India's pseudo secularism- Hindus are enemy of Hindus

In April 2003, Late Jagjit Singh along with singer Abhijeet had met the then Dy PM LK Advani to demand ban on Pakistani singers performing in India.

"The Indian high commission in Pakistan invited me for the Republic Day celebrations in 1980. That was the only time I performed there. An ISI agent kept an eye on us and, after 15 days, we were told to pack up and leave. It was only when I was leaving Pakistan that I realized the man was a senior ISI officer -- everyone saluted him when he came to see me off," Singh added.

"While Pakistan-sponsored terrorists were gunning down innocents in Kashmir and carrying out massacres, Indian television channels were busy airing songs of Pakistani singers"
Singh added.
------------------------------------
Now it is upto all of us to decide whether to support Jagjit Singh or the Pakistani Singers.

Ref http://www.rediff.com/movies/2003/apr/04abhi.html

Some Celebrities crib about a Problem.
Some celebrities use a problem to get Famous
But there are people who extend a helping hand without much ado.
Good job Akshay for helping our farmers.
 




 Hindu Terror !! Hindu Terror !!
Oh wait, let us first take some efforts to know the truth.

Two days ago, there was a news all over the media that a mob killed a man from peace loving community simply because he ate beef.

Turns out, the man was actually accused of stealing a cow and calf. When villagers went to check his home, they found remains of calf. This made mob angry and they beat him by which the man died.

We do not support mob justice. But we also oppose Media trail.
Dear Prestitutes, please come prepared next time


 While the bollywood is desperate to prove that the faith of India's 70% population is 'wrong number', the real life experiences of people have a different tale to tell.
Steve jobs is said to have visited India and traveled in pursuit of spiritual guidance which he did get eventually. The guidance helped shape his vision for his company, Apple- a company that revolutionised the way world looked at personal computing.
When Mark Zuckerberg was going through difficult times in early days of his company Facebook, he visited his mentor Jobs for advice. Jobs asked him to travel to India and visit the temple he used to visit. Zuckerberg did as adviced and recently, in a conversation with PM Narendra Modi, revealed how it helped him find hie way back to his mission for his company and turn it into one of the biggest success of the silicon valley.

Going to temples is a matter of faith, those who possess it in their heart find what they go looking for. Those who are full of doubt, ego or other wrong intentions, will inevitably draw blanks.

But then, ridiculing this faith? of course.. our film industry the p-intellectuals, the leftists, the anti-indic forces are at it for decades and centuries.
As a result, it takes someone from west to come and narrate their stories, or we in India continue seeing our own roots as frivolous.
That's India we live in.

In an unexpected move, UN has chosen Saudi Arabia to head Human Rights Council Panel.
Its not only funny but also a tragic move given a fact that Saudi Arabia has arguably the worst record in the world on freedoms for women, minorities and dissidents.

For instance, women in Saudi do not have driving rights and they can not go anywhere without a male guardian. In one extreme case, a teenager reported that she had been gang-raped, but because she was not with a mahram when it occurred, she was punished by the court. The victim was given more lashes than one of her alleged rapists received.

When lakhs of Syrian refugees were seeking shelter, Saudi Arabia did not let a single one to enter their nation even though the refugees were of same faith. Saudi did however offered to build mosques for refugees in Germany.

Saudi Arabia also funds Wahabism across the world to spread Islam.
And talking about Islam, Saudi Arabia is governed by Sharia Law. A single insult to Quran can lead to death sentence. And all these are the qualities which UN saw in Saudi Arabia after which they decided to make Saudi a head of Human Rights Council Panel when Saudi itself has no Human Rights for their own people.

-----------------------------------------------------
Ref-
[1] http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/Fury-after-Saudi-Arabia-chosen-to-head-key-UN-human-rights-panel/articleshow/49044431.cms

[2] http://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/sep/28/saudi-woman-lashed-defying-driving-ban

[3] http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/21/AR2006112100967.html

[4] http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3242354/Saudi-offer-build-200-mosques-Germany-Syrian-migrants-slammed-cynical-Kingdom-not-offered-refugees-themselves.html

[5] http://www.indiatvnews.com/news/india/saudi-pumping-millions-to-promote-wahhabism-in-india-52171.html

[6] http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/man-to-be-beheaded-in-saudi-arabia-after-ripping-up-a-koran-and-hitting-it-with-his-shoe-10067392.html

GOD RAMA IN HOLLAND AND GOD GANESH IN INDONESIAN CURRENCY

India should quit being so called pseudosecular. If Indonesia could print God Ganesh in its notes, and Holland could print God RAM in its currency notes, how come India does not.

GERMANY IS CHRISTIAN THEN WHY INDIA IS NOT HINDU NATION?

When Germany is Christian, Why India is NOT Hindu ?
-------------------------------------------------------
Article by Mariawirth : May 4, 2013
-------------------------------------------------------

 Though I live in India since long, there are still some points that I find hard to understand – for example why many educated Indians become agitated when India is considered as a Hindu country. The majority of Indians are Hindus. India is special because of its ancient Hindu tra...dition. Westerners are drawn to India because of it. Why then is there this resistance by many Indians to acknowledge the Hindu roots of their country?

This attitude is strange for two reasons. First, those educated Indians seem to have a problem only with ‘Hindu’ India, but not with ‘Muslim’ or ‘Christian’ countries. In Germany for example, only 59 percent of the population are registered with the two big Christian Churches (Protestant and Catholic), however, the country is bracketed under ‘Christian countries’. Angela Merkel, the Chancellor, stressed recently the Christian roots of Germany and urged the population ‘to go back to Christian values’. In 2012, she postponed her trip to the G-8 summit for a day to address the German Catholic Day. Two major political parties carry ‘Christian’ in their name, including Angela Merkel’s ruling party.

Germans are not agitated that Germany is called a Christian country, though I actually would understand if they were. After all, the history of the Church is appalling. The so called success story of Christianity depended greatly on tyranny. “Convert or die”, were the options given not only to the indigenous population in America some five hundred years ago. In Germany, too, 1200 years ago, the emperor Karl the Great ordered the death sentence for refusal of baptism in his newly conquered realms. It provoked his advisor Alkuin to comment: ‘One can force them to baptism, but how to force them to believe?’

Those times, when one’s life was in danger if one dissented with the dogmas of the Church, are thankfully over. And nowadays many in the west do dissent and leave the Church in a steady stream – partly because they are disgusted with the less than holy behavior of Church officials and partly because they can’t believe in the dogmas, for example that ‘Jesus is the only way’ and that God sends all those who don’t accept this to hell.

And here comes the second reason why the resistance to associate India with Hinduism by Indians is difficult to understand. Hinduism is in a different category from the Abrahamic religions. Its history, compared to Christianity and Islam was undoubtedly the least violent as it spread in ancient times by convincing arguments and not by force. It is not a belief system that demands blind belief in dogmas and the suspension of one’s intelligence. On the contrary, Hinduism encourages using one’s intelligence to the hilt. It is an enquiry into truth, based on a refined (methods are given) character and intellect. It comprises a huge body of ancient literature, not only regarding Dharma and philosophy, but also regarding music, architecture, dance, science, astronomy, economics, politics, etc. If Germany or any other western country had this kind of literary treasure, it would be so proud and highlight its greatness on every occasion. When I discovered for example the Upanishads, I was stunned. Here was expressed in clear terms what I intuitively had felt to be true, but could not have expressed clearly. Brahman is not partial; it is the invisible, indivisible essence in everything. Everyone gets again and again a chance to discover the ultimate truth and is free to choose his way back to it. Helpful hints are given but not imposed.

In my early days in India, I thought that every Indian knew and valued his tradition. Slowly I realized that I was wrong. The British colonial masters had been successful in not only weaning away many of the elite from their ancient tradition but even making them despise it. It helped that the ‘educated’ class could no longer read the original Sanskrit texts and believed what the British told them. This lack of knowledge and the brainwashing by the British education may be the reason why many ‘modern’ Indians are against anything ‘Hindu’. They don’t realize the difference between western religions that have to be believed (or at least professed) blindly, and which discourage if not forbid their adherents to think on their own and the multi-layered Hindu Dharma which gives freedom and encourages using one’s intelligence.

Many of the educated class do not realize that on one hand, westerners, especially those who dream to impose their own religion on this vast country, will applaud them for denigrating Hindu Dharma, because this helps western universalism to spread in India. On the other hand, many westerners, including Church people, very well know the value and surreptitiously appropriate insights from the vast Indian knowledge system, drop the original source and present it either as their own or make it look as if these insights had been known in the west.

Rajiv Malhotra of Infinity Foundation has done painstaking research in this field and has documented many cases of “digestion” of Dharma civilization into western universalism. He chose the term digestion, as it implies that that which is being digested (a deer for example) is in the end no longer there, whereas the ‘digester’ (a tiger) becomes stronger. Similarly, Hindu civilization is gradually being depleted of its valuable, exclusive assets and what is left is called inferior.

If only missionaries denigrated Hindu Dharma, it would not be so bad, as they clearly have an agenda which discerning Indians would detect. But sadly, Indians with Hindu names assist them because they wrongly believe that Hinduism is inferior to western religions. They belittle everything Hindu instead of getting thorough knowledge. As a rule, they know little about their tradition except what the British told them, i.e. that the major features are caste system and idol worship. They don’t realize that India would gain, not lose, if it solidly backed its profound and all inclusive Hindu tradition. The Dalai Lama said some time ago that already as a youth in Lhasa, he had been deeply impressed by the richness of Indian thought. “India has great potential to help the world,” he added. When will the westernized Indian elite realize it?