था कि प्रज्ञा ठाकुर को किस अपराध के अन्तर्गत गिरफ्तार किया जाये?
2006 और 2008 में महाराष्ट्र के मालेगांव में बम विस्फोट हुए थे। उनमें शामिल लोग गिरफ्तार भी हो चुके थे। लेकिन जांच एजेंसियों को तो अब सरकार द्वारा कल्पित भगवा आतंकवाद के सिध्दांत को स्थापित करना था, इसलिये कुछ अति उत्साही पुलिस वालों ने प्रज्ञा ठाकुर को भी मालेगांव के बम विस्फोट में ही लपेट दिया और अक्तूबर 2008 में उन्हें गिरफ्तार कर लिया गया। प्रज्ञा को सामान्य कानूनी सहायता भी न मिल सके इसके लिये उस पर मकोका अधिनियम की विभिन्न धाराएं आरोपित कर दी गई।इस नीच काम में महाराष्ट्र के शरद पवार जैसे नेताओं ने भी अपने विश्वस्त पुलिस अधिकारीयों के माध्यम से सोनिया का भरपूर साथ दिया …

शारीरिक व मानसिक यातनाएं------------
जेल में साध्वी को शारीरिक व मानसिक यातनाएं दी गई। उनकी केवल पिटाई ही नहीं कि गई बल्कि उन पर फब्तियां कसी गई। उन्हें जबरन अंडा और मांसाहारी भोजन खिलाया गया और पीट पीट कर पोर्न फिल्मे देखने को विवश किया गया,बेहोशी की हालत में इनके कपड़े तक बदले गए,जब साध्वी जी की माता बिमार हुई तो उनको साध्वी जी से मिलने तक नही दिया इन सत्ता धारीयो ने क्यो? क्या संविधान मे ये लिखा हुआ है कि जेल मे रहने वालो को उनकी मरणासन माता पिता से नही मिलने दिए जाना चाहिए?
डराने धमकाने का जो सिलसिला चला, उसको तो भला क्या कहा जाये?
इन अत्याचारों से जेल में ही साध्वी प्रज्ञा ठाकुर को कैंसर के रोग ने घेर लिया। प्रज्ञा ठाकुर ने जमानत के लिये एक बार फिर आवेदन दिया। वे बाहर अपना कैंसर का इलाज करवाया चाहती थीं। लेकिन सरकार ने इस बार भी उनकी जमानत का जी जान से विरोध किया। उनकी जमानत नहीं हो सकी। इसे ताज्जुब ही कहना होगा कि जिन राजनैतिक दलों ने जाने-माने आतंकवादी मौलाना मदनी को जेल से छुड़ाने के लिये केरल विधानसभा में बाकायदा एक प्रस्ताव पारित कर अपने पंथ निरपेक्ष होने का राजनैतिक लाभ उठाने का घटिया प्रयास किया वही राजनैतिक दल साध्वी प्रज्ञा सिंह ठाकुर को फांसी पर लटका देने के लिये दिल्ली के जंतर-मंतर पर धरना प्रदर्शन करते हैं।यहाँ तक कि एक बार कोर्ट को भी कहना पड़ा कि क्या सरकार साध्वी को जिन्दा भी देखना चाहती है या नहीं???????????
सोनिया कांग्रेस का षडयंत्र--------
लेकिन एक दिक्कत अभी भी बाकी थी। एक ही अपराध और एक ही घटना। उसके लिये पुलिस ने दो अलग-अलग केस तैयार कर लिये। एक साथ ही दो अलग-अलग समूहों को दोषी ठहरा दिया। पुलिस की इस हरकत से विस्फोट में संलिप्तता का आरोप भुगत रहे तथाकथित आतंकवादियों को बचाव का एक ठेस रास्ता उपलब्ध हो गया। इन विस्फोटों के लिये पकड़े गये मुस्लिम युवकों ने अदालत में जमानत की अर्जी लगा दी।पुलिस की जांच यह कहती है कि इन विस्फोटों के लिये मुसलमान दोषी हैं तो प्रज्ञा ठाकुर को क्यों पकड़ा हुआ है? लेकिन जेल में बन्द मुसलमानों ने तो यही तर्क दिया कि पुलिस ने स्वयं स्वीकार कर लिया है कि मालेगांव विस्फोट के लिये प्रज्ञा और उनके साथी जिम्मेदार हैं, इसलिये उन्हें कम जमानत पर छोड़ दिया जाय।
लेकिन पुलिस तो जानती थी कि प्रज्ञा ठाकुर की गिरफ्तारी तो मात्र सोनिया कांग्रेस के दिग्विजय सिंह बिग्रेड की राजनीतिक पहल रंग भरने के मात्र के लिए उसका माले गांव के विस्फोट से लेना देना नहीं है। इसलिए पुलिस ने इन मुस्लिम आतंकवादियों की जमानत की अर्जी का डट कर विरोध किया। विधि के जानकार लोगों को तभी ज्ञात हो गया था कि सोनिया कांग्रेस के मुस्लिम तुष्टीकरण के अभियान को पूरा करने के लिये साध्वी प्रज्ञा ठाकुर की बलि चढ़ाई जा रही है।उसका बम विस्फोट से कुछ लेना देना नहीं है।
प्रज्ञा सिंह ठाकुर को बिना किसी अपराध के भी जेल में पड़े हुये लगभग छह साल हो गए हैं। प्रश्न है कि बिना मुकदमा चलाये हुये किसी हिन्दू स्त्री को, केवल इसलिये कि मुसलमान खुश हो जायेंगे, भला कितनी देर जेल में बंद रखा जा सकता है? पुलिस अपनी तोता-बिल्ली की कहानी को और कितना लम्बा खींच सकती है? लेकिन ताज्जुब है अब पुलिस ने जब देखा कि प्रज्ञा सिंह के खिलाफ और किसी भी अपराध में कोई सबूत नहीं मिला तो उसने सुनील जोशी की हत्या के मामले में प्रज्ञा सिंह ठाकुर को जोड़ना शुरू कर दिया।
साध्वी प्रज्ञा ठाकुर को जेल में पड़े हुये छह साल पूरे हो गये हैं। राष्ट्रीय जांच एजेंसी उस पर कोई केस नहीं बना सकी। उसके खिलाफ तमाम हथकंडे इस्तेमाल करने के बावजूद कोई प्रमाण नहीं जुटा सकी। एक स्टेज पर तो राष्ट्रीय जांच एजेंसी को कहना ही पड़ा कि साध्वी के खिलाफ पर्याप्त सबूत न होने के कारण इन पर लगे आरोप निरस्त कर देने चाहिये। यदि सही प्रकार से कहा जाये तो प्रज्ञा ठाकुर का केस अभी प्रारंभ ही नहीं हुआ है। पर सरकार उसकी जमानत की अर्जी का डट कर विरोध करती है।
किस्सा यह है कि जांच एजेंसियों ने उस वक्त सोनिया कांग्रेस को खुश करने के लिये और राष्ट्रीय स्वयंसेवक संघ को बदनाम करने के लिए प्रज्ञा सिंह ठाकुर को पकड़ लिया और अपनी कारगुजारी दिखाने के लिये उसके इर्द-गिर्द कपोल कल्पित कथाओं का ताना-बाना भी बुन लिया। पुलिस अपने आप को निर्दोष सिध्द करने के लिये अभी भी प्रज्ञा सिंह के इर्द गिर्द झूठ का ताना-बाना बुनती ही जा रही है। कैंसर की मरीज प्रज्ञा ठाकुर क्या दिग्विजय सिंह,मैडम सोनिया के बुने हुये फरेब के इस जाल से निकल पायेगी या उसी में उलझी रह कर दम तोड़ देगी?
इस प्रश्न का उत्तर तो भविष्य ही देगा, लेकिन एक साध्वी के साथ किये इस जुल्म की जिम्मेदारी तो आखिर किसी न किसी को लेनी ही होगी।
मोदी सरकार की उदासीनता----------
जब मोदी सरकार आई तो सबको लगा क़ि चलो अब हिंदुत्ववादी सरकार आई है तो साध्वी जी को न्याय मिलेगा और उन्हें फ़साने वालो को कड़ा दंड मिलेगा,मगर हाय दुर्भाग्य,मोदी जी भी साध्वी को न्याय नही मिल पाया है,
अब जाकर सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने उनकी जमानत याचिका पर सुनवाई करते हुए कहा है कि साध्वी के खिलाफ कोई भी आरोप सिद्ध नही होता,पर तभी केंद्र सरकार के अधीन एनआईए ने फिर जमानत का विरोध कर दिया,और तब सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने भी इनकी याचिका ख़ारिज कर दी और इन्हे निचली कोर्ट में अपील करने को कहा.……
साध्वी जी कैंसर जैसी बिमारी से जूझ रही है और उन्होने इस कथित हिन्दुवा सरकार को पत्र लिखकर उन पर जेल मे हो रहे अत्याचारो को लिखित मे पीएम तक पहुंचाया कि कैसे जेल मे उनको पुलिस वाले जबरदस्ती उनके मुंह मे मांस ठूसते है और कैसे वो उनके कपडे भी सार्वजनिकता से बदलते है उनको गंदा पानी पीने पर मजबूर करते है जबकी उन्होने कोई अपराध तक भी नही किया?तब भी मोदी सरकार ने उनकी कोई मदद नही की.…

पर ये सच है कि इस देश मे राजपूतो को सिर्फ राजनीती मे एक ट्रंप कार्ड की तरह इस्तेमाल किया जाने लगा है जहां कही भी बदनामी का डर हो वहां राजपूतो को आगे कर दिया जाता है चाहे वो वी.के.सिंह जी का पाकिस्तानी दिवस मे जाना हो या कांधार मे आताकंवादीयो को छोडकर जाने के लिए जसवंंत सिंह जी हो और तो और इस देश की गंदी राजनीती ने हमारी बहन साध्वी प्रज्ञा ठाकुर जी को भी नही बख्शा ,
चुनाव से पहले बीजेपी ने वही अपना हिन्दुत्व का राग गाया और साध्वीप्रज्ञा जी पर जेल मे हो रहे अत्याचारो को बखान करके लोगो की भावनाए ऐसे जगाई जैसे की इनकी सरकार बनते ही दूसरे दिन साध्वी जी को जेल से रिहा करके उचित सम्मान दिया जाएगा मगर अफसोस फिर से सरकार ने धोखा ही दिया जैसे पहले से ही हमारे साथ होता आया है,जब सरकार को पता है कि मालेगांव बम बलास्ट मे साध्वी जी निर्दोष है तो क्यो उनको अभी तक बाहर नही निकाला गया? चलो पहले तो बीजेपी के पास बहाना था कि महाराष्ट्र मे उनकी सरकार नही है पर अब तो वहां इन कथित ठेकेदारो की ही सरकार है तो क्यो ये बाहर नही निकाल रहे ?
इसका कारण ये है कि ये सरकार हमेशा हिन्दुओ की धार्मिक भावनाओ को ढाल बनाकर सत्ता मे आती है पहले इन्होने राम मंदिर का मुद्दा उठाकर हिन्दुओ की वोटो को लूटा और सरकार बनाई क्या इन्होने राम मंदिर बनाया था?
मोदी की एनआईए ने प्रज्ञा ठाकुर की जमानत का विरोध किया और वहीँ बीजेपी अध्यक्ष और अमित शाह को क्लीन चिट देने में देर नही लगाइ.कोर्ट से हर दो महीने बाद संजय दत्त को पैरोल मिल जाती है,सलमान खान को आज  सजा मिल पाई.…
way-for-bail-for-most-of-the-accused-in-2008-malegaon-blasts-case

Sunday, November 9, 2014

GODHRA RIOTS-CONGRESS MASTERMINDED TO ISOLATE BJP FAILED DISASTROUSLY -NICOLE ELFI



Godhra Junction

Nicole ElfiA study of the masterminds behind the Godhra riots

In May this year, the people of India chose their Prime Minister. Over twelve years, several inquiry commissions — the Tewatia Committee (2010), the Nanavati Commission (2008), the Special Investigation Team (2011) under the Supreme Court — cleared Narendra Modi of all charges of having masterminded or, at least, encouraged the Godhra riots.[1]
Still, his detractors — politicians and ideology-driven activists in India, the US and Europe — have continued to label him “merchant of death”, “butcher”, “Nazi”, “fascist”, “murderer”, etc. Let us examine the facts and see whether they can point to the riot’s real mastermind.

Haji BilalThe Role of Congress Members

On 27 February 2002, when a coach of Hindu pilgrims returning from Ayodhya went up in flames at Godhra railway station, a Congress member of the Godhra municipality, Haji Balal, led a mob and stopped the fire-fighting vehicle on its way to the station. The fire crew reported that “he had been visiting the fire station at night for the past few days on the pretext of watching films on television.” Haji Balal, a few days earlier, had the clutch plates of one of the main fire-fighting vehicles removed; in the second vehicle, the nut connecting the pipe to the water tank was spirited away.[2]
Haji Balal who, according to locals, proudly proclaimed himself the “Bin Laden of Godhra”, is among eleven people convicted for criminal conspiracy and murder and sentenced to death by a special fast track court in the high-security Sabarmati Central Jail in Ahmedabad on 22 February 2011.[3]
Other Congress members were also “booked for the carnage”.[4] The attack on the pilgrims was carried out “according to what was planned earlier under the directions of [the late] Maulvi Umarji”,[5] a religious leader of the Ghanchi Muslims of Godhra.[6] “All the acts like procuring petrol, circulating false rumour, stopping the train and entering in coach S/6 were in pursuance of the object of the conspiracy,” concluded the Nanavati Report. “The conspiracy hatched by these persons further appears to be a part of a larger conspiracy to create terror and destabilise the Administration.”[7]
“Destabilise the Administration”: Narendra Modi had assumed office as Gujarat Chief Minister on 7 October 2001, four months earlier. Incidentally, Maulvi Umarji got a ticket to campaign for the Congress in December 2002 state election in Gujarat.
In order to quickly gather a crowd of angry Muslims to the Godhra station and attack the train, so that no one would guess who was pouring petrol in the S6 and S7 coaches, rumours that a Ghanchi Muslim girl had been abducted by the Kar Sevaks were spread by the Jamiat-Ulema-E-Hind (JUH), a long-standing ally of the Congress.[8]
Narendra ModiFrom the start of the crisis, Narendra Modi appealed to the people to remain calm and exert self-control. On five occasions between 27 and 28 February, “CM addressed Media, Assembly and General public and everywhere the genesis and intention was one and the same, to punish the culprits responsible for the Godhra incident in an exemplary manner, so that it did not recur ever again.”[9] He announced an ex-gratia payment of 200,000 rupees to the next of kin of those killed in the Godhra incident and ordered a high-level inquiry into the incident.[10]
On 1st March, less than two days after the tragedy and while riots were raging, Modi requested the chief secretaries of neighbouring states of Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and Rajasthan to send ten companies of armed police from each state to assist the government in “handling law and order situation”. As the sociologist and author Madhu Kishwar points out,[11] all three states then had Congress governments, and all three turned down the request.

Teesta Sitalwad & Javed AnandThe Campaign

Let us recall that the BJP-led NDA alliance had been in power at the Centre since 1998, confirmed by fresh elections in 1999. A 15-million-rupee campaign by journalist-activist Teesta Setalvad and her husband Javed Anand, funded by the Congress Party and Communists to “politically isolate the BJP”,[12] failed to convince the Indian people, who voted the BJP to power. And the crusaders had to swallow the obvious — that the streets of India remained peaceful during the NDA regime.[13]
They however found a fertile ground in the US, especially with the evangelical lobbies.[14] On 1st April 2002 Teesta Setalvad created “Citizens for Justice and Peace” (CJP), an NGO “outsourced by the Congress to the job of attacking Modi”, as Madhu Kishwar put it.[15] The activists approached the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF), a U.S. government-funded body, with known roots in the evangelical movement, whose “original intention was to protect Christians around the world … to review facts and circumstances of violations of religious freedom internationally — and to make policy recommendations to the President, Secretary of State, and the Congress”.[16] Testifying before the USCIRF, Teesta Setalvad alleged that the BJP had conducted: 
successful pogroms and attacks against the countries religious minorities, … recent state-sponsored Genocide of the Muslim Community in Gujarat … Brutal destruction of life, through rape, quartering of bodies, urinating on them and incarcerating [sic] them so that there is no trace or evidence of their remains … desecrating over 270 religious and cultural shrines belonging to the community … through systematic planning and targeted action by armed militias ideologically driven by the vision of a supreme and exclusive Hindu rashtra (state). … Over 2,000 lost their lives, 500 are missing and 250-300 girls and women were gang-raped before being quartered, burned and killed.[17]
This “testimony” from India is what fed countless self-styled human rights organizations and intellectuals in India and in the West. They drank in Setalvad’s words and regurgitated them as articles and “reports” with a plethora of gory details.
As regards the number of riot victims, invariably quoted in thousands, the then Police Commissioner P.C. Pande, in a statement to the Special Investigating Team, declared, 
… it was incorrect to say that 1000 people lost their lives in Ahmedabad City during the riots of 2002, whereas the actual number of deaths between February 28th 2002 and April 30th 2002 was 442, of whom 113 were Hindus and 329 Muslims. … All offences committed were duly and properly registered including by sending police officers to relief camps and therefore, no important crime remained unregistered.[18]
According to the Congress-led UPA government’s statement in Parliament on 11 May 2005, the final figures of those killed in the Godhra riots are 790 Muslims and 254 Hindus.[19] In any case, the endlessly repeated figure of “2000 Muslim victims” has no basis in actual fact.

Sanjiv Bhatt IPSThe SIT and Sanjeev Bhatt

Facts cannot so easily be wished away. And they were nailed by the Nanavati Report and the Supreme Court-appointed Special Investigation Team (SIT), headed by former Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) chief R.K. Raghavan in response to a petition filed by Jakia Nasim, Ehsan Jafri’s[20] widow, and Teesta Setalvad, which alleged criminal conspiracy by Narendra Modi’s government.[21] Jakia Nasim’s testimony before the Nanavati Commission and Supreme Court in 2002 and 2003 was that “the mob would have lynched all of them but for the
timely action by the police”. Four years later, her praise turned into complaint — except that the poor lady was not even aware of what she complained or petitioned about: “She has no personal knowledge of the allegations mentioned in the affidavits filed by R.B. Sreekumar during the years 2002, 2004 and 2005 on his own”, said the SIT.[22]
Let us explain: The SIT, appointed on 23 March 2008, investigated two retired Indian Police Service (IPS) officers, one of them being R.B. Sreekumar just mentioned, to whom we will shortly return. The second one, Sanjeev Bhatt, then Deputy Commissioner of Intelligence in the Gujarat government, claimed after years of silence that he was present at a law and order meeting convened
by the Chief Minister on 27 February night at his residence. At this meeting, which lasted 15-20 minutes, Sanjeev Bhatt claims that the Chief Minister said that “for too long the Gujarat police had been following the approach of balancing the action against Hindus and Muslims … that the situation warranted that the Muslims be taught a lesson, … it was imperative that Hindus
be allowed to vent out their anger….”[23]
As it turned out, none of the officials present even remembered the presence of Sanjeev Bhatt. Interrogated independently later, they denied any such talk by the Chief Minister, who, they asserted, said instead that the Godhra flare-up was very unfortunate and should be handled with a firm hand. The discussions centred around maintenance of law and order in view of the call for a bandh on the next day and the availability of forces. Ahmedabad Police Commissioner P.C. Pandey categorically stated that no instructions to allow any freedom to law-breakers were given by the Chief Minister. According to Prakash S. Shah, then Additional Secretary (Law & Order), the Chief Minister instructed all the officers that “communal peace and harmony be maintained at all costs and all possible steps be taken to control the possible communal flare-up.”[24] 
As for Sanjeev Bhatt’s testimony, the SIT called fax messages produced by him “not genuine”, “forged document, fabricated subsequently by someone with a vested interest.”[25] “This conduct of Shri Sanjiv [sic] Bhatt in arranging, prompting and controlling the witness [a witness produced by him] to corroborate his statement is highly suspicious and undesirable.”[26] And from the location of his mobile phone, his claim of being present at the said meeting at the Chief Minister’s residence proved to be false. “Shri Sanjiv Bhatt is a tainted witness and therefore, cannot be relied upon keeping in view his background in the police department as he was involved in criminal cases of serious nature and departmental inquiries are also in progress against him.”[27] Cases against him included inflicting torture in custody leading to death, abduction, extortion and unprovoked firing, killings and planting narcotics with a view to blackmail. SIT head R.K. Raghavan concluded that Bhatt had lied and brought in tutored witnesses to falsely implicate Modi.[28] The Gujarat Vigilance Commission recommended his suspension twice (on 15-07-2002 and 19-10-2006) for professional misconduct, but each time he managed to evade prosecution.[29] 
A last brush stroke on Sanjeev Bhatt’s erratic comportment is given by senior lawyer Ram Jethmalani in a Sunday Guardian article. The man “handed over charge and his official computer, leaving all his emails in an unprotected mode for all to read”… The state government forwarded the material to the SIT for investigations, and thanks to this irresponsible gesture, authorities harvested details of his “hobnobbing with the Opposition Congress party in a thoroughly illegal and almost seditious manner to concoct evidence against the Chief Minister and the state of Gujarat”. To this end Bhatt was in constant touch with top Congress party leaders, from whom he received not only guidance, but “packages” and “materials”, as per his own statement.[30]

Teesta SetalvadAn Activist’s Career

Activist Teesta Setalvad built a successful career on the Godhra issue and on demonizing Narendra Modi, for which she has been covered with national and international awards. Let us mention just a few: 
• In August 2002, the Rajiv Gandhi National Sadbhavana [Communal Harmony] Award instituted by the Congress (I), jointly with Harsh Mander (former IAS officer and NAC board member),[31] “for their outstanding contribution towards communal harmony and national integration”. 
• In 2003, the Nuremberg International Human Rights Award (jointly with Ibn Abdur Rehman, a Pakistani “peace and human-rights advocate and veteran communist from Pakistan”).[32] 
• The New York-based Parliamentarians for Global Action’s 2004 Defenders’ of Democracy Award, for her efforts “to ensure justice for the victims of the genocide in Gujarat. 
• In 2006, the Nani Palkhivala Award. In her acceptance speech, Setalvad was all praise for an IPS officer to whom she dedicates her award, someone “who stood mighty in the face of a murderous and vindictive Gujarat administration.”[33] 
• In 2007, the Padma Shri Award from the Government of India, which since May 2004 had been run by a Congress-led coalition. – Scribd, 2014

» This is a postscript to The Godhra Riots: Sifting Fact from Fiction, by the same author

» Read the second part of this article, the ISRO Spy Scandal  story, on Scribd here 

» Nicole Elfi is a French author who lives in Auroville. This article ©Nicole Elfi, 2014

 Notes & References

  1. From Commission of Inquiry Report of Justice G.T. Nanavati & Justice A.H. Mehta (henceforth “Nanavati Report”), p. 175: 229. The report is available on the website of the Gujarat government:http://home.gujarat.gov.in/homedepartment/downloads/godharaincident.pdf(accessed May 2014).
  2. From Justice Tewatia Committee Report, short for Gujarat Riots: The True Story; Facts Speak for Themselves – Godhra and After, A Field Study by Justice D. S. Tewatia, Dr. J.C. Batra, Dr. Krishan Singh Arya, Shri Jawahar Lal Kaul, Prof. B.K. Kuthiala. Council for International Affairs and Human Rights, Governing Body for the Term 2001-03. See “Staff of the Fire Brigade”. Online at: www.gujaratriots.com/index.php/2010/04/justice-tewatia-committee-report/ (retrieved June 2014). Also Nanavati Report, p. 86, 88, 89: 128, 130-131.
  3. Dasgupta, M. 2011. “11 get death in Godhra train burning case”, online at:www.thehindu.com/news/national/11-get-death-in-godhra-train-burning-case/article1500325.ece (retrieved July 2014).
  4. Among them, President of the District Congress Committee, Farooq Malla and Congress activist of Godhra Municipality, Abdul Rehman Dhatia. Tewatia Report, “Fifty-Eight Pilgrims Roasted Alive”.
  5. Nanavati Report, p. 159-160: 214; p. 175.
  6. Gujarat’s minister of state for home Amit Shah’s interview by Sheela Bhatt, 27.02.2003, online at: www.rediff.com/news/2003/feb/27inter.htm (retrieved June 2014).
  7. Nanavati Report, p. 175: 229.
  8. Nanavati Report, pp 40-41: 51-52, p. 49: 68; pp. 158-159: 213.
  9. Special Investigation Team (SIT) Report, p. 241. The Supreme Court handed over all records pertaining to 2002 riots to SIT on 20.01.2010; SIT submitted its final report on Modi’s role in 2002 Gujarat riots, on 25.04.2011.
  10. SIT p. 21.
  11. Kishwar, M.P. 2013. “Modinama 7, When Congress State Governments Snubbed Modi’s Request for Additional Police Force”, online at:manushi.in/articles.php?articleId=1704 (retrieved May 2014).
  12. Wikipedia, Communalism Combat:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communalism_Combat . “In a 1999 interview, Javed Anand said that before the 1999 Lok Sabha elections, his monthly magazine Communalism Combat (published by Sabrang Communications since August 1993) requested and received funds from the Congress Party, Communist Party of India (Marxist) and the Communist Party of India and ten individuals to run advertisements attacking the Sangh Parivar and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)”.
  13. See Elst, K. & Rao, R.N. 2002. Gujarat after Godhra: Real Violence, Selective Outrage, Har-Anand, Delhi.
  14. See Balakrishna, S. 2014. “Narendra Modi’s visa denial still an unhealed wound” online at: indiafacts.co.in/narendra-modis-visa-denial-still-an-unhealed-wound/? (retrieved May 2014).
  15. Kishwar, M.P. 2013. “Modinama” 13, “RB Shreekumar: Hero No. 2 of Secular Brigade” – Part I, online at: manushi.in/articles.php?articleId=1730(retrieved May 2014).
  16. The United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Commission_on_International_Religious_Freedom(retrieved May 2014).
  17. Teesta Setalvad’s testimony to the USCIRF, online at:http://web.archive.org/web/20070713194116/www.uscirf.gov/events/hearings/2002/june/0 6102002_setalvaTestimony.html (retrieved June 2014)
  18.  SIT pp. 92-93.
  19. See “Gujarat Riots: the true story”, online at:www.gujaratriots.com/index.php/2008/05/myth-1-2000-muslims-were-killed-in-the-gujarat-riots/ (retrieved July 2014). Narendra Modi’s interview for Seedhi Baat/Aaj Tak, in India Today, 04.11.2002, online at:www.indiatoday.com/itoday/20021104/conf.shtml#co (retrieved July 2014).
  20. About Ehsan Jafri see Elfi, N. 2013. “The Godhra Riots: Sifting Facts from Fiction”, online at: scribd.com/doc/174541552/The-Godhra-Riots-Sifting-Fact-from-Fiction-Nicole-Elfi .
  21. SIT pp. 16, 18-19.
  22. SIT p. 16.
  23. SIT pp. 22-25.
  24. SIT pp. 25-27, 34, 522.
  25. SIT pp. 523-530.
  26. SIT p. 41.
  27. SIT p. 241.
  28. SIT pp. 540-41. Also Dasgupta, M. 2012. “SIT rejects amicus curiae’s observations against Modi”, online at:thehindu.com/news/national/article3401728.ece (retrieved June 2014).
  29. SIT pp. 48-51. Kishwar, M.P. 2013. “Modinama 6, Heroes of the Secular Brigade: A Glimpse into the Doings and Misdoings of Sanjiv Bhatt”, online at: http://manushi.in/articles.php?articleId=1703&ptype=campaigns(retrieved July 2014).
  30. Jethmalani, R. 2011. “UPA, media have a brazen mission to demonize Modi”, online at: sunday-guardian.com/analysis/upa-media-have-a-brazen-mission-to-demonize-modi (retrieved July 2014). Also Kishwar 2013: 6, op. cit.
  31. The National Advisory Council (2004-2014) was a body set up by the first UPA government to advise the Prime Minister of India. Sonia Gandhi served as its Chairperson from its inception to its end.
  32. Nuremberg International Human Rights Award, online at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_International_Human_Rights_Award
  33. Teesta Setalvad “Nani A Palkhivala Award 2006 Acceptance Speech”, online at: www.countercurrents.org/comm-setalvad100207.htm (retrieved June 2014).

Tuesday, October 21, 2014

SONIYA GANDHI'S LOVE STORY

Sonia Gandhi's First Love affair!

This is a Love Story that the Indians may not know about Antonia Maino called Sonia Gandhi! No one has ever published this in India!  This had happened before Antonia Maino ever met Rajiv Gandhi in England!

This is an interview to Franco Luison, published on an Italian Weekly 'GENTE' of his four years of love story with Antonia Maino before her departure to England in 1964 where she met  Rajive Gandhi.
We own a copy of this issue and translate it for you!
Franco Luison 
He was an Italian football player of 'Serie A'
My love affair with Antonia Maino 
"We were in love and happy everywhere"
Our family were very happy and eager to know that we were in love. Her parents used to accommodate me with great pleasure at their home of Orbassano near Turin where they were transferred in the 60's.

She loved me and wanted to marry me, not the son of Indira Gandhi. I was famous then not Sonia!

We met for the first time at the see shore of Jesolo in the 60's, when she was 14 and I was 26.  We met for the first time under the shade of my beach umbrella at Jesolo, then I was famous, not Sonia! It seemed like a summer flirt for the first time but lasted for four years and our respective families were happy to see us together. Every sunday, after match, I used to go to Orbasano to Antonia.  Her family always received me with great pleasure and courtesy.   Will remain with her until tuesday, before return for the practice.
Antonia with Franco
Lusiana,1964
I was the first great lover of Antonia. Our love story lasted for 4 years. She wanted me to promise her to marry, but I use to postponed each time. Then she went to England where she met Rajiv Gandhi.

In 1964 she made a decision to go to England. Though I wasn't happy, she made her trip. She narrated me in her letters everything she was doing. Once she came back for vacation and spoke of Rajive, son of Indira Gandhiand "I'm invited to meet his mother and will be going to Delhi soon", she added. When she came back from New Delhi, she was convinced that will marriage Rajive Gandhi.
Though it hurt me very much, farewell to our four years relation wasn't very tragic and our goodbye was in a very gentle manner.

He still keeps his friendship with her family, and meets them at-least twice an year to exchange gifts during feasts. Nora, wife of Franco remember: "I was jealous of Sonia, for all his friends use to speak about her when I started our relation in the late 1964. "I was afraid one day Sonia would come back and I will loose Franco!" she added.
Observations:
So, Rajive Gandhi was her 'second' love at first sight!
- None of her biographies speak of Mr. Franco Luison!?
- Those four years of story is erased from her life! 


****************************************************
References

Franco Luison (15July 1934 - 25 September 2012)
link
News
Luison the cat

Antonia Maino (Sonia Gandhi ) -  9 December 1946
Born at Lusianaa small town in the province of Vicenza,  Veneto,  Italylater transferred to Orbassano  in the Province of Turin, Piedmont region Italy. While studying English at a language school in Cambridge, England, she met Rajiv GandhiThe couple married in 1968 and knows as Sonia Gandhi.
Lusiana
Lusiana 
The twist tutor 
News 
Encyclopaedia Britannica 
Love at first sight
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonia_Gandhi
http://www.notablebiographies.com/news/Ca-Ge/Gandhi-Sonia.html
http://www.elections.in/political-leaders/sonia-gandhi.html

Monday, May 12, 2014

SONIYA /RAHUL/VADRA ARE GAZANVI OF MODERN INDIA- SHOULD NOT BE GIVEN FREE PASS BY MODI.

Modi SelfieThe story of Prithviraj Chauhan and Muhammad Ghori has a strong relevance today,as Atal Ji has not started any anticorruption activity against SONIYA GANDHI AND FAMILY ,which was wrong because when people vote to change,they definitely wanta ction against those powers which have misused and created mess in India, Raped mother India,almost certainly wanted ROME EMPIRE in India by crushing Hindus as also said by Wikileaks- LINK
Certainly Sonia Gandhi should be punished as its still about truth and Dharma. AND ALL CITIZENS ARE EQUAL AND SONIYA MUST BE PUNISHED,VADRA MUST BE PUNISHED LIKE ALL CITIZENS IF THEY DO WRONG.NO MERCY.IF SHE GETS MERCY ALL CITIZENS WILL GET MERCY AND NEXT ELECTION WILL BE CONGRESS AGAIN. A ASK MODI JI NOT TO BECOME PRITHVIRAJ CHOUHAN AND GET ROMAN EMPIRE OR ISLAMIC EMPIRA BACK. BECOME SHIVA JI, BECOME CHATRSAL JI AND FINISH ALL TRAITORS PER RULES AND REGULATIONS OF LAW OF LAND. DHARMA SHOULD PREVAIL.
Ghori’s obsession was India, which he attacked savagely many times, though he was first routed in present day Gujarat by Rajputs and again in Kayadara near Mount Abu, in 1178 A.D. where again he was resoundingly defeated.
He then decided to enter India through a different route and first encountered Prithviraj Chauhan at the battle of Taraori in 1191. Prithviraj’s cavalry charged and routed the Muslim cavalry and captured Ghori. ​Modi
Ghori begged for his life and Prithviraj allowed him to go, despite his generals begging him not to do so.
And surely enough, the following year Ghori came back. Prithviraj advanced with his army and sent a letter to Ghori, asking him to turn back as he had been defeated the previous year and was spared his life.
Ghori replied that he was in India on the orders of his brother, Ghiasuddin, and that he could only retreat after he got a word from his brother.
This letter was sent in the evening and after sending the letter Ghori moved his camp back a few kilometers to feign retreat. On receiving this letter and seeing Muhammad move his camp back Prithviraj assumed that Ghori got the message and was retreating.
But Ghori knew that Rajputs did not fight in the night but only after sun had come up. Thus, Ghori treacherously attacked in the early morning hours when Prithviraj and his army were sleeping and was able to win this one battle.
Prithviraj was captured, beaten up and taken in chains to Ghor in Afghanistan There, he was presented before Ghori and he fearlessly looked straight into his captor’s eyes.

Ghori ordered him to lower his eyes. A defiant Prithviraj scornfully told him how he had treated well Ghori as a prisoner and that the eyelids of a Rajputs eyes are lowered only in death. On hearing this, Ghori flew into a rage and ordered that Prithviraj's eyes be burnt with red hot iron rods.
Prithviraj was regularly brought to the court to be taunted by Ghori and his courtiers and ultimately put to death. Thus ended the story of the brave but unrealistic Prithviraj Chouhan.

Will MODI government, like Prithviraj Chauhan, forgive Sonia Gandhi, who has been mercilessly going after him for the last ten years, using shamelessly and ruthlessly the arms of the law - the CBI, the IB, the judiciary, compliant judges, the Election Commission, etc. ?Mr Vajpayee did it before him. He came to power and could have done anything he wanted, but he gave orders that Sonia Gandhi be left alone.
His Man Friday, Brajesh Mishra, is even said to have rescued Rahul Gandhi, when he was detained in Boston. Did it earn Sonia Gandhi’s gratitude? Not at all! The BJP lost the next elections, as Prithrivaj lost his next battle to Ghauri and Mrs Gandhi efficiently and ruthlessly went all out after the BJP and Narendra Modi.
This is not about good or bad, as in the American cartoons. THIS IS DHARMA AND KARMA PRINCIPAL AND ALL CITIZENS SHOULD BE TREATED EQUALLY.

LINK TO MY OTHER ARTICLE-CLICK HERE,NGO ARE CHRISTIANIZING INDIA,ANTI-INDIA ACTIVITY
SWISS ACCOUNT-DETAILS- swiss-documents-rajiv-gandhi,SONIYA GANDHI

FROM-Francois Gautier

Sunday, May 4, 2014

VATICAN TRYING TO CONTROL HINDUS VIA ISLAMIST AGENDA-WIKILEAKS

VATICAN IS TRYING TO CONTROL HINDUS.






Narendra Modi
" Narasimha Rao devoted his entire life to the Congress but this mother and son (Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi) were not happy when he became prime minister. You may not have heard them taking his name. This mother and son harassed him even after he ceased to be prime minister "
Jan-01,1970
Rajnath Singh
" Congress vice-president Rahul Gandhi said RSS got Mahatma Gandhi killed. I want to ask Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi, try to read the pages of history. Ban on RSS was lifted six months after imposition by the Congress government after it accepted that the allegations against RSS were baseless "



download wikileaks for india-
http://www.stafaband.info/download/mp3/lagu_vatican_is_trying_to_control_hindus_in_india_wikil/

Reuters- -gandhis
Rahul Gandhi, seen as an India prime minister in waiting, told the U.S. ambassador radical Hindu groups could posed a bigger threat to the country than the Islamists who attacked Mumbai in 2008, a leaked cable showed. The comments made to Timothy Roemer last year were immediately criticised by the main opposition Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), adding to political sparring that has deadlocked parliament and pushed policymaking into limbo.
Gandhi’s comments, made in response to a question from Roemers on the Pakistani-basedLashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) militant group, referred to religious tension created by more extreme BJP leaders, according to the cable dated August 3, 2009. It was released by WikiLeaks andpublished on Friday by Britain’s Guardian newspaper.
Gandhi said there was evidence of some support for the LeT among Indian Muslims, the ambassador wrote, according to the cable.  “However, Gandhi warned, the bigger threat may be the growth of radicalised Hindu groups, which create religious tensions and political confrontations with the Muslim community,” Roemer wrote. The ambassador added a comment that “Gandhi was referring to the tensions created by some of the more polarizing figures in the BJP such as Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi.”
Gandhi, son of Congress chief Sonia Gandhi, has sparked the BJP’s ire before. He once compared the opposition party’s parent organisation to the banned Students Islamic Movement of India. On Friday, the BJP said Gandhi’s comments were adding grist to propaganda from Islamist militants and Pakistan.
READ MORE--
http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/tag/wikileaks/

Saturday, May 3, 2014

Chief Election Commissioner appointed by SONIYA GANDHI and his Irregularities


 Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) appointed by SONIYA GANDHI and  various irregularities -
(1) People found immensely slow response to their change requests for voting constituencies or even new voter Id cards
Why Narendra Modi disallowed & Rahul allowed  rally in Varanasi. EC has given very bland reason to disallow  Narendra Modi from campaigning in his own Constituency . If there is a serious security threat, then Rahul Gandhi too should not be allowed. 
- BJP leader  Dr. Subramanian Swamy.
-----------------------------------------
Arun Jaitley on Varanasi rally: 
I cannot conceal my disappointment with the Election Commission. Men in constitutional offices need to be bolder. Timid men can dwarf high offices. The Election Commission scrutinises us all the time. They are extremely vigilant in tackling the side shows in the elections. They are concerned with what adjectives are used by whom. But when it comes to preventing booth capturing which has reappeared after a decade in elections 2014 they are out of their depth. By condoning the Returning Officer’s stand on ‘No-Modi rally’ in Varanasi city the Election Commission has used the security card to prevent Narendra Modi’s right to campaign in his constituency. If you can’t ensure security, don’t hold the polls in the country. But if you do hold the polls please provide a level playing field. You cannot deny the candidate the right to campaign. Rahul Gandhi can have a road show in Varanasi but Narendra Modi cannot have a rally. The security card is selectively used.
--------------------------
Read more at: http://www.firstpost.com/politics/arun-jaitley-on-varanasi-rally-biased-ec-is-pro-rahul-anti-modi-1513907.html?utm_source=ref_article
----------------------All that a person appointed as the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) has to do is, be neutral in his/her approach. When the nation goes to vote, it trusts the CEC to make sure there are no frauds.
However, in this election, thanks to our CEC Mr. VS Sampath, various irregularities have come into light:

(1) People found immensely slow response to their change requests for voting constituencies or even new voter Id cards 

(2) People went to vote but found their names missing/erased. Number in millions. (http://www.ndtv.com/elections/article/election-2014/six-million-voters-names-deleted-in-maharashtra-510991)

(3) Reports have come in about tampering with EVMs post election (http://www.tntmagazine.in/uncategorized/politicians-journalists-assaulted-by-police-in-ranchi-over-complaint-of-evm-tampering/)

(4) Some constituencies reported massive bogus voting. (http://www.theshillongtimes.com/2014/05/01/disqualify-cong-nominee-for-inner-manipur-ls-seat-cpi-to-ec/)

(5) SECURITY THREAT ! Crores of Bangladesis found to posses voter I-cards (http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/jaipur/Fake-voter-Id-cards-seized-from-Bangladeshi-infiltrators/articleshow/33973147.cms)

(6) EVMs which were doing bogus voting to congress (http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/defective-evm-transfers-votes-to-congress-in-pune-lok-sabha-polls/1/356191.html)

(7) Some congress ministers openly captured the booth but no complaint was registered (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D3u9d3Bu79M)

(8) Congress and AAP candidates openly violated election code of conduct but the only FIR registered was that against Narendra Modi. He was found not guilty later. (Congress:  https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bme5tUpCUAItdHv.png 
AAP: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=401794573293530)

All of these reports forced us to do a little research.. and voila ! .. look what we found. 
This guy VS Sampath was handpicked by Sonia in 2012. (http://archive.indianexpress.com/news/v-s-sampath-to-be-new-election-commissioner/445428/)

We rest our case.  No further comments, we shall hear your opinion instead.

Thanks for your time.
(2) People went to vote but found their names missing/erased. Number in mi
llions. http://www.ndtv.com/elections/article/election-2014/six-million-voters-names-deleted-in-maharashtra-510991)
(7) Some congress ministers openly captured the booth but no complaint was registered (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D3u9d3Bu79M)
(8) Congress and AAP candidates openly violated election code of conduct but the only FIR registered was that against Narendra Modi. He was found not guilty later. (Congress: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bme5tUpCUAItdHv.png
AAP: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=401794573293530)
All of these reports forced us to do a little research.. and voila ! .. look what we found.
This guy VS Sampath was handpicked by Sonia in 2012. (http://archive.indianexpress.com/news/v-s-sampath-to-be-new-election-commissioner/445428/)
We rest our case. No further comments, we shall hear your opinion instead.
Thanks for your time.