Showing posts with label ANCIENT HISTORY OF INDIA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ANCIENT HISTORY OF INDIA. Show all posts

Friday, November 23, 2018

Indian victories not told by historians

Victories of Indian Warriors against Islamic Invaders that History Books Ignored
By 

Manoshi Sinha is a writer, poet, certified astrologer, avid traveler, and author of 7 books including 'The Eighth Avatar', and 'Blue Vanquisher' - Krishn Trilogy 1 and 2 that delve on Krishn beyond myth

Islamic invaders ruled only parts of India, not India as our history books tell us. Indian rulers did offer stiff resistance to invaders. They fought until their last breath. There are hundreds of valorous victories by our ancestors from the east to west, north to south from 8th century to 18th century – the period of Islamic invasion, plunder, and rule. But these glorious stories are kept hidden. Rather we are taught more about glories of invaders. Many regions could not be touched by Mughals or other Islamic plunderers given the military strength of the respective rulers.
Marcus Garvey, a Jamaican-born political leader and social activist, has rightly said, “A people without the knowledge of their past history, origin and culture is like a tree without roots.” In the true sense of the term, we are a tree without roots. Because we are denied knowledge of our true history. Robert Heinlein, an American author wrote, “A generation which ignores history has no past and no future.” We are a generation that have ignored history in the true sense.

The fighting spirit in Indian warriors started declining after the concept of non-violence gained momentum. Most Indian kings and their subjects lost interest in warfare. Generation after generation, the courage, fearlessness, and valor which otherwise were the key attributes of warriors and soldiers, started to decline. Few Indian rulers gave little importance in maintaining a robust army or upgradation of military infrastructure. Hence, they were taken unawares when Islamic invaders attacked their kingdoms. They could not offer any stiff resistance. Though Bharat was advanced in every field these rulers could not save their respective kingdoms from being looted and plundered by Islamic invaders. They couldn’t save their men from being butchered and women taken away as sex slaves. They couldn’t they save the hundreds and thousands of heritage temples, ancestral buildings and universities from being destroyed by the Islamic plunderers. The concept of non-violence weakened and destroyed the warrior spirit in many an Indian kingdom, which led to their destruction.

But not all kingdoms followed this concept of non-violence. Those rulers who kept a ready army and upgraded their military infrastructure survived the attacks. They offered a stiff resistance. But all of these sagas of valor and victory are not highlighted in our history books. Let us delve on few of our glories.

Lalitaditya Muktapida was the ruler of Kashmir when Junaid, the Arab governor of Sindh, attacked Kashmir following the orders of Caliph Hisham in the 8th century. The Kashmir king defeated Junaid and thus the Arab attempt of plundering Kashmir failed. Lalitaditya Muktapida also subjugated the Turks by attacking their territories. Raja Samgramaraja of Kashmir in the 11th century repulsed several attacks of Mahmud of Ghazni. Plunderer Mahmud could never defeat the Kashmiri king! Besides, Raja Samgramaraja also helped Trilochanpala, the Hindu Sahi ruler of Kabul, with an army against Mahmud of Ghazni. The combined army defeated Sultan Mahmud.

One of the biggest alliances of Indian rulers was witnessed when the Arabs attacked and ransacked cities up to Ujjain before the mid 8th century.  The battle was fought between the Arab forces led by Emir Junaid and and an alliance of Indian dynasties led by Gurjar Pratihar king Nagbhat I. The Indian alliance comprised of Gurjar Pratihars, Chalukyas, Rashtrakuta, Guhil, etc. A series of battles was fought between Arabs and Hindus. The final battle was fought in 738 AD in the borders of Rajasthan. The Arabs faced a crushing defeat. After this Muslim plunderers did not think of attacking India for several years, in fact, for more than a century!


Do you know Ghori first attacked the Gujarat region? Gujarat was then ruled by the Chalukya Solanki Rajputs. Naiki Devi was then the Queen Regent; the ruler Mularaja II was a minor. Ghori was badly defeated in the battle that took place in 1178. Firishta, a Persian historian from the 16th century mentions how the ruler of Gujarat defeated the Muslim army “with great slaughter”. Mohammad Ghori was so badly defeated in this expedition that he did not think about attacking India until 1191! Never again did he attack Gujarat in his life!

Assam king Prithu defeated Bakhtiyar Khilji (the plunderer who burnt Nalanda University) in 1206 AD. Prithu badly wounded Khilji and made him bedridden. Ahoms stationed a strong force to counter attacks. The Ahoms defeated the Islamic invaders several times. In 1527 A.D., Rukunuddin Rukun Khan, the general of Nasiruddin Nasrat Shah, the Sultan of Bengal invaded Kamrupa only to be defeated by the Ahoms. Viswa Singha was then the Ahom king of Kamrupa.  Hearing about the defeat of Rukun Khan, the Sultan dispatched his general Mit Manik with an army of one thousand horsemen and ten thousand foot soldiers. In this battle, the Ahoms won. Mit Manik was taken prisoner while Rukun Khan fled from the battlefield.  The Ahoms captured a large booty including some fire arms. And who isn’t familiar with Ahom general Lachit Borphukan who defeated the Mughals in the Battle of Saraighat in 1671!

Who doesn’t know about Taimur Lang, one of the most barbaric of Islamic invaders who massacred lakhs of Hindus, razed temples to the ground, and looted wealth of temples and civilians! All of this happened on his way from across the Indus River covering Attock towards Delhi. Do you know Taimur could not succeed in plundering India during his return expedition?  Around 80,000 men from different communities, ranging from Jats, Gurjars, Rajputs, Brahmins to Ahirs, Valmikis, and hill tribes were part of the troop that attacked Taimur and slaughtered a major portion of his army. Meerut, Haridwar and neighboring areas were saved from being looted and plundered by Taimur. It was Devpala, a Jat who held a Mahapanchayat and made this possible. Mahabali Jograj Singh Gurjar was the Supreme General while 20-year old Rampyari Gurjar was the General of 40,000 women warriors. Together, the men and women warriors wreaked havoc on Taimur in Meerut and Haridwar in 1398, forcing him to flee India.

Mughal army sent by Shah Jahan in 1640 to attack Garhwal failed in the expedition. Rani Karnavati badly defeated them. She also cut the noses of the surviving Mughal soldiers due to which she was called Naak Kati Rani. Her cruel and merciless stance frightened the Mughals and they could never win Garhwal.

Likewise, Rani Bhavashankari, Akbar’s contemporary, made it compulsory to recruit a soldier from every family. She was the ruler of Bhurishhrestha of Bengal. She stationed forces at the border and well maintained her army. She defeated the Pathan Sultan thrice. Even Akbar did not interfere in her sovereignty.

Narasimhadeva from Orissa built the Konark temple after his victory against Islamic rulers. He attacked the Bengal Sultanate’s territories before the Sultan could attack him. During battle, he played one tactic played by the Islamic invaders and he won. It was 1248 AD.

Kapaya Nayaka, a Musunri Nayaka, in the South drove the Tughlaqs out of the Warrangal (then Telangana) territory in 1336 and re-established Hindu supremacy. He could do this with the help of 75 subordinate Nayakas; another best example of unity against a common foreign enemy. He also helped other South Indian kingdoms regain back their kingdoms from the Islamic invaders.

Raja Ganesha, a direct descendant of the Deva dynasty of Bengal, recaptured the throne of Bengal from Islamic rulers in 1414. He establish his superiority and Hindu dominion in a region dominated by the Muslims for over 200 years. According to the book Riyaz-us-Salatin, a chronicle written in Persian language by Ghulam Husain Salim Zaidpuri on the complete history of the Muslim rule in Bengal, nobleman Ganesha killed Shihabuddin and seized the throne. In alliance with another Hindu king Sivasimha of Mithila, Ganesha defeated Ibrahim Shah, a neighboring Sultan.

Prataprao Gurjar, the Maratha Senapati and Morapant Pingle, the first Peshwa led the Maratha army of 20,000 soldiers against Mughals numbering 40,000 at Battle of Salher, Nashik 1672. Though the Marathas were less superior to the Mughals in terms of weaponry and war animals yet in this fierce battle, the Marathas emerged victorious! This battle saw the Mughals decimated for the first time in an open battle! But is there any mention of this victorious battle in our history books?

Tarabai Bhosale (daughter-in-law of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj), who ruled the Maratha Empire from 1700 until 1708, herself led her army into the battlefield and successfully fought against Mughal forces. According to Jadunath Sarkar, a prominent Bengali historian, it was because of the administrative genius and strength of Tarabai that the Maratha Empire survived the awful crisis from 1700 to 1707 – when Mughals tried their best to occupy Maratha territories, but in vain. She valorously defended her territories.

Baba Banda Singh Bahadur, General of Guru Gobind Singh’s Khalsa army at the age of 38, led five battles to victory against Mughal and other Islamic forces. This included three battles in 1709 in Sonepat, Samana, and Sadhaura and two battles in 1710 at Chappar Chiri and Rahon. Following victory in Chappar Chiri battle, Banda Singh established his rule in Punjab. By 1710 Banda Singh Bahadur captured almost entire Punjab in the east of Lahore and put an end to Islamic rule in this region.

Rani Chennamma of Keladi fought against Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb’s forces. The battle took place because Chennamma gave shelter to Rajaram Raje Bhonsle, younger son of Chhatrapati Shivaji and facilitated his escape to Jinji Fort. It was the enemy Mughal forces who withdrew in this battle, sensing defeat and begged for a treaty. It was for the first time that the Mughals proposed peace accord with an Indian ruler! She also defeated the Sultan of Bijapur.

Pazhassi Raja, who became the prince regent of the princely state of Kottayam of Malabar at a young age of 21 in 1774 bravely resisted Hyder Ali’s troops using guerrilla warfare techniques. He set up a number of guerrilla bases in the forested mountains of Puralimala and Wayanad, which he and his men were well familiar of. And they started attacking Hyder Ali’s troops in small groups at short intervals. This resulted in casualties in the Mysore army with every attack until Mysore troops reduced to a considerable extent. Hyder Ali entered into alliance with two neighboring chiefs to collectively crush Pazhassi Raja, but in vain. He could never defeat Pazhassi Raja. In later years, he also resisted Tipu Sultan’s troops.

There are countless more examples of victory by Indian warriors against Islamic invaders and rulers, but these are not shown in our history books. Islamic rulers ruled only a part of India not whole but we are made to read they ruled India.

Yes, Islamic invaders and plunderers could also loot and plunder few kingdoms because Bharatiya rulers strictly followed rules of Dharma in warfare. They avoided fighting with an opponent already engaged in a fight with another. They avoided stabbing from behind or hitting below the navel. They took care of the injured at the end of the day. They considered women, prisoners of war, and farmers as sacred. They never pillaged the land or destroyed standing structures in enemy lands. They were merciful if enemies asked for pardon. Battlefield exploits took place only during daytime. This was followed since time immemorial.

History is full of such examples of Dharma followed by Indian Hindu kings. Prithviraj Chauhan pardoned Mohammad Ghori when he asked for pardon though the latter attacked him several times. At one instance Prithviraj saw Ghori fleeing from the battlefield but he did not attack the running enemy. On the final (16th according to few sources) attack, Ghori defeated Prithviraj. Did Ghori pardon Prithviraj? No! He raped the king’s wife Sanyogita in front of him several times and took him prisoner to Ghor where he tortured him to death. Ghori plundered Delhi, slaughtered to death soldiers and civilians, took women as sex slaves, destroyed temples, and the list of atrocities is endless. Had Prithviraj killed Ghori, history would have been different. King Prithu of Assam badly defeated Bhaktiyar Khilji in 1206 AD, but he allowed the Muslim prisoners of war to settle in his kingdom when they sought pardon. That was how Muslim settlement in Assam started. Hindu kings never defied rules of Dharma.

But Islamic invaders and plunderers did the opposite of these very rules of Dharma followed by Hindu kings in warfare. They followed the tactics of treachery, deception and cruelty. They plundered kingdoms, pillaged land, killed the weak and innocent, raped women and took them as slaves, stabbed warriors from behind, destroyed standing structures and temples, and what not! Converting the defeated people to Islam was one of their key strategies. Akbar, deemed ‘the GREAT’ ordered the slaughter of around 40,000 unarmed old men, women and children of Chittorgarh after he captured it on 23 February 1568 as per accounts by Abul Fazl and Badauni, Muslim historians. Rajput women started committing Jauhar only to save themselves from disgrace at the hands of Muslim invaders.

In 1226, Raja Bir Singh of Birsinghpur in Bengal defeated the Turks led by Giasuddin Iwaz Khilji. Facing defeat, the Turks hatched a plan of treachery. To easily subjugate the Hindu army of Raja Bir Singh, Giasuddin Iwaz Khilji used cattle in the battlefield. Each horn of the cows was wrapped with a piece of cloth soaked in flamable liquid. The horns were lit up when the battle was about to begin. The Muslim army followed the cattle that ran berserk towards the Hindu army. As cows were sacred to the Hindus, the Hindu army did not give resistance. Giving a resistance would harm the cows. Using this trick of treachery, Khilji won the second battle.

Afzhal Khan, the ablest of commanders of the Adilshahi army of the Bijapur Sultanate deceived negotiators during meetings. In 1639, he treacherously murdered Kasturi Ranga, the king of Sera, a small South Indian kingdom, during a meeting. Shivaji went to meet Afzhal Khan after equipping himself with weapons hidden from view. Because he knew Afzhal Khan might secretly attack him. In the meeting, Afzhal Khan applied his treacherous tactics and secretly attacked Shivaji during an embrace. Shivaji immediately reciprocated, disemboweling him with the wagh nakh and stabbing him with the bichu. A combat followed. Sambhaji Kavji, Shivaji’s bodyguard killed the heavily injured Afzhal Khan.

A few months before Shivaji’s coronation in 1674, the Sultan of Bijapur Adil Shah sent his general Bahalol Khan with a huge army to attack Maratha territory.  The Marathas under Prataprao Gurjar defeated the Bijapuri forces and took Bahalol Khan captive and seized their war material. Shivaji had warned all of his Senapatis and the Sardars to never trust enemies and never let them go free. When Bahalol Khan repeatedly begged Prataprao for pardon and promised never to attack Maratha territory again, Prataprao Gurjar released Bahalol Khan, his troops including the seized war material. Did Bahalol Khan keep his promise? No! Prataprao Gurjar followed rules of Dharma but the Muslim army did not. Bahalol Khan marched towards Maratha territory with a fresh force of 15000 soldiers. As Khan camped unawares, Prataprao Gurjar could not arrange a big army. He had only 1200 soldiers. Ultimately he attained martyrdom at the hands of Bahalol Khan. Later the Marathas defeated Bahalol Khan in the following battle. These are only few examples of how Muslim rulers and generals deceived Hindu warriors.

Moreover, there were internal conflicts between rulers (lack of unity) and even internal conflicts within a kingdom for the throne. Then there were traitors who sided with the foreigners. All of these resulted in subjugation of many Indian kingdoms at the hands of the plunderers and looters, who were merciless and barbaric. And a similar situation still exists. And there is no dearth of traitors even today!

After Islamic invasion and rule, British, like termites damaged our cultural and educational heritage and infused the inferiority and mental slavery syndrome in Indian brains. They drained away our resources and turned India into a poor nation, economically, culturally, and socially. Lakhs of freedom fighters sacrificed their lives for the freedom we enjoy today yet this freedom is attributed to one namesake leader.

Our education syllabus, especially pertaining to History, has been designed in such a manner that we are bound to suffer from the inferiority complex syndrome. These questions will always arise in our minds – Were we always defeated? Why did our ancestors not offer any resistance? Why were we always so easily looted and plundered? These questions are bound to drift us from our rich cultural roots and ancestry, from our historicity and traditions, from our belongingness to the nation.

It is time we know our true historical roots. Jai Hind!

Featured image courtesy: Rohan Bendre and Quora.

Key Ref
Saffron Swords, Manoshi Sinha.

Saturday, October 31, 2015

Europeans crooked History of India


पश्चिम एसिया और भारत-भारतीय इतिहास में अंग्रेजों द्वारा इतनी भयानक जालसाजी हुयी है कि कोई भी वर्णन पश्चिम या मध्य एसिया के इतिहास से नहीं मिलता है और पूर्व भाग के बारे में बिलकुल ही भूल गये। राजतरंगिणी के अनुसार गोनन्द वंश का ६२वां राजा हिरण्यकुल था जिसने लौकिकाब्द २२५२-२३१२ अर्थात् ८२४-७६४ ई.पू. तक शासन किया। उसका पुत्र वसुकुल (७६४-७०४) तथा मिहिरकुल (७०४-६३४) ई.पू. था। उसके पूर्व इसी गोनन्द वंश का ५१वां शासक हुष्क था जिसके पुत्रों जुष्क और कनिष्क ने १२९४-१२३४ ई.पू. तक शासन किया। कनिष्क को उज्जैन के परमारवंशी राजा विक्रमादित्य (८२ ई.पू. -१९ ई) के पौत्र शालिवाहन (७८-१२८ ई.) के शक से जोड़ कर परमार वंश का नाम उड़ा दिया। यदि यह जालसाजी सही है तो सम्पूर्ण बाइबिल और इसाई इतिहास झूठा हो जायेगा। प्रायः ४ ई.पू. में विक्रमादित्य राज्य के मगध से २ ज्योतिषी गये थे जिन्होंने ईसा को महापुरुष बताया था। उस समय विक्रमादित्य और इजरायल के रोमन राज्य के बीच कोई अन्य राज्य नहीं था। शूली पर बेहोश हो कर उतरने के बाद ईसा मसीह कश्मीर आये जिनका निवास हजरत बल (बहाल = रहना) कहा जाता है। यह शालिवाहन राज्य में हुआ। इसाई मान्यता के अनुसार ईसा के शिष्य थोमस ८२ ई. में मद्रास (चेन्नई) आये थे (शालिवाहन शक के ४ वर्ष बाद)। अतः उस समय भारत आश्रय स्थल था, आक्रमण का शिकार नहीं था।
उससे पूर्व असीरिया का उदय नबोनासर काल में होने पर भारत पर पहला आक्रमण ८२४ ई.पू. में हुआ जिसका प्रतिरोध खारावेल की गज सेना ने मथुरा में किया (खारावेल प्रशस्ति, शासन के ४ वर्ष बाद नन्द शक १६३४ ई.पू. का ८०३ वर्ष, राज्य के ११ वर्ष पर मथुरा में शकों की पराजय)। यह विफल होने पर रानी सेमिरामी (ग्रीक नाम) ने सभी पड़्सी राज्यों की सहायता से ३५ लाख की सेना इकट्ठी की तथा ऊंटों को खोल पहना कर १०,००० नकली हाथी तैयार किये (होमर के ट्राय या भास के स्वप्नवासवदत्ता की तरह)। यह असुरों का सबसे बड़ा आक्रमण था जिसके प्रतिरोध के लिये विष्णु अवतार बुद्ध मगध में अजिन ब्राह्मण के पुत्र रूप में उत्पन्न हुये। सिद्धार्थ बुद्ध (१८८७-१८०७ ई.पू.) ने मगध राजाओं से दोस्ती कर केवल सारनाथ-गया के बीच के लोगों को मोहित किया था, असुरों को नहीं। उसके बाद गौतम बुद्ध (५वी सदी ई.पू.) ने वैदिक मार्ग नष्ट करने के लिये उत्तर प्रदेश में प्रयत्न किये। इन दोनों ने केवल वेद का विरोध किया असुरों का नहीं।
विष्णु बुद्ध ने ७५६ ई.पू. में आबू पर्वत पर ४ राजाओं का संघ राजा शूद्रक की अध्यक्षता में किया। इस समय शूद्रक शक आरम्भ हुआ (यल्ल का ज्योतिष दर्पण)। शूद्रक का नाम इन्द्राणीगुप्त (मृच्छकटिकम्) था, ब्राह्मण होने पर भी ४ राजाओं का प्रधान सेवक (जैसे आज प्रधान मन्त्री अपने को कहते हैं) होने के कारण उनको सम्मान के लिये शूद्र कहा गया। ४ जो भारत रक्षा में अग्रणी होने के कारण अग्निवंशी कहे गये-परमार प्रतिहार, चाहमान और शुक्ल (चालुक्य)। इन सबकी वंश परम्परा ७५६ ई.पू. से आरम्भ होती है पर कर्नल टाड ने उन सभी को हूण वंशी सिद्ध करने के लिये उनका काल ७३० ई.पू कर पुराना सभी अन्धकार युग कर दिया। इसके लिये उसको राणा कुम्भा का ताम्र-पट्ट तोड़ना पड़ा जिसमें उन्होंने अपने को ब्राह्मण बप्पा रावल का वंशज कहा था जो गोरखनाथ के आदेश से राजा बने थे। यही उनके द्वारा गीतगोविन्द व्याख्या की भूमिका में भी है। स्वयं गोरखनाथ को भी लुप्त कर यह शंकराचार्य का काल कर दिया जो अंग्रेजों के अनुसार मुस्लिम आक्रमण होने पर बौद्धों का विरोध कर रहे थे। सबसे बड़े असुर आक्रमण (७५६ ई.पू. सेमिरामी की ३५ लाख सेना + घुड़सवार+नकली हाथी प्रायः ४ लाख) को इसी संघ ने पराजित किया। सभी पाश्चात्य इतिहास इसका वर्णन करते हैं पर भारत में इसके २०० वष बाद से राज्य व्यवस्था कही जाती है। ६१२ ई.पू. में दिल्ली के चाहमान राजा ने असुर (असीरिया) राजधानी निनेवे को पूरी तरह ध्वस्त कर दिया जिसका बाइबिल में ५ स्थानों पर वर्णन है। इस समय चाहमान शक आरम्भ हुआ जिसका प्रयोग वराहमिहिर तथा ब्रह्मगुप्त (बृहत् संहित १३/३) ने किया है। इसके बाद ४५६ ई.पू. में शक आक्रमण हुये जिनका प्रतिरोध मालवा के राजा श्रीहर्ष ने कर मालव गण समाप्त कर दिया (राजतरंगिणी, कथा सरित् सागर, अलबिरुनि आदि)। श्रीहर्ष शासन समाप्त होने पर आन्ध्र वंशी राजाओं के सेनापति घटोत्कच (मेगास्थनीज आदि ग्रीक लेखकों द्वारा इसका अनुवाद नाई किया है) ने उसे समाप्त कर अपने पुत्र चन्द्रगुप्त-१ को राजा बनाया। इस समय सिकन्दर का आक्रमण हुआ था और उसके लेखकों ने आन्ध्र राजाओं की सेना का तथा चन्द्रगुप्त समुद्रगुप्त का वर्णन किया है। उसके बाद सेल्यूकस आक्रमण का समुद्रगुप्त के इलाहाबाद स्तम्भ लेख में वर्णन है। उसके पुत्र चन्द्रगुप्त-२ ने उसे पराजित कर उसकी पुत्री से विवाह किया जिसका विस्तृत वर्णन देवी-चन्द्रगुप्तम् नाटक तथा उसके आधार पर जयशंकर प्रसाद के ध्रुवस्वामिनी नाटक (१९३० ई.) में है। गुप्त काल समाप्त होने पर ८२ ई.पू. में उज्जैन के परमार राजा विक्रमादित्य का साम्राज्य बना जिस काल में ईसा मसीह का जन्म, सीजर की पराजय, बन्दी बनना और इस कारण ब्रूटस द्वारा उसकी हत्या तथा ४६ ई,पू. मे विक्रम वर्ष १० के पौष मास से मिलाने के लिये जूलियन वर्ष ७ दिन बाद आरम्भ हुआ। उनके पौत्र शालिवाहन काल में ईसा तथा उनके शिष्यों ने भारत में शरण लिया। गणना के लिये शालिवाहन शक तथा पर्व के लिये विक्रम सम्वत् आज भी चल रहे हैं। शक सम्वत्सर का अर्थ नहीं समझने वालों द्वारा बनाया गया राष्ट्रीय-शक-सम्वत् न तो राष्ट्रीय है, न शक है, न सम्वत् है। विक्रमादित्य राज्य के बाद कुछ समय विप्लव स्थिति थी जब (१९-३० ई.) में तातार, तुर्क, हूण और चीनी लोगों ने आक्रमण किये जिनका तिब्बत तथा चीन इतिहास में भी उल्लेख है। इस समय गुप्तवंश की एक शाखा ने गुजरात के वलभी में राज्य स्थापित किया, जिसके नष्ट होने पर ३१९ ई. में वलभी भङ्ग शक आरम्भ हुआ (अलबिरुनि)। प्रायः इसी समय अंग्रेजों ने मूल गुप्त राज्य का आरम्भ कर दिया है।
जिस समय हूण शकों का आक्रमण कहा जाता है उस समय उत्तर भारत में हर्षवर्धन तथा अग्निवंशी राजाओं का शासन था। हुएनसांग या फाहियान ने इस काल में किसी शक आक्रमण का नाम नही सुना था जो मध्य एसिया रास्ते से ही आये थे।

Monday, March 9, 2015

QUEEN RUDRAMMA DEVI-SYMBOL OF WOMEN POWER IN ANCIENT INDIA

'Rani Rudramma Devi -- A Great Warrior-Ruler of the Kakatiyas 

Rani Rudhramadevi  was one of the most prominent rulers of the Kakatiya dynasty in the Deccan Plateau, being one of the few ruling queens in Indian history. Queen Rudramma Devi remains as one of India's most important woman and very few female rulers in south India for all time. Rani Rudramma Devi ruled from 1261 or 1262 until 1295 or 1296. 

Ganapathi Deva Maharaju (1199-1261 AD), one of the most key Kakatiya rulers, gave a masculine name to his daughter Rudramma Devi, calling her "Rudra Deva", owing to her impeccable administrative abilities in performing royal duty. She was a revolutionary ruler. She encourgaed foreign visitors and messengers to visit the kingdom. She was a brilliant administrator, noble ruler, and warrior Queen. After her victory over the Yadavas, she took the title Rajagaja kesari (which had also been held by her illustrious father). Visitors such as Marco Polo spoke of her enlightened rule, happy subjects, and palace’s splendor. Though being groomed for military exploits and statecraft, Rudramba is not remembered as a patron of the arts, the unique Kakatiya style of sculpture is nevertheless traced to her reign. 

Ganapatideva had two daughters Rudramadevi and Genapamadevi. Rudramadevi or Rudramba was given in marriage to a prince of the Eastern Chalukyan lineage (of Nidadavolu) called Virabhadra. The second daughter was given in marriage to Beta of the Kota family. 

Succession: On the advice of Sivadevayya (prime minister), Ganapati Deva nominated Rudrama Devi as his successor. When she was only 14 years old, Rani Rudrama Devi succeeded her father. In the first two or three years of her conjoint rule with her father, the kingdom was thrown into confusion and disorder due to Jatavarma Sundara Pandya-I's invasion and the disastrous defeat of the Kakatiyas along with their allies at the battle of Muttukur. Though Ganapati Deva turned the tide of the invasion, he lost his territory and his hold over his feudatories.  He retired from active politics and complete power was vested with Rudrama Devi. Various inscriptions suggested that her independent rule started from 1261 AD. Rudramma Devi ruled till 1289.

Reign: Her ascendancy was resented by some nobles and her cousins only because she was a woman. They later raised a banner of revolt. Rudrama Devi wore a male attire and sat on the throne and with an iron hand ruled the kingdom keeping the enemies at bay. Pandyas and Cholas from the south Indian peninsula were a great threat and she kept them at bay with great vigour. After her accession she had to fight Harihara Deva and Murari Deva, who revolted against her. She had some efficient nobles like Jaganni Deva and Gona Ganna Reddy who helped her in suppressing revolts.

The Kalinga King Narasimha-I, who suffered a defeat previously at the hands of Ganapati Deva, took advantage of the distracted condition in the Kakatiya dominions and marched with his forces into the Godavari delta to recover his lost possessions. In the later part of the reign of Rudrama Devi, the above provinces came back under her control. Her commanders Poti Nayaka and Proli Nayaka fought against Kalinga Vira Bhanudeva-I, son and successor of Narasimha-I, and his accomplices Arjuna Deva, the Matsya chief of Oddadi and others and inflicted a crushing defeat on them. The Kakatiya power was thus re-established in coastal Andhra.

 But the biggest threat came from the West in the form of Seuna Yadavas of Devagiri. Rudrama Devi defeated Mahadeva Raja, the Seuna Yadava ruler of Devagiri (Daulatabad in Aurangabad District at present in Maharashtra) who invaded Warangal (earlier known as Orugallu or Ekasilanagaramu) Fort, the capital of the Kakatiya empire, and chased him away. She crossed Godavari chasing the Yadava ruler right into his territories and forced him to make peace. The Devagiri king had to pay ransom to the queen and made peace. Although such treasures gained after victory belonged to the royal house, she distributed the wealth among her troops.

In the south, the Nellore Kingdom came under the power of the Pandyas and was placed under their vassals. The Kayastha chief Janniga Deva re-occupied the territories of the Nelluru kingdom and freed them thus from the Pandyan sway. He and his brother Tripurari Deva I (1270-72 A.D.) continued to rule the Nelluru kingdom as the vassals of Rudrama Devi. However, with the succession of their younger brother Amba Deva to the throne in 1272 AD, the situation underwent a change.

 Rudramma Devi could not tolerate disloyal Amba Deva. By that time Prataprudra, her grandson, became old enough to share the responsibilities of the administration. He was an extraordinary war planner. He planned a three-prong attack on Amba Deva. The intention was to weaken all his support systems so that he would not have had enough strength. Of the three, the first was led by the Queen Rudramma Devi and her general Mallikarjuna. However, as the recently discovered Chandupatla (Nalgonda district) inscription dated 1283 AD indicated, Amba Deva seemed to have killed Rudramma along with Mallikarjuna Nayaka in a battle that year. However, the army of Rudramma Devi was victorious. Later, Prataparudra II, successor of Rudramma, succeeded in completely suppressing the Kayastha revolt. 

Her rule and patronage: Among Rani Rudramma Devi's accomplishments during her reign was the completion of Warangal Fort, begun by her father, in the Kakatiya capital of Warangal (one stone hill). Parts of the fort are still standing, including examples of distinctive Kakatiya sculpture. She worshipped Goddesses Bhadrakali, Ekaveera and Padmakshi. She captured important forts like Mulikinadu, Renadu, Eruva, Mutthapi Nadu and Satti.

Legacy: Rudrama Devi was one of the most outstanding queens in Indian history from the Kakatiya dynasty and people still cherish her memories. Her gender did not come on her way in discharging the duties of her exalted office. She took an active part in governing the country and strove hard to promote the best interests of the state. In spite of the wars which frequently disturbed the country, her people remained contented and happy under her rule.

Marco Polo, the Venetian traveller who paid a visit to the kingdom probably a little later, spoke highly of her administrative qualities, benign rule and greatness.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The historians, writers and people of Chandupatla village, where an inscription that confirmed the exact death date of great Kakatiya ruler Rani Rudrama Devi was found few years ago, have appealed to the Telangana government to organise the 725th death anniversary of Rani Rudrama Devi on November 27 at this village. Until the inscription was found in 1994 at Chandupatla that confirmed the death date of Rudrama Devi as 1289 AD, November 27, there was no proof available on the death of the first Hindu woman emperor of India. According to historians, only Razia Sultana ruled parts of India from Delhi before Rudrama Devi.

Historian D. Suraya Kumar said that Rudrama Devi had initiated several welfare programmes like digging tanks for bringing many acres under cultivation, which was an inspiration for the Telangana government in restoring all the minor irrigation tanks. Besides an inscription, there are historical statues of Lord Ganesha and a warrior riding on the back of a horse in the village. 

The village tank, Rasamudram, built during the Kakatiya Samudram, also finds a mention in the inscription because the inscription was installed very close to the village tank by a soldier of Rudrama Devi’s army Puvvula Mummadi, who is believed to be a native of Chandupatla.

The inscription also says the Chief of Army of Rudrama Devi, Mallikarjuna Nayakudu, was killed on the same day, but there was no mention of the reason and the place of her death. 

=====================================================
Notes and Sources:
Rao, P. Ragunadha. History and Culture of Andhra Pradesh: From the Earliest Times to 1991. New Delhi: Sterling Publishers, 2012.
http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/telangana/govt-urged-to-observe-death-anniversary-of-rani-rudrama-devi/article6618762.ece
http://www.thehansindia.com/posts/index/2014-02-25/Rudrama-Devi-the-first-woman-ruler-of-Andhra--87355'Rani Rudramma Devi -- A Great Warrior-Ruler of the Kakatiyas
Rani Rudhramadevi was one of the most prominent rulers of the Kakatiya dynasty in the Deccan Plateau, being one of the few ruling queens in Indian history. Queen Rudramma Devi remains as one of India's most important woman and very few female rulers in south India for all time. Rani Rudramma Devi ruled from 1261 or 1262 until 1295 or 1296.
Ganapathi Deva Maharaju (1199-1261 AD), one of the most key Kakatiya rulers, gave a masculine name to his daughter Rudramma Devi, calling her "Rudra Deva", owing to her impeccable administrative abilities in performing royal duty. She was a revolutionary ruler. She encourgaed foreign visitors and messengers to visit the kingdom. She was a brilliant administrator, noble ruler, and warrior Queen. After her victory over the Yadavas, she took the title Rajagaja kesari (which had also been held by her illustrious father). Visitors such as Marco Polo spoke of her enlightened rule, happy subjects, and palace’s splendor. Though being groomed for military exploits and statecraft, Rudramba is not remembered as a patron of the arts, the unique Kakatiya style of sculpture is nevertheless traced to her reign.

Ganapatideva had two daughters Rudramadevi and Genapamadevi. Rudramadevi or Rudramba was given in marriage to a prince of the Eastern Chalukyan lineage (of Nidadavolu) called Virabhadra. The second daughter was given in marriage to Beta of the Kota family.
Succession: On the advice of Sivadevayya (prime minister), Ganapati Deva nominated Rudrama Devi as his successor. When she was only 14 years old, Rani Rudrama Devi succeeded her father. In the first two or three years of her conjoint rule with her father, the kingdom was thrown into confusion and disorder due to Jatavarma Sundara Pandya-I's invasion and the disastrous defeat of the Kakatiyas along with their allies at the battle of Muttukur. Though Ganapati Deva turned the tide of the invasion, he lost his territory and his hold over his feudatories. He retired from active politics and complete power was vested with Rudrama Devi. Various inscriptions suggested that her independent rule started from 1261 AD. Rudramma Devi ruled till 1289.
Reign: Her ascendancy was resented by some nobles and her cousins only because she was a woman. They later raised a banner of revolt. Rudrama Devi wore a male attire and sat on the throne and with an iron hand ruled the kingdom keeping the enemies at bay. Pandyas and Cholas from the south Indian peninsula were a great threat and she kept them at bay with great vigour. After her accession she had to fight Harihara Deva and Murari Deva, who revolted against her. She had some efficient nobles like Jaganni Deva and Gona Ganna Reddy who helped her in suppressing revolts.
The Kalinga King Narasimha-I, who suffered a defeat previously at the hands of Ganapati Deva, took advantage of the distracted condition in the Kakatiya dominions and marched with his forces into the Godavari delta to recover his lost possessions. In the later part of the reign of Rudrama Devi, the above provinces came back under her control. Her commanders Poti Nayaka and Proli Nayaka fought against Kalinga Vira Bhanudeva-I, son and successor of Narasimha-I, and his accomplices Arjuna Deva, the Matsya chief of Oddadi and others and inflicted a crushing defeat on them. The Kakatiya power was thus re-established in coastal Andhra.
But the biggest threat came from the West in the form of Seuna Yadavas of Devagiri. Rudrama Devi defeated Mahadeva Raja, the Seuna Yadava ruler of Devagiri (Daulatabad in Aurangabad District at present in Maharashtra) who invaded Warangal (earlier known as Orugallu or Ekasilanagaramu) Fort, the capital of the Kakatiya empire, and chased him away. She crossed Godavari chasing the Yadava ruler right into his territories and forced him to make peace. The Devagiri king had to pay ransom to the queen and made peace. Although such treasures gained after victory belonged to the royal house, she distributed the wealth among her troops.
In the south, the Nellore Kingdom came under the power of the Pandyas and was placed under their vassals. The Kayastha chief Janniga Deva re-occupied the territories of the Nelluru kingdom and freed them thus from the Pandyan sway. He and his brother Tripurari Deva I (1270-72 A.D.) continued to rule the Nelluru kingdom as the vassals of Rudrama Devi. However, with the succession of their younger brother Amba Deva to the throne in 1272 AD, the situation underwent a change.
Rudramma Devi could not tolerate disloyal Amba Deva. By that time Prataprudra, her grandson, became old enough to share the responsibilities of the administration. He was an extraordinary war planner. He planned a three-prong attack on Amba Deva. The intention was to weaken all his support systems so that he would not have had enough strength. Of the three, the first was led by the Queen Rudramma Devi and her general Mallikarjuna. However, as the recently discovered Chandupatla (Nalgonda district) inscription dated 1283 AD indicated, Amba Deva seemed to have killed Rudramma along with Mallikarjuna Nayaka in a battle that year. However, the army of Rudramma Devi was victorious. Later, Prataparudra II, successor of Rudramma, succeeded in completely suppressing the Kayastha revolt.
Her rule and patronage: Among Rani Rudramma Devi's accomplishments during her reign was the completion of Warangal Fort, begun by her father, in the Kakatiya capital of Warangal (one stone hill). Parts of the fort are still standing, including examples of distinctive Kakatiya sculpture. She worshipped Goddesses Bhadrakali, Ekaveera and Padmakshi. She captured important forts like Mulikinadu, Renadu, Eruva, Mutthapi Nadu and Satti.
Legacy: Rudrama Devi was one of the most outstanding queens in Indian history from the Kakatiya dynasty and people still cherish her memories. Her gender did not come on her way in discharging the duties of her exalted office. She took an active part in governing the country and strove hard to promote the best interests of the state. In spite of the wars which frequently disturbed the country, her people remained contented and happy under her rule.
Marco Polo, the Venetian traveller who paid a visit to the kingdom probably a little later, spoke highly of her administrative qualities, benign rule and greatness.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The historians, writers and people of Chandupatla village, where an inscription that confirmed the exact death date of great Kakatiya ruler Rani Rudrama Devi was found few years ago, have appealed to the Telangana government to organise the 725th death anniversary of Rani Rudrama Devi on November 27 at this village. Until the inscription was found in 1994 at Chandupatla that confirmed the death date of Rudrama Devi as 1289 AD, November 27, there was no proof available on the death of the first Hindu woman emperor of India. According to historians, only Razia Sultana ruled parts of India from Delhi before Rudrama Devi.
Historian D. Suraya Kumar said that Rudrama Devi had initiated several welfare programmes like digging tanks for bringing many acres under cultivation, which was an inspiration for the Telangana government in restoring all the minor irrigation tanks. Besides an inscription, there are historical statues of Lord Ganesha and a warrior riding on the back of a horse in the village.
The village tank, Rasamudram, built during the Kakatiya Samudram, also finds a mention in the inscription because the inscription was installed very close to the village tank by a soldier of Rudrama Devi’s army Puvvula Mummadi, who is believed to be a native of Chandupatla.
The inscription also says the Chief of Army of Rudrama Devi, Mallikarjuna Nayakudu, was killed on the same day, but there was no mention of the reason and the place of her death.
=====================================================
Notes and Sources:
Rao, P. Ragunadha. History and Culture of Andhra Pradesh: From the Earliest Times to 1991. New Delhi: Sterling Publishers, 2012.
http://www.thehindu.com/…/govt-urged-to-…/article6618762.ece
http://www.thehansindia.com/posts/index/2014-02-25/Rudrama-Devi-the-first-woman-ruler-of-Andhra--87355

Monday, March 2, 2015

ANCIENT INDIAN NAVAL POWER DESTROYED BY BRITISH

The old notion that the Hindus were essentially a landlocked people, lacking in a spirit of adventure and the heart to brave the seas, is now dispelled. The researches of a generation of scholars have proved that from very early times the people of India were distinguished by nautical skill and enterprise, that they went on trading voyages to distant shores across the seas, and even established settlements and colonies in numerous lands and islands.

In ancient India, owing to the geographical influence, nautical shill and enterprise seems to have been best developed in three widely separated region of the country. These were Bengal, the valley and delta of the Indus, and the extreme south of the Deccan peninsula, called Tamilagam.

Boat-making and ship-building industries were found in India since ancient times. In the Vedic period, sea was frequently used for trade purposes. The Rig Veda mentions "merchants who crowd the great waters with ships". The Ramayana speaks of merchants who crossed the sea and bought gifts for the king of Ayodhya. Manu legislates for safe carriage and freights by river and sea. In some of the earliest Buddhist literature we read of voyages ‘out of sight’ of land, some lasting six months or so.

In Kautalya Arthasastra the admiralty figures as a separate department of the War Office; and this is a striking testimony to the importance attached to it from very early times. In the Rg Veda Samhita boats and ships are frequently mentioned. The classical example often quoted by every writer on the subject is the naval expedition of Bhujya who was sent by his father with the ship which had a hundred oars (aritra). Being ship-wrecked he was rescued by the twin Asvins in their boat.

"There was also extensive intercourse of India with foreign countries, including the Mediterranean lands and the African continent, naturally led to piracy on the waters. There then arose the need for the protection of sea-borne trade, and we are told that “at the outset the merchant vessels of India carried a small body of trained archers armed with bows and arrows to repulse the attacks of the pirates, but later they employed guns, cannon and other more deadly weapons of warfare with a few wonderful and delusive contrivances.”
(source: The Commerce and Navigation of the Ancients In the Indian Ocean - William Vincent pp. 457). These are probably the beginnings of the ancient Indian navy.

In the Shanti Parvan (59, 41) of the Mahabharata it is said that the navy is one of the angas (part) of the complete army. Examples of ships being used for military purposes are not lacking. When Vidura scented danger to Kunti’s five sons, he made them escape to the forest with their mother, crossing the Ganges in a boat equipped with weapons having the power of withstanding wind and wave.


In the Dig Vijaya portion of the Sabha parva, it is said that Sahadeva crossed the sea and brought many islands under his sway after defeating the Mlecchas and other mixed tribes inhabiting them. If this be an historical fact the inference is irresistible that he could not have effected his conquest without the use of boats and vessels. We read in the Ramayana that Durmukha, a Raksasa, who had been fired by the impulse of anger at the deeds of Hanuman, offered his services to Ravana even to fight on the sea.
INDIA WAS EXPORTER OF COMMODITY and also SHIPS OF HUGE SIZES and BRITISH destroyed the industry to dominate!!
INDIAN ECONOMY WAS WORLD LARGEST AND MOST PROSPEROUS NATION AND INDIAN SHIPPING INDUSTRY WAS DESTROYED BY BRITISHERS FOR TRADE DOMINANCE !!!
Nicolo Conti who visited India in 15th century was impressed by the quality Indians had achieved in ship building. He observes:
"The nations of India build some ships larger than ours, capable of containing 2,000 butts, and with five sails and as many masts. The lower part is constructed with triple planks, in order to withstand the force of the tempests to which they are much exposed. But some ships are so built in compartments that should one part be shattered, the other portion remaining entire may accomplish the voyage."
J. Ovington, Chaplain to the British King, the seventeenth-century English traveler, who visited Surat, wrote a book A Voyage to Surat in the Year 1689. He was impressed by the skill of the Indians in ship-building and found that they even outshone Europeans. The timber used by the Indians was so strong that it would not ‘crack’ even by the force of a bullet so he urged the English to use that timber ‘to help them in war’. Indian Teak stood firmer than the English Oak, remarked Ovington.

Sunday, December 28, 2014

ANCIENT HISTORY OF INDIA

Sādhya yuga –prior to 31000 BC. Devas were called Yāma. 4 main classes-Sādhya, Mahārājika, Ābhāsvara, Tuṣita, like Brāhmaṇa, Kṣatriya, Vaiśya, Śūdra. After glacial floods of 31000 BC, Svāyambhuva Manu, called human Brahmā re-started civilization with Vedic culture in 29102 BC. He is called Adam in Bible and was 26000 years before Kali yuga starting after Mahābhārata war as per Brahmāṇḍa purāṇa.
After a long gap, Kaśyapa (second Brahmā) re-started Vedic era. Asuras were supreme for 10 yugas = 3600 years. 
King Pṛthu was supreme in about 17000 BC who re-organized cultivation and large scale mining. To share, mining & other products, there were 12 major wars between Deva & Asuras. To stop that, Kūrma incarnation of Viṣṇu suggested joint mining called Samudra-manthana. Still, wars continued. Varāha killed Hiraṇyākṣa of south America (Puṣkara dvīpa) in about 16500 BC. Narasimha killed Hiraṇyakaśipu of Lybya-Ezypt of same group called younger brother. His great grandson Bali returned 3 lokas-Russia, China, India-to Indra. Rāhu was not satisfied with this treaty & wars continued.
Kārttikeya in 15800 BC (north pole moved away from Abhijit, Mahābhārata, Vana parva 230/8-10) started Deva supremacy by capturing Krauncha Dvīpa (north America, land & main mountain range both are in shape of flying bird). This is indicated by Greek authors like Arian, Megasthenes that India was self sufficient in everything, so it never attacked any other country since last 15000 years (before Alexander attack in 326 BC).
Vaiavsvata Manu in 13902 BC started present Yuga system. Earlier system of Veda was Brahma sampradāya. His system was called Āditya sampradāya, later on revived by Yājñavalkya in about 4000 BC. During period of Yama Vaivasvata (of same tradition as Vaivasvata Manu, called younger brother), glacial floods started in 10000 BC.
After this second glacial flood, Ṛṣabha Deva started civilization in about 9500 BC, so he is called descendant of Svāyambhuva Manu who had done this after 31000 BC. Maya Asura revised Sūrya-siddhānta in 9233 BC. Ikṣvāku re-established empire of Vaivasvata Manu on 1-11-8576 BC, so he is called son of Manu, though there was gap of about 5350 years. His son Vikukṣi has been called Ukusi in Iraq whose Kish chronicles have been found there dated about 8500 BC.
Father Baccus, called Dionysus attacked India and killed king Bahu in 6777 BC. According to Megasthenese, 153 generations of Indian kings ruled from that time for 6451 years 3 months as per Indian count till Chandragupta-1 of Gupta period in 327 BC when Alexander had attacked in 326 BC. 15 years after Baccus attack, king Sagara chased Yavanas of Arab to Greece after which it was named Ionia (Yunan) as per Herodotus. Some went to Yunnan of China also. Some attackers were forced to keep goat like beard as punishment, which later became respectable in Islam.
Paraśurāma destroyed Haihaya & Talajangha who had supported Baccus attack. Haihaya king Sahasrārjuna was killed by his alliance of 14 tribes from Khas in Asam, Kalinga of Orissa & Kurd of Iraq. His era has been called 120 years of democracy by Megasthenes (21 republics called 21 times wiping out of Kṣatriyas). On his death in 6177 BC, Kalamba era started called Kollam in Kerala. Ruins of his undersea town Sopara (Śūrpāraka-in shape of Chute) are found 30 kms long off coast of Mangalore estimated about 8000 years old.
Rama was born on 11-2-4433 BC on Sunday in 24th Tretā and ruled for 31 years after exile for 14 years from age of 25. His 35th descendant Bṛhadbala was killed in Mahābhārata in 3139 BC. Yudhiṣṭhira was coronated on 17-12-3139 BC (Yudhiṣṭhira śaka). Bhīṣma died after 5 days when nort motion of sun started after 58 days on bed of arrows. After rule of 36 years 3 months, Kaliyuga started on 17-2-3102 BC. After 6 months 11 days, Jaya samvatsara started on 25-8-3102 BC when Yudhiṣṭhira went for Abhyudaya, so it is called Jayābhyudaya śaka. In Kali year 25, Yudhiṣṭhira died in Kashmir where Laukika era started in 3076 BC. After 60 years rule, Parīkṣita was killed in 3042 BC by Takṣaka Nāga. His son Janamejaya retaliated after 27 years and turned 2 towns into mass graves called Moin-jo-daro (place of dead) and Harappa (heap of bones). On repentance of mass deaths, he made 5 land grants on 27-11-3014 BC on occasion of solar eclipse at Puri.
After 7 generations, in time of Nicakṣu, Sarasvatī dried and his capital Hastinapur wiped out by Ganga. King of Kashi took Sanyāsa as 23rd Tīrthankara Pārśvanātha, when Jaina- Yudhiṣṭhira śaka started in 2634 BC.
Śiśunāga śaka (called Kauzad = snake in Burma) started after his death in 1954 BC. Nanda śaka (his coronation) was in 1634 BC. Naobonassir (Lavaṇāsura) attack from Assyria was defeated by Kharavel in 824 BC at Mathura-11 years of his rule. Semirami attack with 35 lakh army was repulsed by Mālava Gaṇa formed under Śūdraka (his śaka in 756 BC) with 4 Agnivamśī kings-Paramar, Pratihar, Chahman, Chalukya. Chahman king of Delhi wiped out Assyrian capital Nineve in 612 BC when the śaka used by Varahamihira, Brahmagupta started. Mālava Gaṇa lasted for 300 years as per Megasthenes till Śrīharṣa śaka of 456 BC. 
Paramar king Vikramaditya of Ujjain started Vikrama samvat in 57 BC. His grandson started Śālivāhana śaka in 78 AD after repulsing attack by Turk, Parasi, Tatar & Chinese. Chedi śaka started in 248 AD. After end of later Guptas at Valabhi in Gujrat, Valabhi bhanga śaka started in 319 AD.
BY ARUN UPADHYAY.